Reactions received by Kavik
-
YWell, there may indeed by a heavenly language, but it’s most certainly not modern T-speech. There’s just absolutely nothing about it...
-
YSurely something that momentous (if one argues that it had to have occurred ), even if only a fraction of these individuals started to...
-
Assuming parts are not completely redefined (as they were by the early Pentecostal church) to justify a modern phenomenon (tongues-speech) .
-
Yes, and they're all written and recited in a real, rational language. -
It is very likely that Paul was drawing off of the Jewish religious custom and tradition (earliest “documentation” of this tradition may...
-
GYes, and they're all written and recited in a real, rational language.
-
BThe Syriac seems to do the same thing as the KJV only from a different angle. Paul's letter was written in Greek. The words he used was...
-
BWell, not quite - Syriac is a later development from Aramaic. Some of its speakers call it Aramaic or Neo-Aramaic, but it's not quite...
-
No, but the Pentecostal doctrine on tongues was completely redefined between 1906 and 1907. Xenoglossy one day, 'prayer language' the next.
-
Completely agree. Not sure about other countries, but even here in the US, again, not sure about other areas, but in northern New... -
You are if you're the only person at that public worship who understands that language. In that case, you are not speaking to men, but... -
Dino246 reacted
to Kavik's post in the thread The truth about tongues: a DIVISIVE force in Christianity today.
You do realize "unknown" was added to the text right? What the KJV has as "unknown tongue" should be read simply as "language". The... -
Bbillabong reacted to Kavik's post in the thread The truth about tongues: a DIVISIVE force in Christianity today.
You can't be serious? Are you even aware of the reason why "unknown" was inserted before 'tongues' in the first place?
-
Bbillabong reacted
to Kavik's post in the thread The truth about tongues: a DIVISIVE force in Christianity today.
The phrase unknown tongues, of the English Bible has a tradition that dates back to the earliest days of the Reformation. Most... -
Angela53510 reacted to Kavik's post in the thread The truth about tongues: a DIVISIVE force in Christianity today.
You can't be serious? Are you even aware of the reason why "unknown" was inserted before 'tongues' in the first place? -
Angela53510 reacted to Kavik's post in the thread The truth about tongues: a DIVISIVE force in Christianity today.
To the list you can also add linguist William Samarin and anthropologist Felicitas Goodman. Both did a considerable amount of work with...
-
Nehemiah6 reacted to Kavik's post in the thread The truth about tongues: a DIVISIVE force in Christianity today.
To the list you can also add linguist William Samarin and anthropologist Felicitas Goodman. Both did a considerable amount of work with... -
Angela53510 reacted to Kavik's post in the thread The truth about tongues: a DIVISIVE force in Christianity today.
To add a bit - modern tongues-speech, non-cognitive non-language utterance, is actually not gibberish. Gibberish by its nature does not...
-
Angela53510 reacted to Kavik's post in the thread The truth about tongues: a DIVISIVE force in Christianity today.
Perhaps you could post a short sound clip - about a minute - of your tongues-speech?
-
Angela53510 reacted to Kavik's post in the thread The truth about tongues: a DIVISIVE force in Christianity today.
How do you reconcile the Pentecostal redefinition of its tongues doctrine between 1906 and 1907?? Are you even aware that the entire...
