There is no valid reason to assume he did anything well nor is there any reason to assume he did poorly. If they cheated on him they did a clear and clean cut wrong which there is no excuse for. Whatever happened, he was wronged. If he wasn't a guy there's be an outcry of support for him. Because he is a guy people find it socially acceptable to blame him even without any evidence of wrongdoing.
You know next to nothing about his process in choosing someone. What you do know is that he looked for what should be generally good characteristics of churchgoing and bible study. You also know next to nothing about his behaviour in these marriages. A decently reasonable individual would assume nothing, neither that he did wrong nor that he did right. That's called good sense. You're common sense defaults to being accusatory and quite malicious. Your sense is not, however, realism. Decent realism takes pains to avoid snap judgment.
You know next to nothing about his process in choosing someone. What you do know is that he looked for what should be generally good characteristics of churchgoing and bible study. You also know next to nothing about his behaviour in these marriages. A decently reasonable individual would assume nothing, neither that he did wrong nor that he did right. That's called good sense. You're common sense defaults to being accusatory and quite malicious. Your sense is not, however, realism. Decent realism takes pains to avoid snap judgment.