I sent this question out to all the churches in a particular which had a website online.
Here a reply which is very typical of the answers I received back.
The above is pretty much the general consensus view held by the vast majority of pastors in the church system. It does not matter which denomination these answers come from, they all pretty much answer in the same way.
They will say that mercy and forgiveness is not contingent on the sinful conduct being forsaken but is rather contingent on surrendering to Jesus and accepting Him as savior. These pastors will always state that the sin can continue but that the sinner will have a desire to stop at some stage.
Due to this view these pastors will never teach the people in their congregation that the forgiveness of God is conditional on the forsaking of sinful behaviour.
The vast majority on the Christian Chat Bible Forums hold the same view I fear.
I have indeed noticed a pattern after corresponding and communicating with literally hundreds of pastors. The pattern is clearly that they are preaching the Gospel in a far different manner than that of the early church and they are also preaching a completely different message than the early church preached. They may espouse Christian terminology but the meanings are very different from what I clearly see in Scripture.
Yet is this what the Bible really teaches?
Let us reason together. What does the Bible actually teach?
These scriptures do exist in the Bible...
Isa 1:16 Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil;
Isa 1:17 Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow.
Isa 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
Isa 1:19 If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land:
Isa 1:20 But if ye refuse and rebel, ye shall be devoured with the sword: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.
Isa 55:7 Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon.
Jer 26:13 Therefore now amend your ways and your doings, and obey the voice of the LORD your God; and the LORD will repent him of the evil that he hath pronounced against you.
Pro 28:13 He that covereth his sins shall not prosper: but whoso confesseth and forsaketh them shall have mercy.
Those scriptures clearly state, without question, that the conduct of a sinner must change BEFORE God grants mercy and forgiveness. Those scriptures clearly do teach that.
Jesus clearly taught that people must repent or perish.
Luk 13:1 There were present at that season some that told him of the Galilaeans, whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices.
Luk 13:2 And Jesus answering said unto them, Suppose ye that these Galilaeans were sinners above all the Galilaeans, because they suffered such things?
Luk 13:3 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
Luk 13:4 Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and slew them, think ye that they were sinners above all men that dwelt in Jerusalem?
Luk 13:5 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
The above does, without question, teach that Jesus Christ himself taught that if one does not repent then they will most certainly perish.
The question we have to ask ourselves is what did Jesus mean by repentance? Did Jesus mean that the wicked must forsake his way and that the unrighteous must forsake their thought and return to the Lord that they not perish?
In Matthew 12:41 Jesus clearly referred to Nineveh as an example of repentance.
Mat_12:41 The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here.
If you turn to the Book of Jonah we can find reference to what Jesus was talking about. In Chapter 3 it says...
Jon 3:5 So the people of Nineveh believed God, and proclaimed a fast, and put on sackcloth, from the greatest of them even to the least of them.
Jon 3:6 For word came unto the king of Nineveh, and he arose from his throne, and he laid his robe from him, and covered him with sackcloth, and sat in ashes.
Jon 3:7 And he caused it to be proclaimed and published through Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying, Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let them not feed, nor drink water:
Jon 3:8 But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands.
Jon 3:9 Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not?
Jon 3:10 And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.
In this passage we clearly see that the people of Nineveh actually believed God (in regards to the preaching of Jonah) and that they proclaimed a fast and put on sackcloth. Even the king took off his robe and put on sackcloth and sat in ashes. The king then made sure it was proclaimed and published throughout his kingdom that the people should fast and they should turn from their evil ways.
It is also clear that in doing this the king did not presume that God would grant them a reprieve of their impending doom for he said, "who can tell of God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not."
The passage also demonstrates God seeing the deeds of these people, that they turned from their wicked ways, and God in His mercy decided to not to destroy them.
Clearly those in Nineveh "repented" and thus did not "perish."
Jonah Chapter 3 clearly lines up with Proverbs 28:13, Jer 26:13, Isa 55:7 and Isa 1. The evil conduct had to be forsaken before mercy was granted.
