I override Constantine!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 19, 2015
134
9
18
#41
Can you explain what you mean by modern day versions? Like any examples? For instance I use the niv version but I also sometimes switch to the king james versions because it has a different kind of taste to it to it to me but both versions have filled my soul with him and both versions I have witnessed the power a single verse can have
May I offer that Dave Flang on YouTube; and Jack McElroy on FB, gets into that best?
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,424
113
#42
GenJesus
Can you explain to me; Lev 23:11-21? The Adventist consensus says; "Yes; to "Sunday".
Leviticus 23 has nothing to do with the Sabbath, it is explaining the first fruits requirement.

Because God created everything, we are to know that everything belongs to God and we are provided for through Him. We are to give back to Him the best and first of all we are given. This is a lasting ordinance, to be applied all through time. Lev. 23: 14 You must not eat any bread, or roasted or new grain, until the very day you bring this offering to your God. This is to be a lasting ordinance for the generations to come.

We are told in 1 Corinthians 25:20 that Christ is the first fruits of those who have eternal life. 1 Corinthians 15: 20 But Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who have fallen asleep.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,214
2,550
113
#43
May I offer that Dave Flang on YouTube; and Jack McElroy on FB, gets into that best?
I want to discuss this with you not them it seems really like you are wanting to promote rather than actually discuss so again I ask what do you mean by modern versions and can you give an example?
 
Dec 19, 2015
134
9
18
#44
GenJesus
Leviticus 23 has nothing to do with the Sabbath, it is explaining the first fruits requirement.

Because God created everything, we are to know that everything belongs to God and we are provided for through Him. We are to give back to Him the best and first of all we are given. This is a lasting ordinance, to be applied all through time. Lev. 23: 14 You must not eat any bread, or roasted or new grain, until the very day you bring this offering to your God. This is to be a lasting ordinance for the generations to come.

We are told in 1 Corinthians 25:20 that Christ is the first fruits of those who have eternal life. 1 Corinthians 15: 20 But Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who have fallen asleep.
"On the morrow after the SABBATH" seems to be a Sabbath statement. Lev 23:11
 
Dec 19, 2015
134
9
18
#45
I want to discuss this with you not them it seems really like you are wanting to promote rather than actually discuss so again I ask what do you mean by modern versions and can you give an example?
I mentioned them; because they do get into it best. And another big problem is; if I talk to somebody who uses a modern day bible; and I mention about "Counterfeits", that they might not accept the possibility of; I can try to tell a little bit; yet there's the possibility that nothing I say will convince that person of what I conclude. The smallest example would be; John 20:26 in KJ reads; "And after eight days." Is it the NIV that reads; "A week later"? There's a reason for KJ to read; "And after eight days."
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,214
2,550
113
#46
I mentioned them; because they do get into it best. And another big problem is; if I talk to somebody who uses a modern day bible; and I mention about "Counterfeits", that they might not accept the possibility of; I can try to tell a little bit; yet there's the possibility that nothing I say will convince that person of what I conclude. The smallest example would be; John 20:26 in KJ reads; "And after eight days." Is it the NIV that reads; "A week later"? There's a reason for KJ to read; "And after eight days."
That possibility is the reality in every discussion I have had more than my fair share of these situations no matter how much evidence is presented to them but we also cannot simply assume everyone is like that otherwise there is no point in debating. I do see your correct in that both versions say different things the question here is which one is correct? was it suppose to say eight days or a week? Honestly i cant believe i missed that good job seeing it
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,214
2,550
113
#47
I have to be going for tonight but you certainly have given me something to ponder, now I am curious what other context is different between the two versions
 
K

KnowMe

Guest
#48
She introduced me to Seventh day Adventism. They presumed to lie to me about "Sunday" in scripture. And because they lied to me; I eventually found out about Lev 23:11-21; that they didn't at 1st; account for, with me; at all.
Huh what did they say the rest day in lev 23 was on Sunday?
 
K

KnowMe

Guest
#49
I just read it, seems like a precursor to the resurrection.
 
K

KnowMe

Guest
#50
Lev 23
The Feast of Firstfruits

9And the LORD said to Moses, 10“Speak to the Israelites and say, ‘When you enter the land I am giving you and reap its harvest, you are to bring to the priest the sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest. 11And he shall wave the sheaf before the LORD so that it may be accepted of your behalf; the priest is to wave it on the day after the Sabbath.
 
K

KnowMe

Guest
#51
Sabbath Laws
(Leviticus 25:1-7; Deuteronomy 15:1-6)

10For six years you are to sow your land and gather its produce,
11but in the seventh year you must let it rest and lie fallow, so that the poor among your people may eat of the field, and the wild animals may consume what they leave. Do the same with your vineyard and olive grove.

12For six days you are to do your work, but on the seventh day you must cease, so that your ox and your donkey may rest, and the son of your maidservant may be refreshed, as well as the foreign resident.

Hmm seems yea the humanbody does need refreshing, from time to time.
 
Dec 19, 2015
134
9
18
#52
Huh what did they say the rest day in lev 23 was on Sunday?
The usual argument from such people is; that's 1 Sunday; out of an entire year of Sabbaths. Meaning; Lev 23; says a yearly "Sunday"; not a weekly. My question remains; is "Sunday" there; AT ALL? Yes it is. Which means; both "Sunday" and Sabbath; share equal holiness at 1st.
 
