Truckers say they're going to take America back on November 29th

It is similar to a cult but neither do I want Biden & Harris in - they're both owned. Anyone who doesn't believe there is a shadow government has not done their homework.

There IS voter fraud: a guy my husband worked with told him he went to vote and his dead father had "voted" before him. How many more dead folks "voted" ?

I expected that there would be civil unrest but after someone told me that truckers are planning on taking the country back on November 29th I was encouraged. There's a lot of voter fraud. But not only that, so much else has gone on that I thought this might be a good thing. Anyone else think so?

I already know responding to this is not going to turn out well but what the heck... here goes.... How will a Truckers strike which would cause hardship for millions of business and people expecting goods result in "taking back America"?
Will only those guilty of voter fraud not get their goods delivered?

It is according to how large of a strike because most goods are brought in by truck. It could literally take the country hostage and desire an immediate response as people will face food scarcity.

This is actually how an ex-navy seal explained how easy it could be to take back the country. Since most liberals live in big cities, it would only take opposition forces to cut off supply to the city. Eventually, it would blow up within and it would be extremely hard for the socialists to organize and calm the violence within.

It is also how they define taking America back. Back from what? If it is a socialist/ Communist takeover then food scarcity would only be a small ill for the dangers to come. Eventually, true socialists will go for American's guns and you will no longer have protests that involve not doing their job like driving trucks. Instead, people will be either going to jail, submitting, fleeing, or dying as they fight back.

The war in Vietnam ended this way. As the US saw the writing on the wall, they began to pull out. The North began to take over the South and eventually cut everything off while closing in on Saigon. The fall of Saigon is the same fate time and time again for a socialist takeover.

One objective of the Communist Party of Vietnam was to reduce the population of Saigon. Following the end of the war, according to official and non-official estimates, between 200,000 and 300,000 South Vietnamese were sent to re-education camps, where many endured torture, starvation, and disease while they were being forced to do hard labor.

If you do not believe the same as them then you must be re-educated or eliminated. This contributed to the

A mass exodus occurred between 1975 and 1995 Indochina refugee crisis. Many fled by boat. The number of boat people leaving Vietnam and arriving safely in another country totaled almost 800,000 between 1975 and 1995. Many of the refugees failed to survive the passage, facing danger from pirates, over-crowded boats, and storms. According to the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, between 200,000 and 400,000 boat people died at sea.

Socialist takeovers have never been good and Americans must ask where in the world could you flee to better than here?

Sounds like an irresponsible way to get their point across. It will create hatred for the truckers and they will get fired and new ones will be hired and if they escalate their anarchy they will get arrested. Nothing more will come of their attempt. The strikers would be replaced. They would find that they aren't all that after all.

America is not so weak that we can't deal with a trucker strike. It has happened before and there was no inner city melt down. Let them strike. It's their right.

Get the book

They've been trying for years - a good read is Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism by Michelle Goldberg - it's an eye opener.

https://www.amazon.com/Kingdom-Coming-Rise-Christian-Nationalism/dp/0393329763

So you fear Christian Nationalism over Socialist/ Communism. Humm tells me a lot about you right there.

In the name of God, Amen. We, whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereigne Lord, King James, by the grace of God, of Great Britaine, France and Ireland king, defender of the faith, etc. having undertaken, for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith, and honour of our king and country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the Northerne parts of Virginia, doe by these presents solemnly and mutually in the presence of God and one of another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civill body politick, for our better ordering and preservation, and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enacte, constitute, and frame such just and equall laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meete and convenient for the generall good of the Colonie unto which we promise all due submission and obedience. In witness whereof we have hereunder subscribed our names at Cape-Codd the 11. of November, in the year of the raigne of our sovereigne lord, King James, of England, France and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fiftie-fourth. Anno Dom. 1620.


Mayflower Compact, the first governing document of America.

Your profile is blocked so I have to ask, are you a born again Christian?

Probably. He cannot even explain the book.

If you read it then share. I do not have time to read such nonsense. I'm well informed on the history of this country and originality. This secular nonsense is not what our founders built. Just read George Washington's farewell address to see how important religion is.

You believe that a person can loose their salvation correct? Some people would use that as a basis to ask the same question.

Ask me if I am saved?! You don't have to, it's on my profile for all to see. I assume yours is also. And no, I don't believe a person can "loose" their salvation. I'm not a Calvinist though. Am I to assume you are?

That document does not remain in force.
Perhaps you should read the Scarlet Letter.

And I see nothing in the N. T. that endorses the implementation of a theocracy. Christianity is not a system of political force.

Nope not a Calvinist

...and people hide their profiles for various reasons, that is why it is an option... it means nothing.

Me neither. Oh, I never said they didn't have the right, I said because they have I have to ask. Many here are not believers at all and they say so on their profile. I'm asking so I know their POV. But if they recommend a book like that, I can't see them claiming to be a Christian. Could be wrong.

Like that makes sense.
As usual people only read, listen to, what confirms what they already believe.

No offense but the same goes for you. Just like the info, I shared about George Washington and Freemasonry. But it still doesn't dilute the responsibility and burden of proof if you make a claim then they should defend it. It is a logical fallacy called Appeal to Authority (argumentum ad verecundiam) logical fallacy and Argument from Authority (argumentum ab auctoritate) are the same forms of discussion arguments in which a person producing a claim referencing the opinion of authority as evidence to support an argument.

Well I read both sides ....and I think one has to employ critical thinking and discern the facts from bias.
That is my personal view.