,,,,,,once apon a time i was offended to see the youngsters,and their hats wouldn't fit right and their pants would not stay up. then i was getting dressed one day and looked at me in the mirror and "it hit me,hey their all trying to dress like me!",,,,,i am fumble fingered,i am sorry,,,look for the book of barnabas go to chapter 9,,,,"i combined what he said and i sad together",,,,,i am too old to play on the computer,spank me if you will,i cannot spank any more if i pull off my belt my pants will fall to the ground and i will trip and fall,,,,in the old days i was cool,,and now i am 78 my pants sag down and i have trouble keeping people from seeing my underwear,,,,"so twice in the same lifetime,im cool,,,,im sagging",,,,,and so ill try to figure out how to separate the text im quoting from the things im saying,,,,"good luck,iamsoandso",,,,
ken,i did not want them to see what i told you.
"adding to it",,,,,thats it,,,,i was in fear they might read the "thread",,,and it would lead them to the wrong conclusion,,,me and you understand what we discussed for the last few weeks,,,,they do not if i show "I,E,T,,,",,,,in the scripture they(the others on cc),,may read it and be compelled to believe it so to believe "616",,,but we know different,,,,we know that 616 is an commentary,,,and that they took it from actual scriptures(misunderstanding them),,,,the Barnabas says exactly what they did,,,but did not change I,E,,,they the gnostics,thought they new. their mistake was to add to or take away...if we say it here,they(c.c.) must read the former pages to understand. if they do they will not be led astray. but if you consider if they only read a few of our post,,they may be compelled to believe 616,,,if they match it to Barnabas ch. 9,,,,so i must warn them that we are speaking of "heretics",quoting scriptures from "apostles",,,see it from the point of a simple mind,you are brilliant at interpreting the fragment we are working on,,,,but,do they believe you are disproving it or proving it?,,,,we can email each other,,this is a permanent record "the www",,,a year from now a brother may read the thing we speak of,,,and they will think 616,,is the mark,or 666. they need to know what me and you found. the scripture i sent you could lead them astray "right here" if they dont understand it they will reason the wrong path,,,do you agree they may draw the wrong conclusion if they see the scripture i showed you?,,,at times i say things to you and you say "i knew that",,i was afraid that if did not say things i knew you knew,,they would misunderstand it.i knew you understood it when we spoke of pardis and gan.,,,,we find nothing different here. the same,noah was 600 years old when he entered the ark.60 cubits by 6 was the man that was not made of the soil. 6000 years.we should add up the days of Noah. Abraham was 58 when Noah died."as in the days of noe",,,,gen. chapter 1 is a prophecy 6 sets of 1000 and then the mill. then the first day of creation.I haven't looked at the Epistle of Barnabas in 30 years. But, you're right, that seems to do it. It is clearly in the same tradition. It would seem important to Greeks because the dodecahedron has 12 sides and 30 edges. Philo found a lot of those kind of things, and they would have thought this was adding to him.
it is translated in the latin jesus,,,instead of greek ihsous....Where did Latin get into this? Aren't we thinking in Greek numbers here?
