Which brings to mind this little ditty ...
[video=youtube;sChJUaU5W9I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sChJUaU5W9I&list=HL1361913886&feature=mh_l olz[/video]
That's my favorite video also. I saw it in church last year
Which brings to mind this little ditty ...
[video=youtube;sChJUaU5W9I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sChJUaU5W9I&list=HL1361913886&feature=mh_l olz[/video]
You missed my whole point.
IF all of the covenant of abraham, As ZONE DEMANDS, speaks of salvation and is salvic in nature. Then ALL Isreal is saved, no matter if they recieve Christ or not.
IF however, it was just a land covenant, and promises of blessings HERE ON EARTH to them, then it is not salvic in nature, and zones defense and arguments fall on their face.
Yep. . .because the Roman kingdom was also a type of Satan's kingdom.
The literal prophecy of the fall of Rome was fulfilled.
It's symbolic fulfillment is in Christ's kingdom overthrowing Satan's kingdom.
No problem exists with the time frame in this prophecy.
That's a nice revision and minimization of the NT record of Israel's unbelief.
Your chronology is a little confused.
Where in the gospels did Jesus tell the Jewish nation they were to give the gospel to the Gentiles?
The Mosaic laws of defilement separated the Jews from the Gentiles.
Those defilement laws were not set aside (Heb 7:18-19) until Jesus' Jewish enemies had him killed by the Romans.
God's judgment on Israel's unbelief was not because it kept them from giving the gospel to the Gentiles.
God judgment on unbelieving Israel was about rejecting his Messiah,
which is the reason why they are still under God's judgment of blindness today.
The final kingdom in Da 2 is God's kingdom of 2:44.
The fourth kingdom, which the fifth kingdom of God destroys, is the Roman kingdom, which is also a type of Satan's kingdom, which is crushed by the kingdom of God.
The prophecy was fullfilled both literally and typically.
those requirements must have been met because supposedly they are back in the Land.
what requirements did they meet?
what happens in the 1,000 years if its got no Temple?
what Throne will Jesus be on, and where will it be?
The messianic kingdom is the fifth kingdom of Da 2:44, which endures forever.
It was set up during the time of the fourth king, the Roman empire which conquered the Greek empire (2:39; 8:31), at Christ's first coming.
The kingdom Christ set up during the Roman empire endures forever.
There is not another future earthly Messianic kingdom to come,
nor is one found in apostolic teaching.
That was fulfilled in Josh 21:43-45:
"So the Lord gave Israel all the land he had sworn to their forefathers, and they took possession (not full habitation) of it and settled there. The LORD gave them rest on every side, just as he had sworn to their forefathers. Not one of their enemies withstood them; the LORD handed all their enemies over to them. Not one of the LORD'S good promises to the house of Israel failed; every one was fulfilled."
i for one believe God forgives anyone who is repentant and acknowledges Jesus as King and Lord and Messiah, and obeys the Gospel.
and hopefully understands that also means becoming part of His Body, His Church.
jew or gentile. jews repent and become christians today. my best friend is proof.
no other NAME.
no other PROMISE.
You'll have to ask the ones who believe it.
I don't believe it, so you're asking the wrong person.
Hey, this thread is so good and I missed it all. Don't feel bad...Glad I stayed out, for Elin, Abiding, Pilgrimer, and you Zone did a great job in articulating the truth...A lot better then I could ever do, however EG has a hard shell. Now I know none of my threads took off, lol.That's ok, it's not about me..
EG, I commend you for sticking in thus far and taking the bunches. I love you bro. Peace
Well, then. . .
"Houston, we've got a problem."
Because God promised the land to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, personally (Ge 17:8, 26:3, 35:12), but none of them ever possessed a foot of ground there (Ac 7:5), so God did not keep his promise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Are you sure about that?
Wow.. I take it you do not study much? you should try studying more.
I will open a thread on it.Ive needed to study this more for quite awhile
chapter 17 seems the land is brought into a conditional
covenant with circumcision. Dont bother answering
i just need to do more homework.![]()
yet again you totally misrepresent what I said.. I was talking about the gentile kingdoms.. you know. they iron and clay??
1st off. get off this type stuff. You sound alot like scofield and darby which is scary.
The forth kingdom (rome) or kingdom of Iron, was in power in Christ's day, and it was this kingdom which destroyed the city of jerusalem and the temple.
The final of that kingdom was not yet in power yet.. Thus it was yet to come.
while your right, this kingdom is the one destroyed by Christ. and his kingdom.. You have failed to prove it has appeared yet.
Oh wait, You can;t so you symbolize it (rolls eyes)
God did not tell us to typify its interpretation. Daniel made it clear.
[SUP]43 [/SUP]As you saw iron mixed with ceramic clay, they will mingle with the seed of men; but they will not adhere to one another, just as iron does not mix with clay. [SUP]44 [/SUP]And in the days of these kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed; and the kingdom shall not be left to other people; it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever. [SUP]45 [/SUP]Inasmuch as you saw that the stone was cut out of the mountain without hands, and that it broke in pieces the iron, the bronze, the clay, the silver, and the gold—the great God has made known to the king what will come to pass after this. The dream is certain, and its interpretation is sure.”
Kings are not to be symbolized. they are literal kings. Daniel told him, THESE THINGS WILL COME TO PASS.. Nothing but a literal interpretation will suffice.
We do not symbolize prophesy just because our belief does not fit the literal interpretation.
Oldie, but goodie.Really! I can only conclude that people who believe a mortal man can rise up and rebel in the presence of Christ in all his glory simply have no idea just how glorious Jesus Christ really is. Jeesh, the one man on earth who knew Jesus best, who had laid his head on Jesus' breast, ate with him, slept alongside him, heard him teach and preach and saw his miracles first hand, saw him resurrected, but he got one look at the Glorified Christ and he collapses in a dead faint at his feet. And that's Jesus' friend!
I think when Jesus returns to this old sin-weary world, in all his glory, the very brightness of his presence will be a burning, consuming fire before which the elements will melt and the cosmos will be dissolved.
Puny mortal bits of clay rise up in the presence of the Glorified One??? Why, even the powers of hell tremble just at his name.
So I agree zone ... ain't gonna happen!
Which brings to mind this little ditty ...
[video=youtube;sChJUaU5W9I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sChJUaU5W9I&list=HL1361913886&feature=mh_l olz[/video]
In Christ,
Pilgrimer
Love the shoes!Oh my, titanic shift! As many times as I've read that verse I never saw that ...
View attachment 41246
In Christ,
Pilgrimer
The Roman empire is the fourth kingdom.wow. talk about private interpretation.
So the first 4 kingdoms were literally fulfilled.
Yet the final kingdom is just a symbol.
Yep, God is a liar.
when he says forever, he does not mean it..