He's a "leaky dispensationalist".
I don't agree with his dispensationalism. As I read his study notes, I ignore the remarks coming from that presupposition.
Just because he's wrong on one topic doesn't mean he's wrong on everything.
I don't agree with his dispensationalism. As I read his study notes, I ignore the remarks coming from that presupposition.
Just because he's wrong on one topic doesn't mean he's wrong on everything.
One time he is in a documentary singing the praises of Chuck Smith and the Calvary Chapel movement, next he is excoriating the same in a Strange Fire Conference.