"70'th week",,,,,,,,6 days the lord created the earth and the heavens,,,and on the 7th day he gave the mill. kingdom,,,,,,,,,the missing week,the beggining to the end."adding to it",,,,,thats it,,,,i was in fear they might read the "thread",,,and it would lead them to the wrong conclusion,,,me and you understand what we discussed for the last few weeks,,,,they do not if i show "I,E,T,,,",,,,in the scripture they(the others on cc),,may read it and be compelled to believe it so to believe "616",,,but we know different,,,,we know that 616 is an commentary,,,and that they took it from actual scriptures(misunderstanding them),,,,the Barnabas says exactly what they did,,,but did not change I,E,,,they the gnostics,thought they new. their mistake was to add to or take away...if we say it here,they(c.c.) must read the former pages to understand. if they do they will not be led astray. but if you consider if they only read a few of our post,,they may be compelled to believe 616,,,if they match it to Barnabas ch. 9,,,,so i must warn them that we are speaking of "heretics",quoting scriptures from "apostles",,,see it from the point of a simple mind,you are brilliant at interpreting the fragment we are working on,,,,but,do they believe you are disproving it or proving it?,,,,we can email each other,,this is a permanent record "the www",,,a year from now a brother may read the thing we speak of,,,and they will think 616,,is the mark,or 666. they need to know what me and you found. the scripture i sent you could lead them astray "right here" if they dont understand it they will reason the wrong path,,,do you agree they may draw the wrong conclusion if they see the scripture i showed you?,,,at times i say things to you and you say "i knew that",,i was afraid that if did not say things i knew you knew,,they would misunderstand it.i knew you understood it when we spoke of pardis and gan.,,,,we find nothing different here. the same,noah was 600 years old when he entered the ark.60 cubits by 6 was the man that was not made of the soil. 6000 years.we should add up the days of Noah. Abraham was 58 when Noah died."as in the days of noe",,,,gen. chapter 1 is a prophecy 6 sets of 1000 and then the mill. then the first day of creation.
"you have the initials of the name of jesus",,,latin? why latin?(its interpreted form greek to latin),,,,its the first two letters of his name in greek.....these then also within the bond of His covenant? Yea, the Egyptians also practise circumcision. Learn then, my children, concerning all things richly, that Abraham, the first who enjoined circumcision, looking forward in spirit to Jesus, practised that rite, having received the mysteries of the three letters. For [the Scripture] says, And Abraham circumcised ten, and eight, and three hundred men of his household. What, then, was the knowledge given to him in this? Learn the eighteen first, and then the three hundred. The ten and the eight are thus denoted— Ten by Ι, and Eight by Η . You have [the initials of the, name of] Jesus. And because the cross was to express the grace [of our redemption] by the letter Τ, he says also, Three Hundred. He signifies, therefore, Jesus by two letters, and the cross by one. He knows this, who has put within us the engrafted gift of His doctrine. No one has been admitted by me to a more excellent piece of knowledge than this, but I know that you are worthy. the extra 18 aeons,,,,,and why
"adding to it",,,,,thats it,,,,i was in fear they might read the "thread",,,and it would lead them to the wrong conclusion,,,me and you understand what we discussed for the last few weeks,,,,they do not if i show "I,E,T,,,",,,,in the scripture they(the others on cc),,may read it and be compelled to believe it so to believe "616",,,but we know different,,,,we know that 616 is an commentary,,,and that they took it from actual scriptures(misunderstanding them),,,,the Barnabas says exactly what they did,,,but did not change I,E,,,they the gnostics,thought they new. their mistake was to add to or take away...if we say it here,they(c.c.) must read the former pages to understand. if they do they will not be led astray. but if you consider if they only read a few of our post,,they may be compelled to believe 616,,,if they match it to Barnabas ch. 9,,,,so i must warn them that we are speaking of "heretics",quoting scriptures from "apostles",,,see it from the point of a simple mind,you are brilliant at interpreting the fragment we are working on,,,,but,do they believe you are disproving it or proving it?,,,,we can email each other,,this is a permanent record "the www",,,a year from now a brother may read the thing we speak of,,,and they will think 616,,is the mark,or 666. they need to know what me and you found. the scripture i sent you could lead them astray "right here" if they dont understand it they will reason the wrong path,,,do you agree they may draw the wrong conclusion if they see the scripture i showed you?,,,at times i say things to you and you say "i knew that",,i was afraid that if did not say things i knew you knew,,they would misunderstand it.i knew you understood it when we spoke of pardis and gan.,,,,we find nothing different here. the same,noah was 600 years old when he entered the ark.60 cubits by 6 was the man that was not made of the soil. 6000 years.we should add up the days of Noah. Abraham was 58 when Noah died."as in the days of noe",,,,gen. chapter 1 is a prophecy 6 sets of 1000 and then the mill. then the first day of creation.
"70'th week",,,,,,,,6 days the lord created the earth and the heavens,,,and on the 7th day he gave the mill. kingdom,,,,,,,,,the missing week,the beggining to the end.