I answer questions. (Seeker of truth.)

No. I've only read a lot and I've drawn conclusions. Nothing more. I do not even see the future, I do not intend to do it. I only see a lot of ignorance in today's Christian and I would like to contribute something.

Lo siento mucho pero nadie puede salvar su mismo la biblia está muy claro en eso. Además no hay dos tiempos solo uno y ese tiempo es ahorita no después de la tribulación. Dígame una cosa porque quieres hacer una comparación con la Biblia y el Corán los dos son completamente diferente. El autor de la Biblia es Dios y el autor de el Coran es hombre.

No disrespect or anything intended, but just stating the facts of scripture.

As I pointed out, even though all of the disciples fled, the scripture states that Peter followed the Lord and the group that had arrested him at a distance. There is nothing in the context that would indicate that the one who slipped away leaving his linen garment behind is the same linen cloth lying in the empty tomb. In fact, it was Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus who wrapped Jesus in those linen strips:

"Afterward, Joseph of Arimathea, who was a disciple of Jesus (but secretly for fear of the Jews), asked Pilate to let him remove the body of Jesus. Pilate gave him permission, so he came and removed His body. Nicodemus, who had previously come to Jesus at night, also brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about seventy-five pounds. So they took the body of Jesus and wrapped it in linen cloths with the spices, according to the Jewish burial custom.

In addition, there is nothing in the scripture that would identify the young man as being Joseph of Arimathea either. That he slipped away out of his linen cloth and that Jesus was wrapped in a linen cloth, does not support Joseph as being the young man.

So the linen clothes that laid in the tomb were those that Joseph and Nicodemus wrapped Jesus in, which He discarded after He resurrected.

I studied symbology with a theologian of quite a reputation. The serpent, the dragon are Satan. The Arabic is the language of the snake you just have to see its form of writing. The great tribulation is a moment in which (Imam Mahdi) will rise as world leader. Those who do not accept their mark on their hand or forehead will be martyred. The great tribulation is a world ruled by Islam whose leader will order to kill all who are contrary to this, I mean all other religions. The abducted Christians are not supposed to be there at that moment, but many Christians who were deceived by the false prophet will not be kidnapped. If they overcome martyrdom they will be saved as the apocalypse exposes. To say that I make comparisons between the bible and the Quram as you explain is not true. I repeat that the Christian must know his enemy and Islam is the main one. In fact, I give you a piece of information.

3 Then another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on its heads. 4 Its tail swept to third of the stars out of the sky and flung them to the earth.

The 10 horns represent just the Islamic monarchies in the world today, just check. The 7 crowns are the kings of the Vatican before the beast. From the pacts of Letran, the Pope is no longer only the vicar of Christ, he also acts as king of the Vatican.

I think you want to use "taken" or "raptured" instead of "abducted" and "kidnapped".

I also think that Islam will play some part in Christian tribulation. And already is.

The metaphors of the New Testament are believers are the Bride and are individually adopted sons so we are full sons yet and the Bride is not married yet. There are weeds growing among the wheat in the church which will be sorted out when Jesus returns.

Pope Emeritus Benedict is alive. According to the prophecies of a medieval priest Malachy, Peterus Romanus will become pope after Benedict.

I like numerology. The math surrounding Revelation 2:10.
10 days in prison compared to the crown of life is like the length of the great tribulation compared to the 1000 years of King Jesus' reign on earth.
There are 3 lengths of time given for the great tribulation (1260 days, 3.5 years, 42 months).
Solve for the crown of life using each of the 3 lengths of time.
Each answer has 6 digits that repeats.
You will see the numbers but the units of time don't carry through for the crown of life using the 42 months.
Then use the crown of life for 3.5 years divided by the (3) number pairs for the 42 months.
Divided by 23 gives 66 digits that repeat with 888 (the gematria for Jesus' name in Greek) in the middle.
A string in this answer is 02484472049 which I interpret as Jesus was cutoff (Daniel 9:26) after 24840 weeks (7 days per weeks, not the 69 weeks (periods of 7 years) of the King James Bible).
Jesus was born in year 447 of the 483. He was cutoff in the year 483 of Daniel 9.
After 2000 years, the final seven years to complete the 490 years of Daniel 9:24.
Divided by 80 may give the age that Jesus died (this may be prophesied in Joshua 7:3-5 where about 36 are killed)
Divided by 95 is the Methuselah equation with the age Methuselah became a father and the age that he died in the middle of the answer.
He died the year in the Flood started.
The last digit becomes the first in the repeat. (The last becomes the first is a parable that Jesus told.)
Jesus started his ministry at about age 30. Joseph and King David came to power at age 30.
The first digits of the Methuselah equation are 0030 which become 2030 in the repeat when the last digit becomes the first in the repeat.

You have some good ideas indeed, but no the linen cloth was not the linen cloth left from the young man who fled when Jesus was taken in the garden. the linen cloth in the tomb was a clue only, a symbolic one you could say of something else. He left the garment as a visual reminder of that something else, Peter did flee for a short time though he did return to follow behind. I could tell you but that wouldn't be proper.

You can not lose your salvation because you have not yet obtained it. There has been no person saved at least in this age. To obtain his salvation, he must repent when the Roman Church is born at the hand of Petrus Romanus. This will happen within really little, taking into account that we are at the end of the prophecies and the current pope should be Petrus Romanus, which is not, because Pope Francis is the false prophet of Revelation 13. It is no coincidence that he was elected , on 13 3 2013. In fact if you add 1 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 3 = 13. It's not chance, it's numerology. All this apart from his plan to destroy Christianity by promoting ecumenism and many other heresies in its encyclicals.

The rapture will be according to my knowledge 2045. Why? Because the technological Singularity is a really dramatic event. It will be really complicated to live in that world being a human without AI coupled. It can be something before, not later. I do not know the day nor the time, but the year is not so complicated knowing what is coming.
After this, the tribulation will begin immediately. The true Christianity will be considered sect, the true Christians will be persecuted in the name of peace, love and anyone knows the lies that they invented. The tribulation lasts 7 years, of which 3.5 are of peace. If it is reported about Imam Mahdi, it is precisely the years that he reigned, 7.

See post #3

John nor Peter is the young man I speak of

See post #3

What is your pretension with this post?

Like many on this forum, you only offer your opinion that can not be supported by Scripture.
Everything you have posted is nothing but foolishness and shows just how ignorant you are of the Bible.
But, you are not alone.

if i upload myself and make three copies, which one is me?

Exactly. I use the translator to express myself better so I feel the errors. I hope that at least it is understood.

Hey LPT!

I went out just for the heck of it to see what gotquestions.com had to say about it, which I've posted below. I didn't even consider their possible response. But like they stated, we just can't know who it was for sure:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Question: "Who was the young man who fled naked in Mark 14:51-52?"

Answer: This event occurred in the Garden of Gethsemane the night Jesus was betrayed and captured. Mark 14:51–52 describes a young man who, wearing only a linen cloth, followed Jesus. When he was seized by the Roman soldiers, he escaped capture and ran, leaving the garment behind. The identity of the man is unknown, but since the Gospel of Mark is the only gospel that mentions the incident, many Bible scholars speculate that the young man was John Mark himself, the author of the Gospel of Mark.

It is impossible to know for sure who the young man was, since the Bible does not specifically identify him. There are all sorts of explanations and supposed hidden spiritual/allegorical meanings on the young man who fled naked. None of them have any explicit biblical support. But we understand that the identity of the young man who fled naked must have had meaning to the original readers of the Gospel of Mark. The identity that makes the most sense, with that in mind, is John Mark.

Blessing to you!