When are we saved ?

I’m early into the video, about 20 minutes in, and already hears a critical mistake. He said Calvinists teach that God arbitrarily chose people.

Calvinists DO NOT believe in arbitrary election. And Arminians CERTAINLY DONT believe in arbitrary election.

How many strikes should I allow? Continuing the video now.

Absolutely correct. Welcome to the boards!

Correction. 1 Peter 1:1-2

Elect or chosen according to foreknowledge is not Calvinistic, it’s Petrine. You two might want to get your facts straight before you label someone

And it wasn’t me who said two spirits of God.

I’m early into the video, about 20 minutes in, and already hears a critical mistake. He said Calvinists teach that God arbitrarily chose people.

Calvinists DO NOT believe in arbitrary election. And Arminians CERTAINLY DONT believe in arbitrary election.

How many strikes should I allow? Continuing the video now.

I’m early into the video, about 20 minutes in, and already hears a critical mistake. He said Calvinists teach that God arbitrarily chose people.

Calvinists DO NOT believe in arbitrary election. And Arminians CERTAINLY DONT believe in arbitrary election.

How many strikes should I allow? Continuing the video now.

Another proof text...sigh

Foreknowledge is involved, however, it cannot be redefined to mean “foreordination.”

Although what I have noticed it the constant redefining of words by those who follow this Calvinist doctrine of God "foreordaining"

No, I do not define foreknow as foreordain. That’s in your imagination. You never saw me type that.

Even the ' great giant of the faith ' Calvinist ,Jonathan Edwards in his sermon, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," calls UNCONDITIONAL Election ' arbitrary.

You know you are not a straight talker as @lenna has already come to discern as I have as well.

We had a member here @preacher4truth and he was a staunch in holding to the five tenets of this unbiblical dogma... also a fan of R.C. Sproul....

...at least I could respect he was "straight up" in what he believed.

Elect to you means foreordained, chosen... it means selected/chosen by God before the beginning of time.

You know you are not a straight talker as @lenna has already come to discern as I have as well.

We had a member here @preacher4truth and he was a staunch in holding to the five tenets of this unbiblical dogma... also a fan of R.C. Sproul....

...at least I could respect he was "straight up" in what he believed.

Elect to you means foreordained, chosen... it means selected/chosen by God before the beginning of time.

Here’s the problem; you are guilty of countless category errors... and goalpost shifting.

A few minutes ago you argued against foreknowledge being the same as foreordination. Then when I rebutted you, you changed your argument to election is the same as foreordination.

Shifting goalposts from definition of foreknowledge to definition of predestination. Not the same thing.

Either you don’t know the difference between foreknowledge and predestination, or you are trying to make them synonomous in order to dance around the clear teaching of elect according to the foreknowledge of God.

And the next person who insinuates that I am dishonest will be reported. Then the mods can determine if I’m a straight talker or not.

Actually he doesn’t. Read it again. The arbitrary will quote is not about election.

You know you are not a straight talker as @lenna has already come to discern as I have as well.

We had a member here @preacher4truth and he was a staunch in holding to the five tenets of this unbiblical dogma... also a fan of R.C. Sproul....

...at least I could respect he was "straight up" in what he believed.

Elect to you means foreordained, chosen... it means selected/chosen by God before the beginning of time.

So why did you shift the goalposts from trying to say I believe foreknowledge is foreordination to claiming I believe election is foreordaination.

Two very different statements. Stick to one thing at a time and stop bouncing around like a jumping bean

Do you not yet know that election and foreknowledge are NOT THE SAME THING?

How on earth do you go from prognosis to eklego without distinguishing them? You are completely confused in this discussion.

All these words in the Calvinist schema .... predestination, foreknowledge, chosen all add up to the same concept.

I am not stating you are dishonest ...but you redefine what you are stating so it is hard to really converse.

Can you plainly state what "chosen" means.... does God "chose" as in "select" those who are saved before time began?

he obviously does not understand the terms but uses them in a way that suggests he leans towards Calvinism whether or not he understands that. as a result, we have constant denial and constant affirmation from him

for me, I think it is time to just let him do what he seems to do best

say what he does, then deny he said it, insist he is not conforming to reforming, invest in circular reasoning, a few other things and end with an appeal to the authority he recognizes in this thread

it's boring already

I fast forwarded to Ephesians 1:4 because he was going through irrelevant verses,and his explaining away of Ephesians 1:4 was shallow and invalid. He says it is a vocational calling. Sorry, the immediate context is all about salvation!!!!

Made holy- sanctified

Blameless. Justified

Before Him in love. Reconciliation and relationship

Adoption as sons. Entrance into Gods family and future resurrection aspect/ glorification.

Redemption through Christ’s blood.

Forgiveness of sins.

Revelation of the mystery of His Will

Inheritance

Seal of the Spirit

Final redemption of the purchased possession

Ephesians 2 regeneration/ spiritual resurrection

Union with Christ

Saved by Grace

Etc

EVERYTHING relates to salvation. Pauli doesn’t mention vocation until Chapter 2:10, and that in context of the fact that we are His Workmanship, another aspect of salvation.

And the next person who insinuates that I am dishonest will be reported. Then the mods can determine if I’m a straight talker or not.

he obviously does not understand the terms but uses them in a way that suggests he leans towards Calvinism whether or not he understands that. as a result, we have constant denial and constant affirmation from him

for me, I think it is time to just let him do what he seems to do best

say what he does, then deny he said it, insist he is not conforming to reforming, invest in circular reasoning, a few other things and end with an appeal to the authority he recognizes in this thread

it's boring already

All those words are in the Bible. So if you think the Bible is Calvinistic, maybe you should become a Calvinist.

And no, they do not add up to the same concept. Election and chosen are the same. Foreknowledge is different

We are elected ACCORDING TO the foreknowledge of God.

There. That’s my definition of election.

What does foreknow mean? To know a person beforehand.

There. Everything’s defined for you.