Amillennialists...Here's a chance to state your case.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

cobalt1959

Active member
Feb 10, 2019
253
124
43
64
This is ridiculous to say the least.
No it is not. God is outside time. He is in control of it and he does not measure it according man's definition of it. People who want to jack around with prophecy and re-mold it to their own personal doctrine do so because they are impatient, or they have a personal agenda they need served. In the case of Preterism and Amillennialism, the entire goal is to make the Church replace Israel. At no point in prophecy does that ever happen. Replacement Theology is 100% bogus.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Start listening to people in here. What they believe and how they believe, Believe it or not. DC and I do not agree with everything concerning end times. But we are able to communicate and see each others side because we are open.

Hal Lindsay is one person. I would suggest most people here do not even agree with him. If we try to listen to others and try to make their belief fit with what some person said that we disagree with, We stop being able to communicate. Or learn.
Thank you for the advice
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
No it is not. God is outside time. He is in control of it and he does not measure it according man's definition of it. People who want to jack around with prophecy and re-mold it to their own personal doctrine do so because they are impatient, or they have a personal agenda they need served. In the case of Preterism and Amillennialism, the entire goal is to make the Church replace Israel. At no point in prophecy does that ever happen. Replacement Theology is 100% bogus.
Interesting, since it is not replacement theology.
Always with the labels.
 

cobalt1959

Active member
Feb 10, 2019
253
124
43
64
Yes, it's quite obvious in certain responses here.
If one is not passionate about what they believe, in regards to Christ, there is a huge problem somewhere. Prophecy is not something someone can play fast and loose with, in regards to Jesus, the Church, Israel's final redemption, any of it. And just as with the basics of salvation, if your basic understanding of Eschatology is wrong, it messes up every other part of your theology and doctrine. You can wave your hand at that, but that hardly changes the reality of it. I've adjusted a few small components of my end times beliefs, but they haven't changed very much since high school. And further study of the Bible and prophecy just confirms further what I already believe. If you bleieved one way for years and then suddenly thought you were wrong, and turned around 180%, there might be a problem. How do you know, for certain that what you believe now is correct? Because biblically, not according to anyone's personal opinion, it is not. There is no way it can be. That is why you meet resistance not with actual discussion, or applicable scripture, you respond with ad hominems and puffed-up opinions as toy why you are right. Someone confident in their beliefs would not resort to those two tactics as an affirmation they are correct. If your biblical premise were correct, you wouldn't need those tactics.
 

cobalt1959

Active member
Feb 10, 2019
253
124
43
64
Interesting, since it is not replacement theology.
Always with the labels.

Of course it is. Most of the people in this thread who are trying to make all prophecy already fulfilled are saying the Church replaces Israel and that Israel's time is done. That's Replacement Theology. It isn't a label. It's what their doctrine does. it's what their doctrine teaches. Do you believe otherwise? Replacement Theology is so odious and wrong, as well as spiritually damaging, that I can't even explain it fully here. It is a huge mistake that people make at their peril. When you try to rob Christ, and Israel of their allotted inheritance, you do so at a great risk to yourself. People don't take this issue nearly seriously enough.

"I can mess around with eschatology. If I'm wrong, no harm, no foul."

No, no you cannot. You can't skate on bad eschatology theology anymore than you can skate on bad salvation theology.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Of course it is. Most of the people in this thread who are trying to make all prophecy already fulfilled are saying the Church replaces Israel and that Israel's time is done. That's Replacement Theology. It isn't a label. It's what their doctrine does. it's what their doctrine teaches. Do you believe otherwise? Replacement Theology is so odious and wrong, as well as spiritually damaging, that I can't even explain it fully here. It is a huge mistake that people make at their peril. When you try to rob Christ, and Israel of their allotted inheritance, you do so at a great risk to yourself. People don't take this issue nearly seriously enough.

"I can mess around with eschatology. If I'm wrong, no harm, no foul."

No, no you cannot. You can't skate on bad eschatology theology anymore than you can skate on bad salvation theology.
Really what will happen if I have wrong eschatology will I burn in hell?
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Of course it is. Most of the people in this thread who are trying to make all prophecy already fulfilled are saying the Church replaces Israel and that Israel's time is done. That's Replacement Theology. It isn't a label. It's what their doctrine does. it's what their doctrine teaches. Do you believe otherwise? Replacement Theology is so odious and wrong, as well as spiritually damaging, that I can't even explain it fully here. It is a huge mistake that people make at their peril. When you try to rob Christ, and Israel of their allotted inheritance, you do so at a great risk to yourself. People don't take this issue nearly seriously enough.

