Who will Win

Perhaps the full context of the paragraph

Deaths A total of six (2 vaccine, 4 placebo) of 43,448 enrolled participants (0.01%) died during the reporting period from April 29, 2020 (first participant, first visit) to November 14, 2020 (cutoff date). Both vaccine recipients were >55 years of age; one experienced a cardiac arrest 62 days after vaccination #2 and died 3 days later, and the other died from arteriosclerosis 3 days after vaccination #1. The placebo recipients died from myocardial infarction (n=1), hemorrhagic stroke (n=1) or unknown causes (n=2); three of the four deaths occurred in the older group (>55 years of age). All deaths represent events that occur in the general population of the age groups where they occurred, at a similar rate.

So statistically the deaths cannot be attributed to the vaccine but they cannot be ruled out either.

This document makes the study transparent so perhaps you can dispense with your conspiratorial view.

LIES LIES LIES... PENNSYLVANIA WAS NOT REJECTED at Supreme Court

You can get in line ..

well, for whatever reason whenever I click on 11th's remark to reply it tells me "requested post could not be found"........
so I wonder, was it posted and deleted right away and I just happened to see a glimps of it?

I'll sum it up:

EleventhHour: I wish FrankChatter were here to post this.......
followed by a picture of an award trophy with a lama head coming out of it and the caption "Most Outstanding Drama Lama Award"

and my reply to that was going to be:

QUOTE: EleventhHour: I wish FrankChatter were here to post this....... end Quote

GG: for all we know he's there looking over your shoulder doing so.........

hmmm, still says post could not be found.... oh how I wish I had caught it a half second sooner.

No worries, all good things come in time.

Yup. If merely a fraction of the chatter that I am hearing is true this vaccine is nothing that I'm going to touch. My mother did not raise me to be a guinea pig.

What actually happened, as you can see here, was that the application for injunctive relief was denied– a far cry from the false claims that the case itself was entirely thrown out. As a matter of fact, you can find here that the case is still on the Supreme Court’s docket.
No, The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case Was Not Thrown Out

I had me do some checking but yes you are absolutely correct!

they'll be wanting the military to overthrow the SCOTUS i imagine.

all the while telling themselves they're not being fascist.

Yep, I'm no lawyer, but just heard and saw this update on NewsMax and confirmed... If you go to the link provided for the Docket and look to the last four entries... Confirms that the application injunctive relief was denied (as I posted); however if you look at the last two entries on the Docket you will see that the case remains active to be briefed... Click on the Main Document links to see the actual case documents that were NOT DENIED...

Dec 08 2020Application (20A98) referred to the Court.
Dec 08 2020Application (20A98) denied by the Court.
Dec 08 2020for Leave to File an Amicus Brief of Lehigh Valley Tea Party submitted. Main Document Proof of Service
Dec 08 2020Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae of Constitutional Attorneys submitted. Main Document OtherProof of Service

"MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICI CURIAE Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37.2(b), the constitutional attorneys (hereinafter “Constitutional Attorneys”) listed below respectfully move for leave to file the accompanying brief as amici curiae. Counsel for the Petitioners has consented to the filing of this motion. Counsel for the Respondents has not yet responded to our request for consent..."

Correct me if I am wrong - but I am inclined to trust the Docket Source (even though I don't speak lawyer speak) along with the Newsmax reporting - which pretty much reported the same...

if you look at a lot of chatter online , the cult of trump wants him to declare martial law.

all the people who were saying they would take up arms and fight in the streets if obama did this are fine as long as trump does it.

that is why i left the cult of trump.

if you look at a lot of chatter online , the cult of trump wants him to declare martial law.

all the people who were saying they would take up arms and fight in the streets if obama did this are fine as long as trump does it.

that is why i left the cult of trump.

if you look at a lot of chatter online , the cult of trump wants him to declare martial law.

all the people who were saying they would take up arms and fight in the streets if obama did this are fine as long as trump does it.

that is why i left the cult of trump.

if there was dissenting opinion in rejecting the application on behalf of the Trump campaign to overthrow the will of the PA voters, the SCOTUS didn't mention it.

if you look at a lot of chatter online , the cult of trump wants him to declare martial law.

all the people who were saying they would take up arms and fight in the streets if obama did this are fine as long as trump does it.

that is why i left the cult of trump.

You voted for Hillary who you kidding, just like Eleventh and Postman