"Christians must resist all COVID-19 restrictions. Here’s why"

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 5, 2022
1,224
620
113
36
"A higher plane," hehe
www.youtube.com
My prediction is that the unvaccinated who are so because they do not trust vaccines are going to keep the hospital ICU units busy for the next two years for sure.

There might be a decline but there will be complaints from hospitals telling us that they are treating ICU patients for COVID complications who would not be there if they had been vaccinated.

By about 2024 that number will probably dwindle significantly because many unvaccinated will have gotten infected and gotten over it. I wont call it herd immunity because there will still be lots of unvaccinated who get sick for decades to come.

I don't expect a huge surge in new vaccine patients. I think by now those that have taken a stand against vaccines are not going to give up their reasons and will probably take those reasons to the grave with them. Later generations will still be repeating antivaccine information long since debunked simply because they want to believe it anyway. That's just how people are. I have learned this over the past two years.

The vaccinated will be ok, not getting seriously ill, and might need a booster from time to time depending on variants. like the Flu. But those variants wont be serious for the vaccinated because they won't be sufficiently mutated to bypass ALL immunities from previous vaccines and boosters. So this will make new variants have a hard task to put down a vaccinated patient.

Then I predict that one day a completely new virus other than COVID will come out of the wilderness somewhere that will be a global killer that will be as contagious as COVID and kill people in days. This will turn some countries into post apocalyptic wastelands.

I don't know when that will happen but I think history suggests that it will happen eventually. We are not ready for anything like that.
Boy, you drank the Koolaid and asked for seconds, huh. At this point I'm not even going to compose a rebuttal. We'll see who the healthy survivors are when the dust settles.
 
Oct 29, 2021
217
23
18
PART II
The shots have been proven to cause serious adverse reactions, including death
MRNA shots are considered “vaccines” only because the definition of “vaccine” has changed in recent months to include mRNA injections. First, a little background on the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS): It was established in 1990 to keep track of all vaccine adverse events, and now includes those from the COVID-19 shots. A Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Inc. study indicated that only 1% of all vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS.

According to VAERS, COVID-19 shots from all manufacturers combined have resulted in over 180,000 adverse events, including over 4,000 deaths. [Note: The latest data from VAERS as well as EudraVigilance (Europe) shows at least 17,000 deaths and over 1,000,000 (one million) adverse events. And the rest of the world is not even shown in these numbers]

If, as the Harvard study indicates, this is only 1% of all adverse events and deaths, we’re looking at a horrendous loss of life and health. Even if, due to more awareness about vaccine adverse events, that number is 10%, it still amounts to almost 2 million adverse events and 40,000 deaths. Compare that to the polio vaccine in the 1950s that was pulled after 5 deaths. The flu vaccine in the 1970s that was pulled after 53 deaths. And Tylenol was pulled from shelves after seven deaths.

The “vaccines” have been given FDA approval under Emergency Use Authorization.
This, in itself, is problematic. The law states that EUA can only be allowed if there are no treatments for a given illness. But in the case of COVID-19, there are.

There are effective treatments for COVID-19
[Note: these treatments were deliberately sabotaged by public health authorities]
Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have been demonstrated to be only two of several treatments for COVID-19. They have both been used for decades and are considered extremely safe. They have been used off-label to successfully treat COVID-19, either alone or in combination with other supplements and antibiotics. On top of that, they’re inexpensive.All COVID-19 shots are connected to the abortion industry

By far my biggest reason to refuse these horrid jabs is that they are all connected with the abortion industry. This is indisputably anti-life.

LifeSite’s John-Henry Westen shares some clips of Stanley Plotkin’s 9-hour testimony before the U.S. Senate. Plotkin reluctantly admitted that over 70 babies’ corpses were used in the process of finding the two cell lines that would be used in a number of vaccines. Some people say that since these cell lines, obtained in the 1970s, are so distantly connected to abortion as to be untainted, it’s okay to get the vaccines. But the fact is that new cell lines are being developed all the time, because cell lines die out eventually and there aren’t enough of them for all the research “scientists” want to do.