"I can mess around with eschatology. If I'm wrong, no harm, no foul."

No, no you cannot. You can't skate on bad eschatology theology anymore than you can skate on bad salvation theology.
I have read Matthew 24 over several times, I do not see any transition from fulfilled to future fulfillment are you going to shed some light on this?
 

cobalt1959

Active member
Feb 10, 2019
253
124
43
64
Really what will happen if I have wrong eschatology will I burn in hell?
I don't remember saying that, and it is a poor tactic to attempt to infer that I did, as well as disingenuous.

If you get your theology wrong, especially if you use it to lead others astray, you will have to give an account before Christ, just like anything else you have done wrong. I've already got enough to account for now. I am not going to add bad doctrine to the list. Especially not bad doctrine that takes Jesus' inheritance away from Him. What do you think He will have to say about that?

Anyone who points to an author, or Christian speaker as to where they formed their doctrine should pause and wonder why they would be deriving their doctrine from a person, and not the only authoritative source, which is the Bible. Hal Lindsey, Milton Terry, et al. I read one of Hal Lindsey's books. Interesting, but not authoritative. I read a couple of Grant Jeffery's books as well but when he resorted to setting dates, well, that discredits him right away. I don't form my doctrine according to what a speaker or author says, and they cannot be used as a proof of anything. If you don't have your eschatology right, you won't understand what is happening in the world, in real time, and you will not be prepared for what happens in the future.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
I don't remember saying that, and it is a poor tactic to attempt to infer that I did, as well as disingenuous.

If you get your theology wrong, especially if you use it to lead others astray, you will have to give an account before Christ, just like anything else you have done wrong. I've already got enough to account for now. I am not going to add bad doctrine to the list. Especially not bad doctrine that takes Jesus' inheritance away from Him. What do you think He will have to say about that?

Anyone who points to an author, or Christian speaker as to where they formed their doctrine should pause and wonder why they would be deriving their doctrine from a person, and not the only authoritative source, which is the Bible. Hal Lindsey, Milton Terry, et al. I read one of Hal Lindsey's books. Interesting, but not authoritative. I read a couple of Grant Jeffery's books as well but when he resorted to setting dates, well, that discredits him right away. I don't form my doctrine according to what a speaker or author says, and they cannot be used as a proof of anything. If you don't have your eschatology right, you won't understand what is happening in the world, in real time, and you will not be prepared for what happens in the future.
Okay, thank you
 

cobalt1959

Active member
Feb 10, 2019
253
124
43
64
I have read Matthew 24 over several times, I do not see any transition from fulfilled to future fulfillment are you going to shed some light on this?
So I can get more of this?

Really what will happen if I have wrong eschatology will I burn in hell?
No thanks. I'll pass. If you want to stay where you are at, no one is going to talk you out of it.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
So I can get more of this?



No thanks. I'll pass. If you want to stay where you are at, no one is going to talk you out of it.

I am sure you cannot be talked out of your position either....but thank you for your feedback.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
See thats where your wrong

We do see what you said, We just can not see it as you see it. As we have already explained and pointed out to you.

Does that mean your mind is already made up? (See here you go again with your faulty reasoning with an argument which can be used against you as well and does NOTHING to add to the conversation, just puffs yourself up)

The fact is, You just made a point per say. Your mind is made up. Nothing anyone says will change your view.

So one must ask. WHY ARE YOU HERE? You obviously have NO DESIRE TO DISCUSS

Seeking to change someone's mind is not the point, the point is if we examine scripture which is the correct way to understand interpret what is being stated. I am not interested in changing your mind you are free to believe on this as you are persuaded.

Mr. EG do you think it is possible for Jesus to have returned not as in His final return but a return and not staying?

There have been ancient historians like Josephus who have written about it.

I will need to look up the reference.
 

Journeyman

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2019
2,107
763
113
Peter's wording "IN WHICH" refers to a long spans of time (involving a great many things that will transpire WITHIN that long spans of time).
The "long spans of time" are for this purpose,

account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation 2Pet.3:15

Peter is comparing the heavens and earth being engulfed in fire by the 2nd coming to the days of Noah.

