Prince William

Microchip Implants, Mindcontrol, and Cybernetics

SPEKULA, 3rd Quarter, October 23, 1999

Eleanor White's comments: Dr. Rauni Kilde, formerly the Chief Medical Officer for Lapland (northern Finland), is one of our bravest professional supporters. She was given an award from CAHRA for her appearance on a now-unavailable video by Transmedia Productions in London, England.

See the text of the award plaque at: awardlst.htm

She has given us permission to post this article, an example of the most vigorous support we have ever received. We thank Dr. Kilde most sincerely.

The following article was originally published in the 36th-year editionof the Finnish-language journal, SPEKULA (3rd Quarter, 1999). SPEKULA is a publication of Northern Finland medical students and doctors of Oulu University OLK (OULUN LAAKETIETEELLINEN KILTA).

It is mailed to all medical students of Finland and all Northern Finland medical doctors.Circulation 6500.MICROCHIP IMPLANTS, MINDCONTROL AND CYBERNETICSby Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MDFormer Chief Medical Officer of FinlandIn 1948 Norbert Weiner published a book, CYBERNETICS, defined as aneurological communication and control theory already in use in smallcircles at that time.

Yoneji Masuda, "Father of Information Society,"stated his concern in 1980 that our liberty is threatenedOrwellian-style by cybernetic technology totally unknown to mostpeople. This technology links the brains of people via implantedmicrochips to satellites controlled by ground-based super-computers.The first brain implants were surgically inserted in 1974 in the stateof Ohio, U.S.A., and also in Stockholm, Sweden.

Brain electrodes wereinserted into the skulls of babies in 1946 without the knowledge oftheir parents. In the 50's and 60's, electrical implants were insertedinto the brains of animals and humans, especially in the U.S., duringresearch into behavior modification, and brain and body functioning.Mind control (MC) methods were used in attempts to change human behaviorand attitudes. Influencing brain functions became an important goal ofmilitary and intelligence services.

Thirty years ago brain implants showed up in xrays the size of onecentimeter. Subsequent implants shrunk to the size of a grain of rice.They were made of silicon, later still of gallium arsenide. Today theyare small enough to be inserted into the neck or back, and alsointravenously in different parts of the body during surgical operations,with or without the consent of the subject.

It is now almost impossibleto detect or remove them.It is technically possible for every newborn to be injected with amicrochip, which could then function to identify the person for the restof his or her life. Such plans are secretly being discussed in the U.S.without any public airing of the privacy issues involved. In Sweden,Prime Minister Olof Palme gave permission in 1973 to implant prisoners,and Data Inspection's ex-Director General Jan Freese revealed thatnursing-home patients were implanted in the mid- 1980's.

The technologyis revealed in the 1972:47 Swedish state report, STATENS OFFICIELLAUTRADNINGER (SOU).Implanted human beings can be followed anywhere. Their brain functionscan then be remotely monitored by supercomputers and even alteredthrough the changing of frequencies. Guinea-pigs in secret experimentshave included prisoners, soldiers, mental patients, handicappedchildren, deaf and blind people, homosexuals, single women, the elderly,school children and any group of people considered "marginal" by theelite experimenters.

The published experiences of prisoners in UtahState Prison, for example, are shocking to the conscience.Today's microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves thattarget them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can betracked anywhere on the globe. Such a technique was among a numbertested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who inventedthe intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which is injected intopeople. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers were injected withthe Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline flow into thebloodstream.)

The U.S. National Security Agency's (NSA) 20 billionbits/second supercomputers could now "see and hear" what soldiersexperience in the battlefield with a remote monitoring system (RMS).When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is50 micromillometers) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it drawsneuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sightsand voice of the implanted person. Once transferred and stored in acomputer, these neuroimpulses can be projected back to the person’sbrain via the microchip to be re-experienced.

Using a RMS, a land-basedcomputer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals)to the nervous system, affecting the target's performance. With RMS,healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voicesin their heads.Every thought, reaction, hearing and visual observation causes a certainneurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and itselectromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, picturesand voices.

Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person'sbrainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular crampsexperienced as torture.The NSA's electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow andhandle millions of people.

Each of us has a unique bioelectricalresonance frequency in the brain, just like we have uniquefingerprints. With electro-magnetic frequency (EMF) brain stimulationfully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals can be sent to the brain,causing the desired voice and visual effects to be experienced by thetarget.

This is a form of electronic warfare. U.S. astronauts wereimplanted before they were sent into space so their thoughts could befollowed and all their emotions could be registered 24 hours a day.The Washington Post reported in in May 1995 that Prince William of GreatBritain was implanted at the age of 12. Thus, if he were everkidnapped, a radiowave with a specific frequency could be targeted tohis microchip. The chip’s signal would be routed through a satellite tothe computer screen of police headquarters, where the Prince’s movementscould be followed. He could actually be located anywhere on the globe.