Pamela Acker is a biologist and researcher who explains the horrors of the abortions done to obtain material for medical research — including researching, testing, and manufacturing vaccines. These innocent children are delivered via Caesarian section. Their tissues are harvested from them while they are still alive and without benefit of anesthesia, since that would damage the usefulness of the tissues. WI-38, MRC-5, HEK-293, PER C-6 are some of the cell lines that are currently used in the manufacture of various vaccines.

The Johnson & Johnson injection contains DNA fragments from aborted babies. The Moderna and Pfizer injections were tested on aborted fetal tissue. They are all created at the expense of an innocent child. I cannot and will not be a party to such barbarism.

Conclusion
In the very beginning of the “COVID crisis,” I kept saying that the numbers didn’t add up. Either things were much worse than we were led to believe, or they weren’t nearly as bad. Lockdowns, followed by mask mandates, followed by talk of vaccine mandates, convinced me that COVID-19 was not as serious as the government pretended, but that the response was going to be much worse. I was proven right. I don’t know why there is so much pressure for everyone to receive the jab: rewards, threats, coercion. Why do all of that if the jab is truly safe and effective? In fact, if it’s effective, then why worry about those who don’t get it?

And I guess that’s my big question. Why? The possible answers scare me, and they should scare every thinking person on the planet.

Lora Young is a mother of three homeschool graduates and grandmother to ten young children (eight of whom are homeschooled now). A passionate pro-life activist and holding the desire to be a true Disciple of Christ, she continues teaching in a myriad of ways. In wrestling with her own decisions regarding the lockdowns, mask mandates, and vaccines, Lora felt the need to write everything down. This is the result of many hours of prayer, reading His Scriptures, and research.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinio...why?utm_source=top_news&utm_campaign=standard
I'm pretty sure you're right about the statement that a cloth mask won't stop a virus. A virus is smaller than a cell, surely it will penetrate a paper or a cloth mask. However, I keep seeing reports online that many people are dying from this in many places, where the virus is concentrated. It raises the same questions that the AIDS virus raised, actually. I mean, every virus is a bloodborne pathogen. But how does the infection spread? You do remember AIDS, right? Back in the 80s? And there were a lot of alternative theories about how that got started, and they were related to people's moral characters.
 
G

Godsgirl83

Guest
self test danger:

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/greg...ounter-covid-test-kits-1_oGWBU5cuQJ1YyeZ.html


https://www.fda.gov/media/147254/download

Scroll down to page 4


18.The Reagent Solution contains a harmful chemical (see table below). If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with copious amounts of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice: https://www.poison.org/co ntact-us or 1-800-222-1222. Chemical Name/Sodium Azide /26628-22-8 /Acute Tox. 2 (Oral), H300 Acute Tox. 1 (Dermal), H310


Sodium Azide is an acute toxin as in very very poisonous.


https://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/sodiumazide/basics/facts.asp


"Sodium azide prevents the cells of the body from using oxygen. When this happens, the cells die."

"Sodium azide is more harmful to the heart and the brain than to other organs, because the heart and the brain use a lot of oxygen. "


"Exposure to a large amount of sodium azide by any route may cause these other health effects as well: Convulsions, Low blood pressure, Loss of consciousness, Lung injury, Respiratory failure leading to death, Slow heart rate"


"Survivors of serious sodium azide poisoning may have heart and brain damage."

"No specific antidote exists for sodium azide poisoning."