Where is his promised return?....vs.4

And they knew nothing until the flood came and took them all away. It will be the same at the coming of the Son of Man. Mt.24:39

Here's some posts I made which touch on that "time period" [a few different posts gathered here, but see especially at the bottom section about 2Pet3:10-12]:

[quoting from my previous posts]

1 Corinthians 15:23-28 (note especially the bold I'm pointing out) -

23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming. [<---note how far apart, time-wise, these two listed items take place]
Paul's focus isn't the time span. It's that we were made Christ's before he appears. Before we see him as he truly is.

24 Then [G1534 - eita ] cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
He's giving his Kingdom to his Father. His kingdom doesn't include the ungodly. It only consists of those who lived by faith.

25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
Yes, but death for the ungodly wasn't put under his feet by faith in him (like it was for believers), because the ungodly didn't have faith in him. Do you understand? Paul is saying Jesus will put death under his feet for them another way. He destroys them.

27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
Paul isn't comparing Jesus to his Father. He's comparing Adam to Jesus.

28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
Yes, but the context of being "subdued" is with respect to the resurrection (Christ the firstfruits, then his people). Paul is teaching that when the saints are seen glorified, Jesus will also be seen glorified as he truly is and should be, as God.

The word "G1534 - eita - THEN" is a SEQUENCE word "with no time-element attached" to it (unlike another Greek word translated "then" which is "G5119 - tote" like is used in 2Th2:8 and other places). THIS word for "THEN" (G1534) is only with regard to "SEQUENCE"... and if you'll notice the THREE items LISTED here START with Jesus' own Resurrection some 2000 YEARS [+] before the NEXT LISTED item. So it is no problem at all for the THIRD LISTED item to be speaking of something that SEQUENTIALLY takes place 1000 years after the second listed item! (Note: the word "comes [cometh]" is not in the text. The text just reads "THEN [G1534] the end"... and it is NOT "THEN IMMEDIATELY the end," as the Amill-teaching [and others] skews it to mean! ;) )
The end comes when we receive glorified bodies,

then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. 1Cor.15:54

He will swallow up death in victory....And it shall be said in that day, Lo, this is our God
Isa.25:8-9

[and]

The Thessalonians were being [wrongly] convinced that "the Day of the Lord IS PRESENT"... THAT was what was on their distraught minds, that "the Day of the Lord IS PRESENT"

--not that it was "near / approaching," but "IS PRESENT"

--not Jesus Himself, but "the Day of the Lord" (a time period involving JUDGMENTS and VERY NEGATIVE things, just like they were already ENDURING... so this idea that it "IS PRESENT" was PERFECTLY *REASONABLE* to them... they were not dippy people)
Paul is linking Christ's coming and gathering his people with the day of the Lord, but cautions them as Jesus did, so as to avoid false Christ's in the midst of suffering.

--not that His Kingdom had arrived (SOMEwhere... over there, somewhere. No, they well knew of Jesus' teachings on that, Paul wasn't neglecting to tell them such truths)
Well, Christ's kingdom is in our midst. Unbelievers aren't part of it, or do they see it for that matter.

--not that "a singular 24-hr day" had arrived

--and NOT [was on their distraught minds] anything about the "Caught Up/Away" Truth (absolutely no one had disappeared, and they were under NO SUCH DELUSION that that had taken place--the CONTEXT of their "thinking" was what Paul SAID, here, and that was, essentially, "don't let anyone convince you that THE DAY OF THE LORD [an EARTHLY TIME PERIOD involving JUDGMENTS, etc] IS PRESENT.
Well, besides possibly being deceived by false Christ's, they may have confused the persecution by men with the wrath of God. Where Jesus's own sufferings are concerned, the vast majority today certainly have.

