ALERT: THE VACCINE MIGHT BE THE MARK OF THE BEAST

No, we are still in primitive vaccine cards we are supposed to keep in a file and remember where it is when we need it mode. There must be a better way.

So that explains the writer of Simpsons foreknowledge.

When you look into the drugs that were funneled into this country, it's sickening to learn the truth. A former DEA agent even wrote a book about it. The widespread suffering and death that ensued was horrific.

The Deagal website has many of us not here by 2025 - so how is that going to happen? The vaccine...or something else?

Planned Parenthood has done their job - all using our own tax dollars which is unconscionable. I just spoke with a scientist who is afraid of the "forever drugs" that people take, urinate out, and it goes right back into our drinking water. Supposedly they aren't filtered out through normal methods. They had an incidence in streams that I read about where male fish developed ovaries and eggs. They suspected it was due to the hormone pills women were taking.

I wouldn't doubt that the vaccine contained sterilization - as you say, death is their business.

I've read on a number of website comments that people said they'd better not try to force vaccinate or it would come down to using lethal force.

They think the public is stupid. Now Pence & wife are shown getting the vaccine to prove it's safe. I read that people pointed out there was a sleight of hand trick used by the doctor.

That's what they did to the doctors who said that Nagalese was in all vaccines. They were found murdered. But too many doctors and scientists are speaking out about this current vaccine and they can't kill them all.

Remember this: there are many other doctors and scientists who do not go on air who are against the vaccine.

Of course they did. Did you hear about the report that the Doctors hand had a tear on his skin and you could clearly see a Lizard hide underneath it? People need to wake up. This is Nephilim juice they are injecting.

I haven't seen it but I think the consensus is that there is something in there that is not healthy.

The fact that it has aborted babies in it should wave a large red flag before believers. I read an article yesterday that said that God would never approve of people having babies killed so they can get a vaccine. He said he'll die before taking it.

I have read the reports and tried to read the studies (I can't understand much of them) and I do trust the data that the CDC has made available on all of these studies to see if their is any link to Autism and vaccines and everything says that there has been no link established by any of the many studies.

Those that present data to prove autism is linked to vaccines never present actual scientific data that comes anywhere close to what I find cited on the CDC site. I believe that they are so overwhelmingly doing a better job of presenting the science studies on this that the others side is just subjective opinions and that have long since been debunked. However they hold on to them as almost a religious belief system without a shred of credible science linking autism to vaccines.

At this point I no longer consider the autism link a valid position. I've moved on. If you don't believe that you can get credible information from the links on the CDC website on this issue of Autism and Vaccines then you are missing out on an excellent place to find the most important studies that have been performed. If you don't want to be convinced that their is NO link I would not suggest that you read them because they will change your mind and cause you to abandon the autism vaccine link and you seem a little too personally invested to be comfortable with that idea.

I think we have to be careful making judgments about other people and what their relationship with God is. We don't know what happened to the woman after injected. We don't know what was in the vaccine to make her feel out of it - or using the words that she described. I have learned that some people just don't communicate feelings well; they are not articulate. Her particular choice of words seemed unusual but we just don't know what it was that made her feel "off." I just don't want to discount her feelings or invalidate her. Something made her feel different. It could have been the changing of her DNA that elicited some feelings within her. I agree that "feelings" aren't the determiner of God, but I sense God; at times very strongly.

God is not a trickster but we were forewarned who is. That being said, the jury is still out about where this all factors in regarding the end times. I'm no theologian but others who have studied Scripture far more than me are concerned. The patent 060606 and name "Luciferase" are particularly troubling.

I think that we adequately covered the warning to young believers that this is all just speculation; it's just a discussion. If someone feels they want to share something we should not shame them. None of us can claim superior spirituality over another, although that habit seems rife among believers - and I don't excuse myself from it - some of the best pastors fall prey; after all, pride was what made Lucifer fall and he held a place of quite importance at one time. Let's remember that Christ chose simple fishermen to be His apostles.

Same here.

ALL TRUTH PASSES THROUGH THREE STAGES; FIRST, IT IS RIDICULED, SECOND, IT IS VIOLENTLY OPPOSED, THIRD, IT IS ACCEPTED AS BEING SELF-EVIDENT. (Arthur Schopenhauer)

We don't write it off. It is just that credible science can be observed and reproduced in such a way that papers can be published that will be analyzed and reproduced by other scientists and a link can be proved.

We withhold judgment on one man's opinion and go with the majority opinion that has current published studies to back them. He has the burden of presenting his theory in scientific manner that can be reviewed and tested by his peers.

We don't have to reject them and we don't have to embrace them. That is not writing them off. Let the science inform us.

The science published for decades is telling me that vaccines are safe. Accusations otherwise must be proved not simply claimed. I look at both sides proof presented an so far the CDC information on the safety of vaccines is far more convincing to me as legitimate science.

Am I making too much sense?

Naw.. she was just bat poo crazy.