Is this what is being taught in the church system today? Clearly it is not because the above response from the pastor above is very typical. I have literally contracted hundreds of pastors with very similar questions and they all respond in basically the same way. I have only found FOUR exceptions who "appeared" to state that the sin must stop. Only TWO of these FOUR, upon further query, were clear and steadfast that all known evil conduct must cease before God will grant forgiveness.
I know of two other Pastors whom I did not approach by email but have actually spoken to who have told me that the all known rebellion to God must cease before forgiveness is granted.
Jesus spoke about the lost sheep and repentance in Luke Chapter 15.
Luk 15:4 What man of you, having an hundred sheep, if he lose one of them, doth not leave the ninety and nine in the wilderness, and go after that which is lost, until he find it?
Luk 15:5 And when he hath found it, he layeth it on his shoulders, rejoicing.
Luk 15:6 And when he cometh home, he calleth together his friends and neighbours, saying unto them, Rejoice with me; for I have found my sheep which was lost.
Luk 15:7 I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.
Jesus then spoke of the woman who diligently searches for the lost coin and how she rejoices when she finds that coin. Jesus connects this example to the joy in presence of the angels due to the repentant sinner who is found by God.
Luk 15:8 Either what woman having ten pieces of silver, if she lose one piece, doth not light a candle, and sweep the house, and seek diligently till she find it?
Luk 15:9 And when she hath found it, she calleth her friends and her neighbours together, saying, Rejoice with me; for I have found the piece which I had lost.
Luk 15:10 Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.
After all God is very patient and does not want any sinners to perish, He would prefer they all come to repentance. Repent or perish just like in Luke 15.
2Pe_3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
As we look further in Luke 15 we see Jesus then give the parable of the Prodigal Son. In the parable the son was lost and dead (Luk 15:32) yet he was found and made alive (Luk 15:32).
When the prodigal son was in his dead state did he do anything that could be related to this repentance we looked at so far? Let's take a look.
We first see that at the start of the parable that the son is with the father yet he wants to go and do his own thing (Luk 15:12). Thus he leaves his father and goes far away and wastes his substance with riotous living (Luk 15:13). Due to this lifestyle he ends up in a mess and finds himself in a pig pen, an especially filthy outcome in the context of a Jewish parable because swine is considered unclean.
Yet what happened then? Well let's take a look at what Jesus said...
Luk 15:17 And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger!
Luk 15:18 I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee,
Luk 15:19 And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of thy hired servants.
In the above passage we see that the son had a change of mind. He came to his senses. He recognised that he was in a mess and that he would have been much better off had he stayed with his father, even the servants had it better than he did.
He then made a decision to do something. What did he decide to do? He decided that he would go back to his father and confess his sinful conduct and that we was not worthy to be called his son, he would plead to be made a lowly servant.
Is this all that happened? Let's read on as Jesus continues...
Luk 15:20 And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him.
Luk 15:21 And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am no more worthy to be called thy son.
The son actually got up out of the pig pen and went back to the father. Yet when he was still a great way off the Father responded. The Father did not wait for him to come all the way home, the father saw what the son was doing and responded with mercy and then restored him.
Luk 15:22 But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet:
Luk 15:23 And bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry:
Luk 15:24 For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry.
Does this parable fit the pattern of Ninveh? Does this parable fit the pattern of Isa 55:7, Jer 26:13, Isa 1, Pro 28:13? Does this parable fit the context of the first few verses of Luke where Jesus speaks about that which is lost being found? Did that which was lost have to do anything?
I think the answer to all those questions is self evident. The answers are very obvious.
Yet if you bring this message into the church system, the message that a sinner must forsake their rebellion and return to God (yield to Him) as a CONDITION THAT MUST BE MET in order that forgiveness be granted by God you will be met with very strong resistance.
The modern Church System objects to this message because they do not preach repentance in this way. They preach repentance in such a way that a sinner simply must have a "desire" to forsake their sin and thus the actual forsaking of the evil conduct is not a condition that must be met before mercy is granted.
One of the common objections I find is people will accuse me of trying to establish my own righteousness and therefore this teaching of "having to forsake all known rebellion in repentance" actually nullifies or cancels out the grace of God. A common view is that if one were able to actually forsake their rebellion (like the prodigal son) then they would not need Jesus.
