Recent content by IsaiahA

Apparently a moderator refused a post I submitted so I'll place it here. This will be my last because it is tiring to deal with such irrational people with no reading comprehension. As an 81 y.o., patience is not my strongest grace. I sat under the preaching of dispensationalism for the first...

I'll quote Josh 21:43-45 and then the statement from MacArthur's Study Bible - "Thus the LORD gave to Israel all the land that he swore to their ancestors that he would give them; and having taken possession of it, they settled there. And the LORD gave them rest on every side just as he had...

Thank God for the true Bible scholars of centuries ago, such as Matthew Poole (1624-1679) who comments on Gen. 13:15 in his commentary - Object. Abram could see but a little part of the land. Answ. 1. He might now possibly be upon a mountain, from whence he might have a large prospect every...

I find it incomprehensible how anyone can call themselves a Bible-believing Christian and say Joshua contains lies. Here is what is recorded by Joshua: "Thus the LORD gave to Israel all the land which he swore to give to their fathers; and having taken possession of it, they settled there. And...

Israel's land promise already fulfilled & completed: Gen. 15:18-21; Josh 21:43-45, 23:14-16; Ex. 23:27-30; Num. 34:1-12; 1 Kgs 4:20,21; 2 Chr. 9:22-28; Neh. 9:23, 24 I'm leaving on a trip, but even when at home I do not stay always on the Internet. When it takes such gymnastics to reject the...

Again, prove your argument from scripture, not throwing about a label that is apparently coined by the modernists, called dispensationalists.... arriving on the scene in the latter 1800s!

Try addressing the scriptures instead of throwing about a label.

NO, this thread is not about the modern straw man of "Replacement Theology", but this is a label placed on the historical Christian understanding of the Bible by the church. The weird theology of dispensationalism never showed up until the latter 1800s. I was accused earlier in this thread of...

Give me the verse in Romans chapter 11 where you find "after which". I've checked several translations and do not find that phrase anywhere in the book of Romans.

Peter Pett's Commentary on 1 Pet. 2:9 shows the church to be a continuation of true Israel, a succession of Israel; NOT A REPLACEMENT! The OT prophets spoke of the New Covenant assembly, NOT some renewed Jewish state in our future. This is just a portion of Pett's comments. "But you are a...

There is NO "after which" in that passage! "Lest you be wise in your own conceits, I want you to understand this mystery, brethren: a hardening has come upon part of Israel, until the full number of the Gentiles come in, and so all Israel will be saved; as it is written, 'The Deliverer will...

I do not believe the New Covenant people of God, the assemblies of Christ "replaced" Israel, the OT people of God. Believers, the New Covenant people of God are a continuation of the Old Covenant people of God. The Old Covenant is past, not to be brought back! "Circumcision is nothing...

It is important to keep in mind that the word "church" is an ecclesiastical word not found in the Hebrew or Greek of the Bible. In a literal translation the words are rendered "assembly" or "congregation". God's people in both testaments are referred to as assembly or congregation. In the...

For those who label me "anti-Semitic" for not embracing Israel as Bible prophecy, read it from a Jew. "The relatively new concept of Zionism began only about one hundred years ago and since that time Torah-true Jewry has steadfastly opposed the Zionist ideology. This struggle is rooted in two...

I have hoped Ron DeSantis will run for the GOP nomination and win it. If DeSantis did not make it, I was willing to support Trump again as I have twice before. But now, for me, if Trump is the nominee, I will sit out the '24 election. I listened to Steve Bannon's War Room this afternoon and...