And you are instructed by this test to put this poison on a swab and insert it into your nose?? The side affects of being poisoned is very close to the symptoms one would have from getting "Covid19"!




https://tapnewswire.com/2021/12/sod...-in-the-covid-medical-intervention-apparatus/

"Here is the key quote: “The Reagent Solution [included in the test kit] contains a harmful chemical (see table below). If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with copious amounts of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice…”
Then the FDA document lists that harmful chemical: sodium azide.
Just how harmful is it?
For an answer, let’s look at a CDC document titled, “Facts About Sodium Azide.” We find this statement:
“Sodium azide is a rapidly acting, potentially deadly chemical that exists as an odorless white solid.”
Then there is this: “Sodium azide prevents the cells of the body from using oxygen. When this happens, the cells die. Sodium azide is more harmful to the heart and the brain than to other organs, because the heart and the brain use a lot of oxygen.”
Yes, as with all poisons, the degree of damage depends on the dosage, but you decide whether “potentially deadly,” as the CDC describes sodium azide, signifies a significant risk.
If you read the FDA document I referenced above, you’ll see that the reagent containing sodium azide is involved in the self-administered COVID test, and the whole test procedure is complex enough to allow fumbles and mistakes—such as a spill of the “deadly chemical.”
Don’t believe me? Try this FDA quote on for size: “To perform the test, an anterior nasal swab specimen is collected by the patient, then 6 drops of extraction reagent from a dropper bottle are added to the top hole of the swab well. The patient sample is inserted into the test card through the bottom hole of the swab well, and firmly pushed upwards until the swab tip is visible through the top hole. The swab is rotated 3 times clockwise and the card is closed, bringing the extracted sample into contact with the test strip. Test results are interpreted visually at 15 minutes based on the presence or absence of visually detectable pink/purple colored lines.”
See what I mean? Good luck.
Now let’s move on to the second problem with this at-home self-performed COVID test: it’s grossly misleading. The results are ambiguous.
The FDA document I’ve been quoting contains this gem: “The BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test does not differentiate between SARS-CoV and SARS…CoV-2.
BOOM. In other words, a positive test, indicating infection, could mean nothing more than infection with the 2003 “SARS virus”—and that “epidemic” was a dud. But wait, there’s more:
Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”
Double trouble. The person who tests positive could simply be housing bacteria in his body, AND whatever germ the test is detecting may not even be causing disease."
Other than that, the at-home test is perfect."


In other words, this test is unreliable to tell anyone if they have the new coronavirus and it is potentially deadly to even use the test.
That might explain why "they" are so eager to push "4 FREE kits for EVERY home"
 

Amanuensis

Well-known member
Jun 12, 2021
1,457
460
83
Boy, you drank the Koolaid and asked for seconds, huh. At this point I'm not even going to compose a rebuttal. We'll see who the healthy survivors are when the dust settles.
Well, not trying to argue about anything since it was just my own personal prediction. I will check back in 2024 to see if I was close or not.

Also, the Kool Aid reference comes from the Jim Jones event where an extremist charismatic cult leader misused scriptures and preached antigovernment conspiracy theories to fool people and got them to kill themselves with poisoned Kool Aid, so technically "drinking the Kool Aid" would apply more to conspiracy theorists and antivaccine zealots who fool people into not getting vaccinated and then they die of COVID" But you can use it to apply to the majority of sane Christians who are not cult leaders if you want, it just does not really make sense to the sane people you are addressing and makes you look like you don't know how to use a proper metaphor.
 
Jan 5, 2022
1,224
620
113
36
"A higher plane," hehe
www.youtube.com
Well, not trying to argue about anything since it was just my own personal prediction. I will check back in 2024 to see if I was close or not.

Also, the Kool Aid reference comes from the Jim Jones event where an extremist charismatic cult leader misused scriptures and preached antigovernment conspiracy theories to fool people and got them to kill themselves with poisoned Kool Aid, so technically "drinking the Kool Aid" would apply more to conspiracy theorists and antivaccine zealots who fool people into not getting vaccinated and then they die of COVID" But you can use it to apply to the majority of sane Christians who are not cult leaders if you want, it just does not really make sense to the sane people you are addressing and makes you look like you don't know how to use a proper metaphor.
The phrase refers to people being deceived leading to their own destruction.
 
