so its not really something in the bible it has to do with these barna.com research people?
i reposted the link because i saw a couple of you questioning the methods ((or questioning statistical survey analysis in general)) -- well, the research group of course disclosed their methods. y'all just need to click the link and read it to find the answer to many of these questions, and to have an actual basis of knowledge to argue from, if you want to criticize the study. which is fine, to criticize the study - of course it should be critically analyzed; any statistician would totally agree with that in principle. what any statistician would disagree with, tho, is criticizing a study without knowing any of the details of it. by all means, look critically at the assumptions they made to do the study. but it's silly to just say 'well their assumptions are wrong and this is all meaningless' if you don't actually have any idea what the assumptions actually are.
here's a quote from the link:
For several years, The Barna Group has been tracking how many people possess a “biblical worldview.” The organization defines such a life perspective on the basis of several questions about religious beliefs. The definition requires someone to believe that absolute moral truth exists; that the source of moral truth is the Bible; that the Bible is accurate in all of the principles it teaches; that eternal spiritual salvation cannot be earned; that Jesus lived a sinless life on earth; that every person has a responsibility to share their religious beliefs with others; that Satan is a living force, not just a symbol of evil; and that God is the all-knowing, all-powerful maker of the universe who still rules that creation today.
so, they are concluding that a person does not have a worldview that aligns with the Bible if the person does not believe the things described above.
now that you know what they were thinking and what they base their 'Biblical worldview' conclusion on, what do you think?
is it from the Bible, or is it totally human-origin ideas?
i'm just providing y'all with a more legitimate basis for criticism - so we're not just pooh-poohing in ignorance. i'm not defending the study or attacking it, i'm just laying out facts as well as i can find them.
- 2
- 1
- Show all