Is the above paragraph an accurate representation of the repentance I have clearly illustrated above with Scripture? Is the forsaking of rebellion to God as a condition for forgiveness to be granted really an act of self-righteousness?
Many will often quote Isa 64:5 which says this...
Isa 64:6 But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.
That verse is used to support the premise that ANYTHING you try to do is as a filthy rag before God. Is that true?
Is Isaiah speaking in the context of Abel of whom the Bible says this...
Heb 11:4 By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.
Gen 4:4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:
Was the offering of Abel to God as filthy rags in His sight?
Abel obtained witness that he was righteous by his faith as did Abraham..
Rom 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
...
Rom 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Both Abel and Abraham were justified by a FAITH THAT WORKED or in other words a WORKING FAITH.
Jas 2:20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
Jas 2:21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
Jas 2:24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
I think it is pretty clear the that Isa 64:6 is in the context that when men try to establish their own righteousness APART from the righteousness of God then it is as filthy rags. God is the source of righteousness and not ourselves, hence rebellion to God is unrighteous.
Yet what about Rom 4:2,4 and 6 which state that justification/righteousness is not of works...
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
Rom 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
Rom 4:4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.
Rom 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,
Question:-
I have a question regarding pornography addiction and Christianity.
Does an individual who is addicted to pornography have to stop viewing pornography before God will forgive them?
If they do have to stop then how is this achieved?
If they do not have to stop then is it necessary that it stop at some stage in the future?
Thank you for your time.
Scott.
I have a question regarding pornography addiction and Christianity.
Does an individual who is addicted to pornography have to stop viewing pornography before God will forgive them?
If they do have to stop then how is this achieved?
If they do not have to stop then is it necessary that it stop at some stage in the future?
Thank you for your time.
Scott.
Dear Scott,
The main issue in the scenario you describe is has an individual surrendered their life to the Lord Jesus and accepted Him as their Lord and Savior. God’s forgiveness knows no bounds and is only conditional on our forgiving others. When a person is in bondage to an addiction, my personal belief is the only avenue of deliverance from that addiction is through the power of God through salvation.
The issue with me would not be whether or not a person had completely abandoned an addiction, but is there a desire to do so and are they willing to be accountable.
This applies not only to the addiction to pornography, but to anything that controls our life more than the Lord Jesus (alcohol, drugs, sex, money, power…etc.)
I hope this helps to answer your question and I pray for God’s mercy and grace.
In the Service of the King,
XXXX
Abundant Life Church
The main issue in the scenario you describe is has an individual surrendered their life to the Lord Jesus and accepted Him as their Lord and Savior. God’s forgiveness knows no bounds and is only conditional on our forgiving others. When a person is in bondage to an addiction, my personal belief is the only avenue of deliverance from that addiction is through the power of God through salvation.
The issue with me would not be whether or not a person had completely abandoned an addiction, but is there a desire to do so and are they willing to be accountable.
This applies not only to the addiction to pornography, but to anything that controls our life more than the Lord Jesus (alcohol, drugs, sex, money, power…etc.)
I hope this helps to answer your question and I pray for God’s mercy and grace.
In the Service of the King,
XXXX
Abundant Life Church
They will say that mercy and forgiveness is not contingent on the sinful conduct being forsaken but is rather contingent on surrendering to Jesus and accepting Him as savior. These pastors will always state that the sin can continue but that the sinner will have a desire to stop at some stage.
Due to this view these pastors will never teach the people in their congregation that the forgiveness of God is conditional on the forsaking of sinful behaviour.
The vast majority on the Christian Chat Bible Forums hold the same view I fear.
I have indeed noticed a pattern after corresponding and communicating with literally hundreds of pastors. The pattern is clearly that they are preaching the Gospel in a far different manner than that of the early church and they are also preaching a completely different message than the early church preached. They may espouse Christian terminology but the meanings are very different from what I clearly see in Scripture.
Yet is this what the Bible really teaches?
Let us reason together. What does the Bible actually teach?
These scriptures do exist in the Bible...
Isa 1:16 Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil;
Isa 1:17 Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow.