[because] ONE THING must happen *FIRST*..." [according to the text here]. This is Paul's corrective to them [and this SEQUENCE is REPEATED 3x in this chpt 2, as well as being the SAME SEQUENCE as was shown in 1Th4-5!] And in verse 15 [at the other end of this entire context] says, basically, "believe what WE taught you INSTEAD!" And Paul had already acknowledged that they understood WHAT "the DOTL" involved and that [they knew perfectly that] it "so cometh as a thief IN THE NIGHT" in his previous letter to them, 5:2-3;

--In 2Th2:3-9a, he is elaborating on this and saying that "the DOTL [time period]" won't be present [to unfold upon the earth] until ONE THING happens *FIRST* ... *AND* the man of sin BE REVEALED [and that happens at the START of the 7-yr trib, in the "whose COMING/ARRIVAL/ADVENT/PRESENCE/parousia" of the man of sin "IN HIS TIME" parallels Daniel 9:27[26]'s "prince THAT SHALL COME"... "for ONE WEEK [7 yrs]" at the BEGINNING of it [2Th2:3-9a has the SAME "BEGINNING, MIDDLE, END" that Dan9:27a/b/c does!], aka the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR; 1Th5:2-3; Matt24:4/Mk13:5 - "G5100 - tis - 'A CERTAIN ONE'," when Jesus will "STAND to JUDGE" at the START of the 7-yrs/70th-Wk when HE HIMSELF [in Heaven] will open the FIRST SEAL [aka the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" unfolding upon the earth)

So "the DOTL [time period]" will be present at the same time that "the man of sin" is present to DO ALL he is slated TO DO (over the course of the ENTIRE 7-yr period: [its ARRIVAL at] its BEGINNING, its MIDDLE, its END... ALL of that).
Again, the portion of the DOTL Paul is referring to is the return of Jesus and gathering us. The text says,

Now regarding the arrival of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to be with him, we ask you, brothers and sisters, not to be easily shaken from your composure or disturbed by any kind of spirit or message or letter allegedly from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord is already here.

He's equating the DOTL with the return of Jesus, like this,

Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. Mt.24:23

Paul didn't want them to be deceived.

[and this correlates precisely with]

"... note additionally the TWO "PUNISH" words (in Isaiah 24:21-22[23]) which are SEPARATED by "and after many days" (meaning, that "punish" not only occurs at His Second Coming to the earth BUT ALSO the later GWTj [the TWO "punish" words in Isa24:21-22(23)]) and correlating [time-wise] with that of Revelation 19:19,21/16:14-16/20:5 at the time (context/setting) of His Second Coming to the earth. Meaning, there is still much "time" that will transpire on the earth following His Second Coming to the earth. And this is what the "IN THAT DAY" of Zechariah 14 shows [the MK time period].
I
answered your Isa.24:21-23 in an earlier post and was ignored. As far as Zech.14, Jesus already came to the Mt. of Olives and turned it into a plain (spiritually speaking) and living waters flow from Jerusalem (spiritually speaking) and we know those who go to war against the Lord are dead on their feet already (spiritually speaking) and we acknowledge we're living in tempoary shelters (spiritually speaking) and those who don't have no rain (spiritually speaking), so the text is the result of Christs 1st coming, not his 2nd.
 

Journeyman

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2019
2,107
763
113
TDW,
I couldn't fit your last paragraph because the post was over 1000 words. If you want to continue the discussion, lets do one passage one verse at a time. No more marathons.
 

tanakh

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2015
4,635
1,040
113
76
No it is not. God is outside time. He is in control of it and he does not measure it according man's definition of it. People who want to jack around with prophecy and re-mold it to their own personal doctrine do so because they are impatient, or they have a personal agenda they need served. In the case of Preterism and Amillennialism, the entire goal is to make the Church replace Israel. At no point in prophecy does that ever happen. Replacement Theology is 100% bogus.
This is nonsense. The Church does not replace Israel in either of these positions. It is an extension of Israel. The only thing replaced is
the Old Covenant system. Christ himself replaced that not Preterists or Amillennialists. The Church was headed by Jews who were part of Israel. Try reading all of Paul's teachings on the subject for a clearer view.
 

Journeyman

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2019
2,107
763
113
You are implying that after a person accepts Christ and is saved, God will somehow punish them if their bad. Untrue. You may live an eternity bereft or rewards, but you are still going to be with the Lord.
If you look carefully, Paul says the person himself is tried by fire. There will be professed unbelievers and others who said they believed but didnt standi g before Jesus.

The Great White Throne is something completely seperate and it's extremely clear from the text. it's not a difficult concept.
It's not a difficult concept. It says "whoever's name wasn't found there", which means others were listed there. It's a judgment of saved and unsaved.

