Are the Ends always justified by the Means?

What do you mean by that? Did you define it for me?

It is according to what you been by literal word. If you mean by the txt alone then I will say yes to a degree. Because even though the literal text is absolute truth some verses takes studying to put more meat on the truth. A deeper understanding of the truth. Same truth but deeper understanding.

Which part of the Bible isnt true or which part do you need more faith to believe?

Not sure how what I said relates to your comment. Maybe explain this comment above in more detail.

How is speaking on Hell judging if the Word of God speaks on Hell?

I'm curious. Tell me which scripture should we hide from unbelievers? Both taught by Jesus.

This one

Matthew 13:47-50
47 “Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was let down into the lake and caught all kinds of fish. 48 When it was full, the fishermen pulled it up on the shore. Then they sat down and collected the good fish in baskets, but threw the bad away. 49 This is how it will be at the end of the age. The angels will come and separate the wicked from the righteous 50 and throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

Or this one.

Matthew 22:37
37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.

Define Judging as in what do you consider judging?

The truth is I don't know. And neither do you.

Sorry Roughsoul, yes my answer was a bit brief.
You say that not lying is an absolute. You plucked a couple of verses from Proverbs wrenched from its context to prove your point. In your point about lying to protect the jews from nazis, I said it is virtuous to lie. Love demands it. If you believe it is a wicked sin then presumably the one who does lie in this situation risks hell. That's why I said it was rediculous. If you admit that lying in this situation is the proper course of action, then the rule not to lie is not absolute.

In the verse from Matthew Jesus never specified the length of time people would be in hell. In other verses the greek word describing the length of time in hell is " aionian" . Mistranslated as "everlasting" it is a word that has a definite duration, and end point. Best translated as " age long". Eternal, never ending torment is a false teaching. God's punishments are purifying and reformative. For the first 500 years of christianity universal restoration was the predominant view.

This on the details on translation where as I was debating on the very truth that Hell exists.

I used one verse. Now I will use two.

Proverbs 6:16-19 New International Version (NIV)
16 There are six things the Lord hates,
seven that are detestable to him:
17 haughty eyes,
a lying tongue,
hands that shed innocent blood,
18 a heart that devises wicked schemes,
feet that are quick to rush into evil,
19 a false witness who pours out lies
and a person who stirs up conflict in the community.

All sins lead to Hell without the payment for those sins. God is quite clear on lying. You will have to find where God says lying is okay. Only 2 times I can find where someone lied that resulted in good results and either one God didn't praise or hate the action. So the gray area stands.

I would assume though God also looks at the heart and the intentions of someone's lie. If they lied to save the Jews that is between them and God. Because otherwise that is a gray area, a rare area that isn't spoke on. And I'm sure God would guide the individual in Spirit to do his will.

Then if there is a gray area it is not black and white. Thus not absolute.
Interesting too that Proverbs 6: 17 says, the Lord hates " hands that shed innocent blood"......back to the promised land murders we go. Babes and children are innocent.....are they not?

I agree. There are probably hellish realms.

Nope lying is absolute the area I was talking about is how God judges the liars heart. Gods judgment is what we cannot know.

Who says mankind is innocent? Plus like It says God hates the hands that shed innocent blood. Are any of us innocent in the eyes of God?

Not so. You are here quoting Proverbs, which states what the Lord hates. That's a judgement. But then you say we cannot know what his judgements are.

Your next statement is all over the place. If none of us are innocent in his eyes then why would he hate the shedding of innocent blood? Since, in your view, no one is innocent. So you can excuse the killing of women and children since they are not innocent?

Judgement of the heart. That is what I cannot see or know. I do not know the persons heart or intentions by outward appearance. Only God can see that. Only God can judge what we cant see.

You are failing to understand God and man. You are putting God equal with man. We all have the disease of sin casted on mankind ever since the fall through Adam and Eve. When God takes life it isnt murder or the same if man takes life.

Explain from God's perspective this verse.

Romans 3:10 New International Version (NIV)
10 As it is written:

“There is no one righteous, not even one

Your only option because you do not like the words written in the OT is to say it isnt true. But you must provide a different alternative to show why isn't it true? And then if it isnt true then what is true.

The rules are not absolute then, since the motivation of the heart is primary. And only God can judge.
I,m not saying the verses you quoted are not true, but you point to a verse saying what God hates (which is a judgment), and try and make an a absolute rule about lying from it. You then say it isn't absolute because God only judges the heart. ( which I agree with).

I would need to see the context of the Romans verse. But if what you say is true, then who is the innocent blood that God hates being spilled from Proverbs? Actually, I think it is you that is confusing God and man. It is men that slaughter the innocents in the promised land....not God. Either God hates the spilling of innocent blood ( which you say doesn't exist) or he does not. Which is it?