# 43 We are saved by grace through faith; repentance and baptism are works of faith (1 Thess. 1: 3) therefore they do not, IMO, conflict with either grace or faith.
We are saved by grace through faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8,9). Repentance actually precedes saving belief/faith. Matthew 21:32 - For John came to you to show you the way of righteousness, and you
did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes did. And even after you saw this, you did not
repent and believe him. Mark 1:15 -
Repent and believe the gospel. Acts 20:21 - testifying both to Jews and to Greeks of
repentance toward God and of faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. So repentance precedes faith and baptism follows faith. A work (done out of faith) is not the same as faith itself so your argument does conflict with saved by grace through faith. Regardless of whether you call baptism a work of faith, baptism is still a work and we are not saved by works, but through faith.
In 1 Thessalonians 1:3, notice the words "work of" faith, "labor of" love and "patience of" hope. These are the practical outworking of the Thessalonians' conversion. The "work" the Thessalonians do is a result or consequence of their faith. So too their "labor" flows from love and their "endurance" comes from hope. Work "of" faith does not mean that faith in essence is the work accomplished. Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Their work is a result or consequence "of" their faith. The work done is "of" faith or done "out of" faith. Faith was already established at conversion and then the work followed as a result or consequence "of" faith. You must not try to turn work "of" faith into this work "is" faith. You must make a distinction between faith and works that follow as a result of our faith, otherwise you have salvation by works.
Both Jesus and Peter said that baptism saves. (Mark 16; 15, 16; 1 Peter 3: 21)
Jesus said he who believes and is baptized will be saved
(general cases without making a qualification for the unusual case of someone who believes but is not baptized) but he who
does not believe will be condemned. *That does not mean that it's baptism that does the saving or that whoever is not baptized will be condemned. The omission of baptized with "does not believe" shows that Jesus does not make baptism absolutely essential to salvation. Condemnation rests on unbelief, not on a lack of baptism. So salvation rests on belief. NOWHERE does the Bible say "baptized or condemned." If water baptism is absolutely required for salvation, then why did Jesus not mention it in the following verses? (3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26). What is the ONE requirement that Jesus mentions 9 different times in each of these complete statements?
BELIEVES. *What happened to baptism? *Hermeneutics. John 3:18 - He who
believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO)
does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO)
because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
In 1 Peter 3:21, Peter said that baptism now saves you, yet when Peter uses this phrase he continues in the same sentence to explain exactly what he means by it. He says that baptism now saves you-
not the removal of dirt from the flesh (that is, not as an outward, physical act which washes dirt from the body--that is not what saves you),
"but an appeal to God for a good conscience" (that is, as an inward, spiritual transaction between God and the individual, a transaction that is symbolized by the outward ceremony of water baptism). We could paraphrase Peter's statement by saying, "Baptism now saves you--
not the outward physical ceremony of baptism but the inward spiritual reality which baptism represents." By saying, "not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience - through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, Peter guards against saving power to the physical ceremony itself. So in 1 Peter 3:21; it's not the water itself that literally saves us, but the "appeal-to-God-for-good-conscience". Just as the eight people in the ark were "saved THROUGH water" as they were IN THE ARK. They were not literally saved "by" the water. Hebrews 11:7 is clear on this point (..built an
ARK for the
SAVING of his household). NOTE: The context reveals that ONLY the righteous (Noah and his family) were DRY and therefore SAFE. In contrast, ONLY THE WICKED IN NOAH'S DAY CAME IN CONTACT WITH THE WATER AND THEY ALL PERISHED.
*See what happens when you only read part of a verse, build doctrine on it and ignore the rest of the verse and the rest of the Bible? You end up with false doctrine.
Paul said that the washing of regeneration saves. (Titus 3: 5)
Paul said
not by works of righteousness which we have done (baptism is a work of righteousness) but through the "washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit" which refers to spiritual washing/purification of the soul, accomplished by the Holy Spirit, not by water baptism.
Perhaps it is time for you to reexamine your theology of salvation.
You are the master of irony.
We become that new creature by the doing of God (1 Cor. 1: 30), when we by faith obey Jesus.
John 6:40 - For my Father’s
will is that everyone who
looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. There is a difference between the obedient act of choosing to place our faith in Jesus for salvation and becoming saved and obey Jesus "out of" faith afterwards. We are saved through faith in Jesus and not by obedient acts/works which follow after we have been saved through faith. You are still teaching salvation by works.