Isa 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
Isa 1:19 If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land:
Isa 1:20 But if ye refuse and rebel, ye shall be devoured with the sword: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.
Isa 55:7 Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon.
Jer 26:13 Therefore now amend your ways and your doings, and obey the voice of the LORD your God; and the LORD will repent him of the evil that he hath pronounced against you.
Pro 28:13 He that covereth his sins shall not prosper: but whoso confesseth and forsaketh them shall have mercy.
Those scriptures clearly state, without question, that the conduct of a sinner must change BEFORE God grants mercy and forgiveness. Those scriptures clearly do teach that.
Jesus clearly taught that people must repent or perish.
Luk 13:1 There were present at that season some that told him of the Galilaeans, whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices.
Luk 13:2 And Jesus answering said unto them, Suppose ye that these Galilaeans were sinners above all the Galilaeans, because they suffered such things?
Luk 13:3 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
Luk 13:4 Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and slew them, think ye that they were sinners above all men that dwelt in Jerusalem?
Luk 13:5 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
The above does, without question, teach that Jesus Christ himself taught that if one does not repent then they will most certainly perish.
The question we have to ask ourselves is what did Jesus mean by repentance? Did Jesus mean that the wicked must forsake his way and that the unrighteous must forsake their thought and return to the Lord that they not perish?
In Matthew 12:41 Jesus clearly referred to Nineveh as an example of repentance.
Mat_12:41 The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here.
If you turn to the Book of Jonah we can find reference to what Jesus was talking about. In Chapter 3 it says...
Jon 3:5 So the people of Nineveh believed God, and proclaimed a fast, and put on sackcloth, from the greatest of them even to the least of them.
Jon 3:6 For word came unto the king of Nineveh, and he arose from his throne, and he laid his robe from him, and covered him with sackcloth, and sat in ashes.
Jon 3:7 And he caused it to be proclaimed and published through Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying, Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let them not feed, nor drink water:
Jon 3:8 But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands.
Jon 3:9 Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not?
Jon 3:10 And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.
In this passage we clearly see that the people of Nineveh actually believed God (in regards to the preaching of Jonah) and that they proclaimed a fast and put on sackcloth. Even the king took off his robe and put on sackcloth and sat in ashes. The king then made sure it was proclaimed and published throughout his kingdom that the people should fast and they should turn from their evil ways.
It is also clear that in doing this the king did not presume that God would grant them a reprieve of their impending doom for he said, "who can tell of God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not."
The passage also demonstrates God seeing the deeds of these people, that they turned from their wicked ways, and God in His mercy decided to not to destroy them.
Clearly those in Nineveh "repented" and thus did not "perish."
Jonah Chapter 3 clearly lines up with Proverbs 28:13, Jer 26:13, Isa 55:7 and Isa 1. The evil conduct had to be forsaken before mercy was granted.
Is this what is being taught in the church system today? Clearly it is not because the above response from the pastor above is very typical. I have literally contracted hundreds of pastors with very similar questions and they all respond in basically the same way. I have only found FOUR exceptions who "appeared" to state that the sin must stop. Only TWO of these FOUR, upon further query, were clear and steadfast that all known evil conduct must cease before God will grant forgiveness.
I know of two other Pastors whom I did not approach by email but have actually spoken to who have told me that the all known rebellion to God must cease before forgiveness is granted.
Jesus spoke about the lost sheep and repentance in Luke Chapter 15.
Luk 15:4 What man of you, having an hundred sheep, if he lose one of them, doth not leave the ninety and nine in the wilderness, and go after that which is lost, until he find it?
Luk 15:5 And when he hath found it, he layeth it on his shoulders, rejoicing.
Luk 15:6 And when he cometh home, he calleth together his friends and neighbours, saying unto them, Rejoice with me; for I have found my sheep which was lost.
Luk 15:7 I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.
Jesus then spoke of the woman who diligently searches for the lost coin and how she rejoices when she finds that coin. Jesus connects this example to the joy in presence of the angels due to the repentant sinner who is found by God.
Luk 15:8 Either what woman having ten pieces of silver, if she lose one piece, doth not light a candle, and sweep the house, and seek diligently till she find it?