I remember when "Mondex" was the mark of the beast.

I’m undergoing surgery in early January. I was very quick to say yes, as I think I can get it done before hospitals and healthcare facilities require proof of injecting the poison vaccine.

I was not shaming anybody. I said that it's possible, she MIGHT have been suggested by her church to be scared. What if her pastor constantly preaches that this vaccine is the mark, and she had to get the vaccine because of her occupation? I did not claim it as a fact did I? I'm speculating as much as you are.

It's less controlled on the search results though. Well, at least from my experience.

Smart move. I hope the surgery is successful for you.

The list of ingredients reads like a scientific experiment. If the ingredients were translated to common English, it would probably be more informative. I was thinking of researching all the "scientific" ingredients, but have better things to do with my time, like eat breakfast or something.

This should be a good read over your breakfast cereal. This is an explanation of those ingredients.

The lipids
The Pfizer vaccine, like one from Moderna, uses lipid nanoparticles to encase the RNA. The nanoparticles are, basically, tiny greasy spheres that protect the mRNA and help it slide inside cells.

These particles are probably around 100 nanometers across. Curiously, that’s about the same size as the coronavirus itself.

Pfizer says it uses four different lipids in a “defined ratio.” The lipid ALC-0315 is the primary ingredient in the formulation. That’s because it’s ionizable—it can be given a positive charge, and since the RNA has a negative one, they stick together. It's also a component that can cause side-effects or allergic reactions. The other lipids, one of which is the familiar molecule cholesterol, are “helpers” that give structural integrity to the nanoparticles or stop them from clumping. During manufacturing, the RNA and the lipids are stirred into a bubbly mix to form what the FDA describes as a “white to off-white” frozen liquid.

Salts
The Pfizer vaccine contains four salts, one of which is ordinary table salt. Together, these salts are better known as phosphate-buffered saline, or PBS, a very common ingredient that keeps the pH, or acidity, of the vaccine close to that of a person’s body. You’ll understand how important that is if you’ve ever squeezed lemon juice on a cut. Substances with the wrong acidity can injure cells or get quickly degraded.

Sugar
The vaccine includes plain old sugar, also called sucrose. It’s acting here as a cryoprotectant to safeguard the nanoparticles when they’re frozen and stop them from sticking together.

Saline solution
Before injection, the vaccine is mixed with water containing sodium chloride, or ordinary salt, just as many intravenously delivered drugs are. Again, the idea is that the injection should more or less match the salt content of the blood.

No preservatives
Pfizer makes a point of saying its mixture of lipid nanoparticles and mRNA is “preservative-free.” That’s because a preservative that’s been used in other vaccines, thimerosal (which contains mercury and is there to kill any bacteria that might contaminate a vial), has been at the center of worries around over whether vaccines cause autism. The US Centers for Disease Control says thimerosal is safe; despite that, its use is being phased out. There is no thimerosal—or any other preservative—in the Pfizer vaccine. No microchips, either.

I find it interesting how faithfully you trust the CDC. They have been known to make mistakes or, in the case below, out-right mix results of two different tests to create inaccurate results in our current pandemic:
https://www.npr.org/sections/corona...a-could-create-misleading-picture-of-pandemic

I also tend to side eye an organization whose members (ACIP) own more than 50 patents related to vaccines. I don't trust that they can be unbiased when it comes to vaccine research when they're lining their pockets with cash.
https://www.lawfirms.com/resources/...rs-own-more-50-patents-connected-vaccinations

When the bigwigs at the CDC are making money from vaccinations and then turn around and fund the studies for autism and, lo and behold, CDC has proven autism has no link to vaccines! Doesn't that make you skeptical, at least a teeny bit?

"The CDC conducted or paid for nine different studies looking at thimerosal and autism. It found no link."
https://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/do-vaccines-cause-autism

No link, they say. Just keep paying us our moola:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...anglements-the-cdc-guaranteed-vaccine-market/

Those were NOT "mistakes" by the CDC. There was a deliberate, determined, and evil conspiracy to mislead the public (and the world) and create fear, anxiety, and panic, so that a handful of medical hacks could control the world's populations. And it worked.

But before CDC began publishing its bogus numbers, there was already a conspiracy in China, and there were co-conspirators in the WHO, the Imperial College (UK), NIH, NIAID, IHME, etc. to totally mislead and confuse everyone. The FDA and the AMA joined hands with these people to prevent the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) particularly as a combo package which was very cheap and very effective. Had HCQ been freely available to everyone at absolutely no cost, there would have been no need for lockdowns, masks, distancing, and all the other nonsense which accomplished nothing expect to destroy lives, businesses, and economies.

What should be carefully noted is that absolutely no government in the world did anything to seriously investigate this fraudulent *pandemic*, and now no government in the world is warning its citizens to avoid the bogus vaccines (since they are not genuine vaccines but mRNA vaccines, which are a totally different kettle of fish).