Dec 19, 2015
134
9
18
#53
Sabbath Laws
(Leviticus 25:1-7; Deuteronomy 15:1-6)

10For six years you are to sow your land and gather its produce,
11but in the seventh year you must let it rest and lie fallow, so that the poor among your people may eat of the field, and the wild animals may consume what they leave. Do the same with your vineyard and olive grove.

12For six days you are to do your work, but on the seventh day you must cease, so that your ox and your donkey may rest, and the son of your maidservant may be refreshed, as well as the foreign resident.

Hmm seems yea the humanbody does need refreshing, from time to time.
You DO realize; Im asking if Lev 23:11-21; means "Sunday"? Im not denying what your revealing; Im now asking; why are you revealing this?
 

Deade

Called of God
Dec 17, 2017
16,724
10,530
113
77
Vinita, Oklahoma, USA
yeshuaofisrael.org
#54
You DO realize; Im asking if Lev 23:11-21; means "Sunday"? Im not denying what your revealing; Im now asking; why are you revealing this?
Keep any day you like for a Sabbath. The Lord will sort it out when He comes back. If you want to study the wave sheaf, realize it pictures Christ's first ascension not His resurrection. And no, you are not going to convince anybody Constantine didn't have his way with Christendom. :cool:
 
O

obedienttogod

Guest
#56
And no, you are not going to convince anybody Constantine didn't have his way with Christendom. :cool:


Hmmm, I did not know people still needed to be convinced of the obvious. And to further that assessment, to also convince them that King James did not force his own personal views towards it. It would be an amazing read and more of a combination of Books had there been an unbiased process involved.
 
P

pottersclay

Guest
#57
But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him. God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.”

Which word translates to Saturday or Sunday my resources are limited..:unsure::unsure::unsure:
 
K

KnowMe

Guest
#58
You DO realize; Im asking if Lev 23:11-21; means "Sunday"? Im not denying what your revealing; Im now asking; why are you revealing this?
In lev 23 is the 7th day sabbath which is equal to the Gregorian calendar day of Saturday, in the NT Jesus is the Sabbath rest in him, rest on Wednesday or Friday, your heart and mind will tell you when you need rest. you can fellowship seven days of week if you like.
 

Hevosmies

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2018
3,612
2,632
113
#59
The real question is was constantine saved or not? WHO KNOWS!

But he did end much of the persecution to Christians so there is no denying he did SOME GOOD.

Perhaps much like Oliver Cromwell, he gets villanized for his mistakes? Did he CONQUER with the cross as he saw? YES. But hey, Christianity wouldnt of spread to Latin America for example, if it wasnt for that laying the foundation.

I live in the FAR NORTH and we would still be 100% pagan tree worshipers if it wasnt for the horrific crusaders and then later on the lutheran preachers!


CALL ME CRAZY, but I say thank GOD! Better a bit in the fear of the LORD than NONE!

I believe in PREDESTINATION.
 
K

KnowMe

Guest
#60
The real question is was constantine saved or not? WHO KNOWS!

But he did end much of the persecution to Christians so there is no denying he did SOME GOOD.

Perhaps much like Oliver Cromwell, he gets villanized for his mistakes? Did he CONQUER with the cross as he saw? YES. But hey, Christianity wouldnt of spread to Latin America for example, if it wasnt for that laying the foundation.

I live in the FAR NORTH and we would still be 100% pagan tree worshipers if it wasnt for the horrific crusaders and then later on the lutheran preachers!


CALL ME CRAZY, but I say thank GOD! Better a bit in the fear of the LORD than NONE!

I believe in PREDESTINATION.
Yea ending the crucifixing of people was a good thing,

a summary

In antiquity crucifixion was considered one of the most brutal and shameful modes of death. Probably originating with the Assyrians and Babylonians, it was used systematically by the Persians in the 6th century BC. Alexander the Great brought it from there to the eastern Mediterranean countries in the 4th century BC, and the Phoenicians introduced it to Rome in the 3rd century BC. It was virtually never used in pre-Hellenic Greece. The Romans perfected crucifion for 500 years until it was abolished by Constantine I in the 4th century AD. Crucifixion in Roman times was applied mostly to slaves, disgraced soldiers, Christians and foreigners--only very rarely to Roman citizens. Death, usually after 6 hours--4 days, was due to multifactorial pathology: after-effects of compulsory scourging and maiming, haemorrhage and dehydration causing hypovolaemic shock and pain, but the most important factor was progressive asphyxia caused by impairment of respiratory movement. Resultant anoxaemia exaggerated hypovolaemic shock. Death was probably commonly precipitated by cardiac arrest, caused by vasovagal reflexes, initiated inter alia by severe anoxaemia, severe pain, body blows and breaking of the large bones. The attending Roman guards could only leave the site after the victim had died, and were known to precipitate death by means of deliberate fracturing of the tibia and/or fibula, spear stab wounds into the heart, sharp blows to the front of the chest, or a smoking fire built at the foot of the cross to asphyxiate the victim.