Jan 5, 2022
1,224
620
113
36
"A higher plane," hehe
www.youtube.com
I'm pretty sure you're right about the statement that a cloth mask won't stop a virus. A virus is smaller than a cell, surely it will penetrate a paper or a cloth mask. However, I keep seeing reports online that many people are dying from this in many places, where the virus is concentrated. It raises the same questions that the AIDS virus raised, actually. I mean, every virus is a bloodborne pathogen. But how does the infection spread? You do remember AIDS, right? Back in the 80s? And there were a lot of alternative theories about how that got started, and they were related to people's moral characters.
Correct. Dr. Peter Gottlieb - formerly of the FDA, now working for Pfizer - said just a couple weeks ago that cloth masks do nothing to protect from COVID-19.

But actually, several studies done over a year ago concluded the same thing, their findings were just suppressed by the scientism propaganda machine.

The CDC cannot just admit they were wrong, so their recent updated mask guidance simply says there is a "hierarchy" of protection levels offered by different masks, with N95 masks being the best and cloth masks being the worst.

The reality is that only FITTED N95 or KN95 masks offer any protection at all. These are also single use items. COVID can stay in an airspace for months and contact exposed surfaces, so taking off a mask and reusing it can just get particulates INSIDE the mask, rendering it pointless.

The FITTED masks are required because any air gap between mask and face render the mask ineffectual no matter what kind it is. Children's faces are too small for fitted masks and facial hair negates a fitted mask, so kids really cannot be effectively masked AT ALL, nor can bearded men. Children are at EXTREMELY low risk for COVID anyways with something like a one in two million chance of dying from COVID.

Suicide rates are highly elevated due to COVID. Masks have a notable negative psychological impact on society. Masking keeps bacteria and carbon dioxide close to the face, depriving the brain of oxygen and potentially contributing to skin issues and other health concerns. Masks that are not regularly cleaned are a biological health hazard.

In short, masking is not merely pointless (as we have been doing it anyways) but detrimental. Vaccinating children and masking children is ineffectual or detrimental and a crime against humanity.
 

Amanuensis

Well-known member
Jun 12, 2021
1,457
460
83
The phrase refers to people being deceived leading to their own destruction.
Drinking the Kool Aid came from the Jim Jones, Jonestown event, therefore ... Specifically it would best be applied when applied to lying, conspiracy theory, charismatic religious leaders. That is where it came from.

Therefore if someone believes a video that was crafted by a liar to make it look "official" that the vaccine will change your DNA, and you believe it and don't get vaccinated. You drank the Kool Aid. Especially if you then die from COVID at a later time. Then you really DRANK the Kool Aid just like Jones Town. Same results. Listened to a liar and died.
 

Amanuensis

Well-known member
Jun 12, 2021
1,457
460
83
Drinking the Kool Aid came from the Jim Jones, Jonestown event, therefore ... Specifically it would best be applied when applied to lying, conspiracy theory, charismatic religious leaders. That is where it came from.

Therefore if someone believes a video that was crafted by a liar to make it look "official" that the vaccine will change your DNA, and you believe it and don't get vaccinated. You drank the Kool Aid. Especially if you then die from COVID at a later time. Then you really DRANK the Kool Aid just like Jones Town. Same results. Listened to a liar and died.

I am just saying.. It only really makes sense when we tell antivaxxers who are believing misinformation, that they have drank the Kool Aid. It doesn't work when you apply it to those who follow the science.
 

JTB

Well-known member
Aug 31, 2021
2,076
635
113
I am just saying.. It only really makes sense when we tell antivaxxers who are believing misinformation, that they have drank the Kool Aid. It doesn't work when you apply it to those who follow the science.
Actually, there's too much koolaid of all colors on all sides being drank. If people could just figger out how to draw back from the edges and into the center again... and no, if you see the other side as your 'enemy' you are NOT in the center.
 
S

SophieT

Guest
My prediction is that the unvaccinated who are so because they do not trust vaccines are going to keep the hospital ICU units busy for the next two years for sure.

There might be a decline but there will be complaints from hospitals telling us that they are treating ICU patients for COVID complications who would not be there if they had been vaccinated.