At that time we are sprinkled with the blood of Christ. (1 Peter 1: 2) As our bodies are washed with pure water, our conscience is sprinkled clean by the blood of Christ. (Heb. 10; 22; 9: 14)
Hebrews 10:22 in the NASB reads - let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. *Notice the order. Reference to this verse as proving regeneration, or the new birth, by water baptism ignores the point of the contrasting of that sprinkling which affects the heart, removing from it an evil conscience, and that washing of the body with pure water. It is the sprinkling (with the Blood of Christ- Hebrews 9:14; I Peter 1:2) which touches the heart. The washing of pure water affects the body. Paul was careful to distinguish between an outward holiness or circumcision, which was of the flesh (Romans 2:28-29) and an inward holiness, which was of the heart. The true Jew, the true child of Abraham (and therefore the true Christian) has the inward circumcision of the heart, not only the outward, and this is accomplished by the "sprinkling of the blood of Christ" (I Peter 1:2), not by a washing in water in the ordinance of water baptism. Even Peter said - "not the removal of the dirt from the flesh" but the answer of a good conscience toward God. Through the resurrection of Jesus Christ (1 Peter 3:21). The writer of Hebrews shows us that no outward ceremony affects the heart (Hebrews 9:13). He would not, and does not contradict himself here by teaching that the washing of the body in water accomplishes an inward cleansing. The former is inward and spiritual, "of the heart" (Romans 2:28-29), and the latter is outward and physical, or "of the flesh" (Romans 2:28-29). The washing of the body in pure water does not present baptism as the means of the cleansing or purifying of the heart. The sprinkling with the Blood of Christ is, and washing our bodies with water is expressly distinguished from sprinkling with the Blood of Christ. Since water baptism is not the means of purifying the heart from sin, it is not the means of regeneration, and it is not absolutely necessary for salvation.
Yes, among other things, baptism, is symbolic of the washing with the blood of Christ.
Amen! Baptism is SYMBOLIC of the washing with the blood of Christ. A symbol is not the reality, but the picture of the reality.
Repentance and baptism work with our faith to perfect or complete our faith. (James 2: 22)
James did not say that "repentance and baptism" work with our faith to perfect or complete our faith. James is discussing Abraham here and notice in James 2:21 that James did not say that Abraham's work of offering up Isaac resulted in God's accounting Abraham as righteous. No! The accounting of Abraham's faith as righteousness was made in Genesis 15:6,
many years before his work of offering up Isaac recorded in Genesis 22. The work of Abraham did not have some kind of intrinsic merit to save his soul, but it
proved or manifested the genuineness of his faith. This is the sense in which Abraham was justified by works-shown to be righteous.
Made perfect or complete by works means bring to maturity, carry to the end, to complete like love in 1 John 4:18. It doesn't mean that Abraham was finally saved many years later based on his works. When Abraham performed the good work in Genesis 22; he
fulfilled the expectations created by the pronouncement of his faith in Genesis 15:6.
The scripture was fulfilled in vindicating or demonstrating that Abraham believed God and was accounted as righteous. Abraham was accounted as righteous
because of his faith (Genesis 15:6)
long before he offered up Isaac on the altar and fulfilled the expectations created by the pronouncement of his faith in Genesis 15:6.
Our faith becomes efficacious when it is perfected by the obedience of faith. (Rom. 1; 5) God bless.
We are saved the moment that we place our faith in Christ for salvation before we accomplish any works. According to your logic, Abraham was still a lost man when he believed God and it was accounted to him for righteousness in Genesis 15:6 and was not actually saved until many years later, after he offered up Isaac on the altar and his faith was said to be perfected. Salvation is not by works and faith perfected by works does not mean saved by works and the obedience of faith is not salvation by obedience that follows faith. You are so confused! In regards to Romans 1:5, although Paul can speak of people’s initial response of coming to faith in Christ as an act of obedience, in which he describes it as “obeying the gospel” (Romans 10:16), the purpose of Paul’s apostleship was not merely to bring people to conversion but also to bring about transformed lives that were consistently obedient to God. Notice that Paul said they HAVE (already) received grace and apostleship FOR or UNTO obedience to the faith. Just as in Ephesians 2:10, Paul said that we are created in Christ Jesus FOR or UNTO good works. We are clearly saved FOR good works, NOT by good works (Ephesians 2:8-10). In Romans 1:5, Paul did not say that they did not receive grace and apostleship until they produced “enough” obedience. We have access by FAITH into GRACE… (Romans 5:2) not faith “and obedience.” We are saved through faith first, then “unto” obedience/works.
*You need to REPENT and BELIEVE the gospel and stop teaching salvation by works which is NO SALVATION AT ALL!