David Hume, a revered philosopher during the Enlightenment once stated
Epicurus's old questions are yet unanswered.
Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? then he is impotent.
Is he able, but not willing? then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil?
These words have echoed throughout the centuries since Epicurus first penned them; and a great many have attempted to provide an answer the age old question: If God, why evil?
Some have attempted to carry the more burdensome approach in attempting to justify God's allowance of evil which is known as a Theodicy. The two that are most prevalent today are the so-called "Soul-Winning" and Free Will Theodicies. Others have realized that this burden has proved too difficult to carry given our current finite position and background knowledge of the events that occur; while others have attempted to simply defend God's existence and evil. A philosophical revolution was sparked in the 1980's when Dr. Alvin Plantinga penned his paper, God, Freedom, and Evil. Since the paper got published it has influenced a great many Christian philosophers and rekindled serious debate on the question, If God, why evil? Some have said that Plantinga has effectively solved the so called "Logical" Problem of Evil, while others remain unconvinced.
Plantinga's paper has met its share of criticism from both believers and unbelievers alike due to it's inability to deal with the so-called Evidential Problem of Evil which attempts to show that the co-existence of God and evil isn't logically contradictory but God's existence is unlikely given evil.
I'm curious about the insights of those interested in this topic to give their two cents, both athiest and theist's are welcome.
Epicurus's old questions are yet unanswered.
Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? then he is impotent.
Is he able, but not willing? then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil?
These words have echoed throughout the centuries since Epicurus first penned them; and a great many have attempted to provide an answer the age old question: If God, why evil?
Some have attempted to carry the more burdensome approach in attempting to justify God's allowance of evil which is known as a Theodicy. The two that are most prevalent today are the so-called "Soul-Winning" and Free Will Theodicies. Others have realized that this burden has proved too difficult to carry given our current finite position and background knowledge of the events that occur; while others have attempted to simply defend God's existence and evil. A philosophical revolution was sparked in the 1980's when Dr. Alvin Plantinga penned his paper, God, Freedom, and Evil. Since the paper got published it has influenced a great many Christian philosophers and rekindled serious debate on the question, If God, why evil? Some have said that Plantinga has effectively solved the so called "Logical" Problem of Evil, while others remain unconvinced.
Plantinga's paper has met its share of criticism from both believers and unbelievers alike due to it's inability to deal with the so-called Evidential Problem of Evil which attempts to show that the co-existence of God and evil isn't logically contradictory but God's existence is unlikely given evil.
I'm curious about the insights of those interested in this topic to give their two cents, both athiest and theist's are welcome.