By about 2024 that number will probably dwindle significantly because many unvaccinated will have gotten infected and gotten over it. I wont call it herd immunity because there will still be lots of unvaccinated who get sick for decades to come.

I don't expect a huge surge in new vaccine patients. I think by now those that have taken a stand against vaccines are not going to give up their reasons and will probably take those reasons to the grave with them. Later generations will still be repeating antivaccine information long since debunked simply because they want to believe it anyway. That's just how people are. I have learned this over the past two years.

The vaccinated will be ok, not getting seriously ill, and might need a booster from time to time depending on variants. like the Flu. But those variants wont be serious for the vaccinated because they won't be sufficiently mutated to bypass ALL immunities from previous vaccines and boosters. So this will make new variants have a hard task to put down a vaccinated patient.

Then I predict that one day a completely new virus other than COVID will come out of the wilderness somewhere that will be a global killer that will be as contagious as COVID and kill people in days. This will turn some countries into post apocalyptic wastelands.

I don't know when that will happen but I think history suggests that it will happen eventually. We are not ready for anything like that.

so tiresome

I have had many vaccines growing up and another when I crossed the border to live in the US...married to an American

those who do not care to have this experimental concoction injected into their unsuspecting arm, are not anti-vaccine

we are anti participation in this world wide experiment in accepting a substance that is not FDA approved (not that that is the hallmark of all things safe and to be trusted, but it does at least supposedly allow for proper testing which is a process over years....not months)

ps: I thought this manufactured gain of function was the world wide epidemic? so puzzled now

I predict (and I am no prophet) that your prophecy is one worlder wishful thinking (not saying you are a one worlder, but the aspirations of those who are, are painfully obvious...to some anyway

Later generations will still be repeating antivaccine information long since debunked simply because they want to believe it anyway. That's just how people are. I have learned this over the past two years.
glad you have learned something. I hope you consider this post and perhaps take opportunity to further your education
 
Oct 29, 2021
217
23
18
The vaccination debate seems to contain a lot of political opinion, and very likely misinformation and disinformation on both sides. I tend to think that I don't believe in the masks, just because I do know what a virus is, and I understand the scale of the microbe and I know something about permeability. Also, I think it's odd that everyone is required to go around with covers over their faces. It's like everyone in the supermarket and the bank is dressed like a robber. I wonder if that actually objectively has affected the crime rates?
 

Amanuensis

Well-known member
Jun 12, 2021
1,457
460
83
so tiresome

I have had many vaccines growing up and another when I crossed the border to live in the US...married to an American

those who do not care to have this experimental concoction injected into their unsuspecting arm, are not anti-vaccine

we are anti participation in this world wide experiment in accepting a substance that is not FDA approved (not that that is the hallmark of all things safe and to be trusted, but it does at least supposedly allow for proper testing which is a process over years....not months)

ps: I thought this manufactured gain of function was the world wide epidemic? so puzzled now

I predict (and I am no prophet) that your prophecy is one worlder wishful thinking (not saying you are a one worlder, but the aspirations of those who are, are painfully obvious...to some anyway



glad you have learned something. I hope you consider this post and perhaps take opportunity to further your education
Education. Yes, maybe classes in virology or immunology. That would be very rewarding.
 

Amanuensis

Well-known member
Jun 12, 2021
1,457
460
83
Turns out, he did not invent mRNA vaccines. He is a pioneer of the technology but there are many others involved as I suspected.
And the full story is that he is a jaded researcher who feels cut out of the glory taking and has found another path to the spot light by spreading misinformation. So sad. Someone should get him help.

https://www.theatlantic.com/science...lone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic/619734/
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,479
12,945
113
...and has found another path to the spot light by spreading misinformation.
You are quoting the Atlantic to smear Malone? "Spreading misinformation"???? Do you know anything at all about the lethal and toxic injections which have been mislabeled as "vaccines"? Your comments shows that you have still not woken up to reality.

Here is how the lying media smear good patriotic upstanding citizens in order to promote state-sponsored tyranny.