The mass media have not reported that an implanted person's privacy vanishes for the rest of his or her life. S/he can be manipulated inmany ways. Using different frequencies, the secret controller of thisequipment can even change a person's emotional life. S/he can be madeaggressive or lethargic. Sexuality can be artificially influenced.Thought signals and subconscious thinking can be read, dreams affectedand even induced, all without theknowledge or consent of the implanted person.

A perfect cyber-soldier can thus be created. This secret technology hasbeen used by military forces in certain NATO countries since the 1980'swithout civilian and academic populations having heard anything aboutit. Thus, little information about such invasive mind-control systemsis available in professional and academic journals.

The NSA's Signals Intelligence can remotely monitor information fromhuman brains by decoding the evoked potentials (3.50HZ, 5 milliwatt)emitted by the brain. Prisoner experimentees in both Gothenburg, Swedenand Vienna, Austria have been found to have [missing word] brainlesions.

Diminished blood circulation and lack of oxygen in the righttemporal frontal lobes result where brain implants are usuallyoperative. A Finnish experimentee experienced brain atrophy andintermittent attacks of unconsciousness due to lackof oxygen.Mind control techniques can be used for political purposes.

The goal ofmind controllers today is to induce the targeted persons or groups toact against his or her own convictions and best interests. Zombifiedindividuals can even be programmed to murder and remember nothing oftheir crime afterward. Alarming examples of this phenomenon can befound in the U.S.This “silent war” is being conducted against unknowing civilians andsoldiers by military and intelligence agencies. Since 1980 electronicstimulation of the brain (ESB) has been secretly used to control peopletargeted without their knowledge or consent.

All international humanrights agreements forbid nonconsensual manipulation of human beings —even in prisons, not to speak of civilian populations. Under aninitiative of U.S. Senator John Glenn, discussions commenced in January1997 about the dangers of radiating civilian populations. Targetingpeople’s brain functions with electromagnetic fields and beams (fromhelicopters and airplanes, satellites, from parked white vans,neighboring houses, telephone poles, electrical appliances, mobilphones, TV, radio, etc.), is part of the radiation problem that shouldbe addressed in democratically elected government bodies.In addition to electronic MC, chemical methods have also been developed.Mind-altering drugs and different smelling gasses affecting brainfunction negatively can be injected into air ducts or water pipes.

Also, bacteria and viruses have been tested this way in severalcountries.Today's supertechnology, connecting our brain functions via microchips(or even without them, according to the latest technology) to computersvia satellites in the U.S. or Israel, poses the gravest threat tohumanity.

The latest supercomputers are powerful enough to monitor thewhole world’s population. What will happen when people are tempted byfalse premises to allow microchips into their bodies? One lure will be amicrochip identity card. Compulsory legislation has even been secretlyproposed in the U.S. to criminalize removal of an ID implant.

Are we ready for the robotization of mankind and the total eliminationof privacy, including freedom of thought? How many of us would want tocede our entire life, including our most secret thoughts, to BigBrother? Yet the technology exists to create a totalitarian "New WorldOrder." Covert neurological communication systems are in place tocounteract independent thinking and to control social and politicalactivity on behalf of self-serving private and military interests.

When our brain functions are already is connected to supercomputers bymeans of radio implants and microchips, it will be too late for protest. This threat can be defeated only by educating the public, using available literature on biotelemetry and information exchanged at international congresses.One reason this technology has remained a state secret is the widespreadprestige of the psychiatric DIAGNOSTIC STATISTICAL MANUAL IV produced bythe U.S. American Psychiatric Association (APA), and printed in 18languages.

Psychiatrists working for U.S. intelligence agencies nodoubt participated in writing and revising this manual. This psychiatric "bible" covers up the secret development of MC technologies by labelling some of their effects as symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia.

Victims of mind control experimentation are thus routinely diagnosed,knee-jerk fashion, as mentally ill by doctors who learned the DSM“symptom” list in medical school. Physicians have not been schooledthat patients may be telling the truth when they report being targetedagainst their will or being used as guinea pigs for electronic, chemicaland bacteriological forms of psychological warfare.Time is running out for changing the direction of military medicine, andensuring the future of human freedom.

Rauni Kilde, MDDecember 6, 2000

http://raven1.net/kilde2.htm

British Israelism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Anglo-Israelism)


British Israelism (also called Anglo-Israelism) is the belief that people of Western European descent, particularly those in Great Britain, are the direct lineal descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel.

