Hate Crimes Legislation

[zone]

Hate speech is, outside the law, communication that vilifies a person or a group on the basis of one or more characteristics such as color, disability, ethnicity, gender, nationality, race, religion, and sexual orientation.[1][2]

In law, hate speech is any speech, gesture or conduct, writing, or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group.

The law may identify a protected individual or a protected group by disability, ethnicity, gender, gender identity, nationality, religion, race, sexual orientation,[3][4] or other characteristic.[5][6] In some countries, a victim of hate speech may seek redress under civil law, criminal law, or both. A website that uses hate speech is called a hate site. Most of these sites contain Internet forums and news briefs that emphasize a particular viewpoint. There has been debate over how freedom of speech applies to the Internet.

Critics have argued that the term "hate speech" is a modern example of Newspeak, used to silence critics of social policies that have been poorly implemented in a rush to appear politically correct.[7][8][9]

Hate speech - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < click

"In August 2003, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) announced the results of their $1.2 million taxpayer-funded study. It stated, essentially, that traditionalists are mentally disturbed. Scholars from the Universities of Maryland, California at Berkeley, and Stanford had determined that social conservatives, in particular, suffer from ‘mental rigidity,’ ‘dogmatism,’ and ‘uncertainty avoidance,’ together with associated indicators for mental illness."

Source: B.K. Eakman, Chronicles, October 2004, pp. 28-29.
"Political conservatism as motivated social cognition" By Jost, John T.; Glaser, Jack; Kruglanski, Arie W.; Sulloway, Frank J. APA Psychological Bulletin, May 2003, Vol 129(3), p 339-375

 

[zone]

Hate Crimes Bill Sets Dangerous Precedent
Apr 29 2009
Washington, Apr 29 -

Congressman Doug Lamborn (CO-05) issued the following statement today regarding passage of H.R. 1913, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009. Lamborn voted ‘No’ on H.R. 1913.

“Our laws criminalize actions, not thoughts or beliefs. Criminalizing thoughts sets a dangerous precedent. It turns government into thought police.

“It could also restrict free speech and lead to criminal prosecution of religious leaders or anyone who expresses politically incorrect statements, including religious beliefs.”—Congressman Doug Lamborn (CO-05)

Congressman Doug Lamborn : 2009 Press Releases : Hate Crimes Bill Sets Dangerous Precedent < click

"Every child in America entering school at the age of five is insane because he comes to school with certain allegiances to our founding fathers, toward our elected officials, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It’s up to you as teachers to make all these sick children well – by creating the international child of the future"

Dr. Chester M. Pierce, Psychiatrist, address to the Childhood International Education Seminar, 1973

 

[zone]

"The ideological roots of the Scientific Dictatorship can be traced to the works of Plato some 2,000 years ago. In truth, humanity has been battling the formation of this tyranny for much of known history. The formation of the United States Constitution created a barrier that H. G. Wells wrote in 1901, had “…to be modified or shelved at some stage…” The focus here is on the modern forms of scientific power that began in the 20th Century and are blossoming in the 21st Century. The Scientific Dictatorship is composed of unelected individuals that have access to the reigns of power. These individuals have access to undisclosed future technology, classified intelligence, and the ability to steer scientific research that impacts our entire society.

The works of Bertrand Russel, Julian Huxley, Aldous Huxley, Charles Galton Darwin, H.G. Wells and many others provide the mental framework from which this modern tyranny is based upon. The following are several examples of men who helped form the Scientific Dictatorship of the 21st Century. For readers who are new to this information, what you see here is a small portion of the full kaleidoscope of information available. This will give you a start for any in-depth research that you should decide to do."

The Scientific Dictatorship Explained | Old-Thinker News < click

"Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished ... The social psychologist of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at: first, that influences of the home are 'obstructive' and verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective ... It is for the future scientist to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen."

Bertrand Russell quoting Johann Gottlieb Fichte, the head of philosophy & psychology who influenced Hegel and others – Prussian University in Berlin, 1810


2+2=5

 

[Nautilus]

well judgind how abortion is legal but animal tortue is not, and its doubtful it will become legal this is once again a terrible argument. Youre picking things that dont effect me because the example youre using is not legal in the first place.

 

[zone]

well judgind how abortion is legal but animal tortue is not, and its doubtful it will become legal this is once again a terrible argument. Youre picking things that dont effect me because the example youre using is not legal in the first place.

see how "Legal" is antiGod?
why do babies not have rights equal to animals?

and did you know TPTB have said animals have more rights than ALL OF US?

anyways, Naut...i know where you stand.
and i do respect that you are consistent.

you're not helping anyone though Naut.
there's wrath coming....we need to understand the Gospel better.
bye for now

 

[tribesman]

Keep eyes open for FOXman, ADL, SPLC and the likes...AND...professing christians being deceived by same.

Take care.

 

[zone]

Keep eyes open for FOXman, ADL, SPLC and the likes...AND...professing christians being deceived by same.

Take care.

"Adorno had practiced what he preached. During the 1940s, he had ventured to Hollywood, where he teamed up with Igor Stravinsky to compose motion picture scores. In Hollywood, Adorno and Stravinsky were part of the "British Set," a collection of avant-garde cultural degenerates which also included:

Aldous Huxley, whose fictional and non-fiction writings propagandized for the use of brainwashing and psychotropic drugs to pacify whole societies, and create "concentration camps without tears"

Christopher Isherwood, author of the Berlin Diaries (later adapted for the stage as Cabaret), which promoted that degenerate Weimar culture of drugs and perversion that helped usher Hitler into power.

Alexander Korda, protege of Frankfurt School founder Georg Lukacs, later a leading figure in Britain's wartime Special Operations Executive (SOE) and a leading Hollywood movie producer.

The "British Set," particularly Isherwood, were the "Hollywood connection" for British literary perverts W.H. Auden and Stephen Spender, who would play pivotal roles in the CCF, and, later, in the 1960s Counterculture project, in league with such Frankfurt School cultural icons as Herbert Marcuse and Erich Fromm.

Adorno had written his Philosophy of Modern Music prescription for producing a society of necrophiliacs through the perversion of music and culture while also working with Horkheimer on The Authoritarian Personality. This effort was, at the time, the most ambitious mass social profiling of the American public ever undertaken. The project, part of the larger Studies in Prejudice series, financed by the American Jewish Committee, aimed at "proving" that the American people, despite their heroic sacrifices to defeat Hitler and Mussolini, were intrinsically fascist and anti-Semitic, and that advanced techniques of psychological manipulation were vital and justified for purging the populace of these evil, "authoritarian" impulses. The two key weapons for this cultural lobotomy: Conformity and Eros, or what is known today as the tyranny of "political correctness."

"http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/the-americas/2006/02/23/schizophrenia-and-necrophilia.php < click

 

[Anonimous]

But they are doing it everyday. If a sin was a sin 3000 years ago it is still sin today. Of course today we call it by differebt names...Adultery=affair/Homsexuality=aletrnate life style/ etc. I guess when it come right down to it...and it will soon...we will have to ask ourselves who we are willing to follow. Jesus we can't serve 2 masters. I think the number of "christians" who will give in and compromise will be surprisingly high.