Luk 15:9 And when she hath found it, she calleth her friends and her neighbours together, saying, Rejoice with me; for I have found the piece which I had lost.
Luk 15:10 Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.
After all God is very patient and does not want any sinners to perish, He would prefer they all come to repentance. Repent or perish just like in Luke 15.
2Pe_3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
As we look further in Luke 15 we see Jesus then give the parable of the Prodigal Son. In the parable the son was lost and dead (Luk 15:32) yet he was found and made alive (Luk 15:32).
When the prodigal son was in his dead state did he do anything that could be related to this repentance we looked at so far? Let's take a look.
We first see that at the start of the parable that the son is with the father yet he wants to go and do his own thing (Luk 15:12). Thus he leaves his father and goes far away and wastes his substance with riotous living (Luk 15:13). Due to this lifestyle he ends up in a mess and finds himself in a pig pen, an especially filthy outcome in the context of a Jewish parable because swine is considered unclean.
Yet what happened then? Well let's take a look at what Jesus said...
Luk 15:17 And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger!
Luk 15:18 I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee,
Luk 15:19 And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of thy hired servants.
In the above passage we see that the son had a change of mind. He came to his senses. He recognised that he was in a mess and that he would have been much better off had he stayed with his father, even the servants had it better than he did.
He then made a decision to do something. What did he decide to do? He decided that he would go back to his father and confess his sinful conduct and that we was not worthy to be called his son, he would plead to be made a lowly servant.
Is this all that happened? Let's read on as Jesus continues...
Luk 15:20 And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him.
Luk 15:21 And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am no more worthy to be called thy son.
The son actually got up out of the pig pen and went back to the father. Yet when he was still a great way off the Father responded. The Father did not wait for him to come all the way home, the father saw what the son was doing and responded with mercy and then restored him.
Luk 15:22 But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet:
Luk 15:23 And bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry:
Luk 15:24 For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry.
Does this parable fit the pattern of Ninveh? Does this parable fit the pattern of Isa 55:7, Jer 26:13, Isa 1, Pro 28:13? Does this parable fit the context of the first few verses of Luke where Jesus speaks about that which is lost being found? Did that which was lost have to do anything?
I think the answer to all those questions is self evident. The answers are very obvious.
Yet if you bring this message into the church system, the message that a sinner must forsake their rebellion and return to God (yield to Him) as a CONDITION THAT MUST BE MET in order that forgiveness be granted by God you will be met with very strong resistance.
The modern Church System objects to this message because they do not preach repentance in this way. They preach repentance in such a way that a sinner simply must have a "desire" to forsake their sin and thus the actual forsaking of the evil conduct is not a condition that must be met before mercy is granted.
One of the common objections I find is people will accuse me of trying to establish my own righteousness and therefore this teaching of "having to forsake all known rebellion in repentance" actually nullifies or cancels out the grace of God. A common view is that if one were able to actually forsake their rebellion (like the prodigal son) then they would not need Jesus.
Is the above paragraph an accurate representation of the repentance I have clearly illustrated above with Scripture? Is the forsaking of rebellion to God as a condition for forgiveness to be granted really an act of self-righteousness?
Many will often quote Isa 64:5 which says this...
Isa 64:6 But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.
That verse is used to support the premise that ANYTHING you try to do is as a filthy rag before God. Is that true?
Is Isaiah speaking in the context of Abel of whom the Bible says this...
Heb 11:4 By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.
Gen 4:4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:
Was the offering of Abel to God as filthy rags in His sight?
Abel obtained witness that he was righteous by his faith as did Abraham..
Rom 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
...
Rom 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Both Abel and Abraham were justified by a FAITH THAT WORKED or in other words a WORKING FAITH.
Jas 2:20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
Jas 2:21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
Jas 2:24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
I think it is pretty clear the that Isa 64:6 is in the context that when men try to establish their own righteousness APART from the righteousness of God then it is as filthy rags. God is the source of righteousness and not ourselves, hence rebellion to God is unrighteous.
Yet what about Rom 4:2,4 and 6 which state that justification/righteousness is not of works...
Rom 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
Rom 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
Rom 4:4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.
Rom 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
Rom 4:6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,