The concept often includes the belief that the British Royal Family is directly descended from the line of King David.

There has never been a single head or an organisational structure to the movement. However, various British Israelite organisations were set up across the British Commonwealth and America from the 1870s, and many still continue to exist.[3] Adherents may hold a diverse set of beliefs and claims that are ancillary to the core genealogical theory, however there are central tenets all British Israelites follow, including Two House Theology which is the core essence of British Israelism.[4] A central teaching of the British Israelites Two House Theology is that while Jews are considered to be Israelites, not all Israelites are considered to be Jews.[5] British Israelites believe that Jews only descend from Judah (and the tribe of Benjamin), while the House of Israel (see lost ten tribes) they believe are the White British or Anglo-Saxon-Celtic kindred peoples of North-Western Europe today.[6]

Critics assert that the central tenets of British Israelism contradict modern genetic, linguistic, archeological and historical evidence (see compatibility with present-day research findings below). They are also considered to be without scientific credibility by the mainstream.[7][8] The concept and theory details have been thoroughly criticized.

British Israelism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old Testament passages which show the House of Israel (northern 10 tribes) to be distinct or separate from the House of Judah (Jews) are cited by British Israelites to support their Two House Theology. Examples include 1 Samuel 11: 8; Jeremiah 3: 18; 13: 11; 31: 31; 37; 33: 24; Ezekiel 8: 1; 14: 1.[145] British Israelites also note that the House of Israel (ten lost tribes) were never called Jewish or Jews, and that the first place the Judahites (or Jews) appear in the Bible (II Kings 6: 6) is when they were at war with the House of Israel.[146]

British Israelites believe the two 'Houses' will be united during End Times and cite the prophecies in Ezekiel chapter 37 which notes that one day the two 'Houses' will be united under a King from the stock of David (see Davidic line).

As further evidence, British Israelites cite the geographical description in Jeremiah 3: 18, which notes when the two 'Houses' will be united they will come from the far north, which British Israelites interpret to mean Northern Europe or Britain.[147]

British Israelism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Davidic origin of British monarchy

Main article: List of legendary kings of Britain#Tea Tephi
One of the core beliefs of British Israelism is that the British monarchy are lineal descendants from King David (see Davidic line).[205] British Israelites cite I Kings 9: 5; I Chron. 17: 12, II Chron, 17: 18 and II Sam. 7: 13 which state that the throne of King David over Israel will be established forever.[206]

However the idea that the early British or Irish kings descended from King David is found in numerous early writings from the Early Modern Period, not solely British Israelite literature, for example Vincenzo Galilei's Dialogue of Ancient and Modern Music (1581) notes Galilei's belief that the Irish descend from King David.[12] The idea however became prevalent and central to British Israelite teaching in the 19th century.[205] John Wilson and Edward Hine briefly touched on the subject in their works, but the first thorough research and attempt to link King David to the British monarchy was conducted by Revd F. R. A. Glover, M.A., of London who in 1861 published England, the Remnant of Judah, and the Israel of Ephraim.[207]

Glover in 1861 claimed that the Irish princess Tea Tephi was one of Zedekiah's daughters. Since King Zedekiah of Judah had all his sons killed during the Babylonian Captivity no male successors could continue the bloodline of King David, but as Glover noted Zedekiah had daughters who escaped death (Jeremiah 43: 6).[208] Glover believed that Tea Tephi was a surviving Judahite princess who had escaped and traveled to Ireland, and who married a local High King of Ireland in the 6th century BC.[209] This theory was later expanded upon by Rev. A.B. Grimaldi who published in 1877 a successful chart entitled Pedigree of Queen Victoria from the Bible Kings and later by W.M.H. Milner in his booklet The Royal House of Britain an Enduring Dynasty (1902, revised 1909). The latter work has been republished in over 30 editions, and is still sold by Covenant Publishing.[210]

A collection of bardic traditions and Irish manuscripts which detail Tea Tephi were also published by J. A. Goodchild in 1897 as The Book of Tephi.

Charles Fox Parham also authored an article tracing Queen Victoria's linage back to King David, and further all the way back to Adam entitled Queen Victoria: Heir to King David's Royal Throne.

British Israelism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Charles Fox Parham

Charles Fox Parham (4 June 1873 - c. 29 January 1929[1]) was an American preacher and evangelist. Together with William J. Seymour, Parham was one of the two central figures in the development and early spread of Pentecostalism. It was Parham that associated glossolalia with the baptism in the Holy Spirit, a theological connection crucial to the emergence of Pentecostalism as a distinct movement.[2] Parham continues to spark controversy, especially regarding his attitudes and beliefs on race.[3]

Charles Fox Parham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edward with Hitler...