Jesus said,

And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come. Mt.24:14

So before Jesus comes, everyone has heard the truth. Paul says the beast comes

with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 2Thes.2:10

People receive Christ or follow the beast. There's no one left on earth getting saved after Jesus returns.
 

yellowcanary

Junior Member
May 22, 2018
122
78
28
If you get your theology wrong, especially if you use it to lead others astray, you will have to give an account before Christ, just like anything else you have done wrong. I've already got enough to account for now. I am not going to add bad doctrine to the list. Especially not bad doctrine that takes Jesus' inheritance away from Him. What do you think He will have to say about that?
Jesus will answer to this in the same manner that He answered Pilate ... "My kingdom is not of this world". Some future prophecies remain obscure, to be sure, but other things Christ has said are definitive. The above is one example of that.

If Christ's kingdom included a literal 1,000 year (post rapture) millennial reign on this earth, why would Jesus clearly state otherwise ?

Christ's church, His bride, has always been comprised of those who believe, be they Jew or Gentile ... and believers only. The mystery of His gospel declared that Gentiles too are now included in God's offer of grace granted thru faith in Christ. Today we know that there is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, neither male nor female in God's kingdom.

Christ's church today (body of believers) is an extension of what His church has always been ... and does not represent a replacement of "Christians for Jews." All are one, if they are believers. This "replacement theology" nonsense spouted continuously by dispensationalists today fails to take into account that Christ's kingdom indeed is not of this world ... and never has been. We who believe look for that heavenly city whose builder and architect is God ... just as Abraham did.

While the bible chronicles the history of earthly Israel, it is primarily God's Word pertaining to spiritual Israel ... His church. Those not understanding the difference between the two will never understand what God has spoken to us thru His Word.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
Why did you skip vs 3?

Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near.

Rev 20 is not a parable. It is a prophesy concerning what will happen in the end.

Making it a parable is to allow a translation which is not according to what John said it was. Prophesy of things which will happen.

Parables are written or spoken to explain a spiritual truth

Prophesy is written to give the people who experience what is spoken proof that God is who he says he is, and this proof causes many to turn repent and turn to God. it also gives many people ( in this instance) hope that God is not gonna just sit by idle and let evil continue, that there will come a time when he will say emenough is enough, and pour out his wrath, and bring an end to what we have been witnessing for thousands of years now.
Hi thanks, with all due respect it would seem you are saying parables are not one of the many manners of prophecy and as a exclusive manner that is set aside purposely hiding the spiritual unseen meaning so that God can teach us how to walk by faith the unseen eternal. I believe the latter. To teach us as our daily bread how to walk by the unseen eternal, the goal of the gospel.... the walk by faith.

The Bible is not only historallly true, written by a witness who was there watching to see his will unfold .But he speaks in a un-familiar signified language. He used Manna, a word that literally means “What is it” as the sweet bread tasting honey . The bread of unfamiliarly. It represents his living word drawing us closer.. again to help understand how we can hear Him by faith.

A good example of uses parable as prophecy as a teaching tool is in the Luke 9:40-55 . This where Jesus is teaching the apostles "how to walk by faith" being unfamiliar. .Jesus spoke parable (3) he hid the meaning in a hope they would look inside for the help of the Holy Spirit But rather they as men looked at the things seen . Three times with three being in the end of the mater he repeated the same message (walk by the manner of faith believe God not seen ). Every time the spiritual meaning was hid it was like Jesus was moved to bottom of the totem pole of "Who is the Greatest" alfa male .

In the end Jesus simply told them as a object lesson .You known not what manner of spirit you are of. The lame that were leaning how to walk by faith.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
No it is not. God is outside time. He is in control of it and he does not measure it according man's definition of it. People who want to jack around with prophecy and re-mold it to their own personal doctrine do so because they are impatient, or they have a personal agenda they need served. In the case of Preterism and Amillennialism, the entire goal is to make the Church replace Israel. At no point in prophecy does that ever happen. Replacement Theology is 100% bogus.
Interesting since Preterism and Amillennialism predate dispenstionalism and futurist theology.
(prior to 1850ish most all bible teachers were not of the dispensational view)

If one follows the process of the dispensational theology it becomes evident that it was necessary for the acceptance and support of the modern state of Israel