Who will Win

let me dumb it down for you @cv5

φ is irrational
2φ is irrational
3φ is irrational
4φ is irrational
.
.
.
nφ is irrational for any integer n



one of φ's infinite series representations when truncated poorly approximates φ
one of 2φ's infinite series representations when truncated poorly approximates 2φ
one of 3φ's infinite series representations when truncated poorly approximates 3φ
one of 4φ's infinite series representations when truncated poorly approximates 4φ
.
.
.
one of nφ's infinite series representations when truncated poorly approximates nφ, for any integer n


which member of this infinite set each with equally poor truncated infinite series representation approximations is "most irrational" ??
define 'most irrational' please.

That's a quote from the Supreme Court of the United States website

Over your head I guess

It appears the court is looking for a case withing the States Jurisdiction, Voting Resident, Business,Etc

Texas has no interest in another States election process?

There are many cases pending, we will see how things go, this was a big shock.

Will the US Supreme Court deny future cases pending, such as LinWood's on the docket to be heard?

Will the Republican controlled Legislature's in these States, allow the fraudulent electors to move forward?

Will the US Senate and House have at least one objection to the electors to start debate?

Will The Senate Approve The Electors After Debate?

Texas Tribune:
Quote Article: In a few brief sentences, the high court said it would not consider the case for procedural reasons, because Texas lacked standing to bring it.
"Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections," the court wrote in an unsigned ruling Friday evening.

That’s not the case as of today based on a conservative body count of the members of the SCOTUS. Thing is that the SCOTUS has no soft spot for conspiracy theories.

Just woke up from a 4 year nap did you?

Well they are running with one now. Watch and learn.

Out of arguments already?

The ruling had nothing to do with conspiracy, it was ruled that Texas had no jurisdiction in another States election process, State Vs State

You saying he’s the @realDonadTrump?😁

I know what you are doing

And just how will the state of Texas proceed from that?

I so get this ...

Right. and yet we have one of the major disseminators of misinformation saying they said the case had no merit

only a disciple of him, i'm afraid. real Don is too busy with important government matters to be tweeting nonsense, KGB propaganda & disinformation in the middle of the night or spending half his days out golfing, and he gets his information from better sources than conspiracy theorists & hack news outlets..

.. wait ..

Wrong, the ruling was State Vs State not Federal, as seen below in bold red.

Texas Tribune:
Quote Article: In a few brief sentences, the high court said it would not consider the case for procedural reasons, because Texas lacked standing to bring it.
"Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections," the court wrote in an unsigned ruling Friday evening.

The facts are not convenient for her 'facts'

The Texas suit is done, no further recourse

There are several other cases heading to the Supreme Court,one is on the docket LinWood has a case, Sydney Powell Has Cases, many others not named have cases

Wait, wait, wait...the great state of Texas is deliberately, or in fact
premeditated, filling a lawsuit to undermine the constitutional rights of another American state? What happened to states rights, don’t thread on me and don’t mess with Texas?

The Texas suit is done, no further recourse

There are several other cases heading to the Supreme Court,one is on the docket LinWood has a case, Sydney Powell Has Cases, many others not named have cases