Canada State Media Suggests Russia is Behind Truckers For Freedom Convoy – Yes, Really – (VIDEO)

If anyone knows the truth about what has happened (and is happening) with the truckers Freedom Convoy in Canada and the huge number of Canadians who have supported the truckers throughout the country, it should be clear that this is just as baseless a LIE as the Russian Collusion lie against Trump which was exposed a long time ago. The mainstream media are not honest journalists but vile propagandists, and the Atlantic is among them.
 
O

Oblio

Guest
Meanwhile, Chinada is ignored!
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
12,954
8,669
113
I am just saying.. It only really makes sense when we tell antivaxxers who are believing misinformation, that they have drank the Kool Aid. It doesn't work when you apply it to those who follow the science.
Are you so insanely prideful that you are incapable of admitting you were wrong, and those raising the warning flag are completely right?

None of this is conjecture. It is information compiled by Department of Defense Drs on the control group called the United States Military.

The death and destruction caused by the lethal injection posing as a vaccine is nothing short of catastrophic:

Whistleblowers share DOD medical data that blows vaccine safety debate wide open:

Data, transparency, and surveillance. That is what has been missing from the greatest experiment on humans of all time throughout this pandemic. Now, military medical whistleblowers have come forward with what they claim is perhaps the most accurate and revealing data set on vaccine safety one could possibly find.

The pro-pharma politicians and media claim the CDC’s pharmacosurveillance tool “VAERS” is not good enough to trigger investigations into the shots because anyone can supposedly submit a vaccine adverse event entry. Thus, all the concerning safety signals from VAERS are being ignored, even though that system was put in place as a consolation to the public for absolving vaccine manufacturers of liability. Well, now some military whistleblowers are coming forward to present data that, if verified, would signal extremely disturbing safety concerns about the vaccine that make the VAERS data look like child’s play.

On Monday, during Sen. Ron Johnson’s five-hour hearing on a “COVID-19: Second Opinion,” Ohio attorney Thomas Renz, who has been representing clients suing the vaccine mandates, presented DOD medical billing data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) that paints a shockingly disturbing picture of the health of our service members in 2021.



According to the military, DMED is the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch’s (AFHSB) “web-based tool to remotely query de-identified active component personnel and medical event data contained within the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS).” In other words, it contains every ICD medical billing code for any medical diagnosis in the military submitted for medical insurance billing during any given period of time. Three military doctors have presented queried data to Renz that shows a shocking and sudden spike in nearly every ICD code for common vaccine injuries in 2021.

In a declaration under penalty of perjury that Renz plans to use in federal court, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long — three military doctors — revealed that there has been a 300% increase in DMED codes registered for miscarriages in the military in 2021 over the five-year average. The five-year average was 1,499 codes for miscarriages per year. During the first 10 months of 2021, it was 4,182. As Renz explained to me in an interview with TheBlaze, these doctors queried the numbers for hundreds of codes from 2016 through 2020 to establish a baseline five-year average. These codes were generally for ailments and injuries that medical literature has established as being potential adverse effects of the vaccines.

Renz told me the numbers tended to be remarkably similar in all those preceding years, including in 2020, which was the first year of the pandemic but before the vaccines were distributed. But then in 2021, the numbers skyrocketed, and the 2021 data doesn’t even include the months of November and December. For example, some public health officials speculate that COVID itself places women at higher risk for miscarriages. But the number of miscarriage codes recorded in 2020 was actually slightly below the five-year average (1,477). However, they were not drastically below the average on any one category in a way that one can suggest it reflects lockdown-related decreases in doctor’s visits, which somehow led to an increase in 2021 diagnoses.

The database has all the ICD codes for both military hospital visits and ambulatory visits. The data presented by Renz so far is all from the query of ambulatory diagnosis data.

Aside from the spike in miscarriage diagnoses (ICD code O03 for spontaneous abortions), there was an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). There was also a 1,000% increase in diagnosis codes for neurological issues, which increased from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000!

Some other numbers he did not mention at the hearing but gave to me in the interview are the following:

  • myocardial infarction –269% increase
  • Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
  • congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
  • female infertility – 471% increase
  • pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase
All these numbers are among the ambulatory visits because those are where the vast number of diagnoses in the military occur. However, Renz did say the increases were indicated in the hospitalized patients as well. I have seen one of the sworn declarations from one of the military doctors, and it states as follows, “It is my professional opinion that the major increases incidences of the above discussed instances of miscarriages, cancers, and disease were due to COVID-19 ‘vaccinations.'"

According to Renz, it was the actual clinical experience of the three named doctors and several unnamed doctors that led them to investigate DMED, and their discoveries reflected their experience treating patients with ailments extremely unusual to healthy, young soldiers since the rollout of the vaccines.

I have spoken to one of the whistleblowers who attests to being gravely concerned with seeing young soldiers with sudden metastatic cancers, auto-immune diseases, and heart and circulatory disorders that have caused many soldiers to drop out of various training programs. “These doctors were motivated to explore DMED data due to the numbers of case increases they were seeing empirically,” said the whistleblower, who served in the military for many years. “Some physicians throughout the force (all branches) have been intimidated by commands not to perform the full spectrum of testing and adhere to the regulations, which implicitly direct full workups for EUA vaccination adverse reactions. It will require other military physicians to step forward and share experiences to fully ascertain the enormity of these allegations and engender an investigation to the fullest extent.”

Renz claims he has a video with two witnesses showing the entire process of downloading this data from the database and is prepared to present it in court. He also told me that this is just “the tip of the iceberg,” as the codes have increased exponentially in numerous other diagnosis categories. Renz said his spreadsheet, which includes over 100 medical diagnosis categories, was shared with Senator Johnson and his staff before the Monday hearing.

It’s important to note that these numbers do not represent the number of individual people diagnosed with various ailments, but number of diagnoses codes used in totality at a given time. For example, someone who has a stroke is obviously going to rack up numerous neurological ICD codes over the course of a year with multiple ambulatory and hospital visits. However, the apples-to-apples comparison from the previous five years clearly shows an unmistakable spike in ailments.

If these numbers are verified in the upcoming court cases, then absent some massive military insurance fraud or bizarre glitch in the system, it potentially paints a shocking picture of vaccine safety concerns that would indicate that not only were the VAERS safety signals something that should immediately have been followed up on, but they are plagued by woeful underreporting. The military is a defined, finite, and closely controlled and monitored population. They are also overwhelmingly young and healthy. If allegations of neurological, cardio, and cancer concerns surrounding the vaccines are indeed true, the military would be the most revealing place to discover it, and their data is the most reliable and undisputable.

DMED is quite literally an epidemiologicalsurveillance program designed for the express purpose of detecting surges in illness and injury to make sure the military is combat-ready. It’s about national security even more than public health. Why would the military not have blown the whistle and warned the CDC right away about this data? On the military health system website, the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division (AFHSD) is described as “the central epidemiologic resource for the U.S. Armed Forces, conducting medical surveillance to protect those who serve our nation in uniform and allies who are critical to our national security interests.”
 

Gardenias

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2020
2,281
1,119
113
U.S.A.
Mark 16:14-19
Tells us about the occurrences after Jesus resurrection and ascension making salvation possible for ALL mankind.

In these verses he gives the great commission, the signs that will follow those that believe and how the believer will be saved and the unbeliever be damned.

He also tells them of the POWER of the Holy Ghost that is to come and indwell in them....going so far as offering divine PROTECTION for followers.
V18 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink ANY deadly thing, it will NOT hurt them;.......

Now he sits at the right hand of the Father making intercession for believers and in part unbelievers through saints prayers!

Whatever is to come upon this earth as wrath for sin against God is HIS plan. satan CAN NOT take us from life only God can. He knows you to the point of even knowing the number of hair you have.

Let us TRUST God knows all,and he it is that orders our footsteps!