Do SDA believe Michael is God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Duckybill

Well-known member
Aug 16, 2021
1,145
221
63
Strong's Greek 3762. oudeis, ... not one, none" categorically excludes, declaring as a fact that no valid example exists; and 3761. oude,... and not, neither" which are used in Acts 4:12, "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved."

And before you answer that Jesus was the name given to Him after He took on flesh, remember that He said, "before Abraham was, I am" and not, "before Abraham was, I was Michael." Why not?
"Before Abraham was, I was Michael" is a Satanic LIE.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
5,948
1,693
113
"Before Abraham was, I was Michael" is a Satanic LIE.
It is especially disturbing because most people approach belief by believing what they want to believe, rather than from the standpoint of not wanting to believe lies. I can't say I'd never considered this idea might be truth but had enough of the latter mindset to search out the matter and, ironically, was led to find a firm conclusion of it by the false claim that
"my name is in him." Fortunately, I know His Name, "I am" from which derivative forms of the hebrew "to be" come, YHVH, which is found no where in any shape, form, or likeness, not one, none, and not, neither, in Mi-cha-el.
 
Feb 7, 2022
646
75
28
He said, "before Abraham was, I am" and not, "before Abraham was, I was Michael." Why not?
Look at the contextual question and argument. It was about His eternal existence (egw eimi), not His office as messenger for the Father, and he came in His Father's name.

If you consider some rabbinical materials there are those that equate the Messiah to Michael.

Adam Clark notes:

"Yet Michael the archangel - Of this personage many things are spoken in the Jewish writings "Rabbi Judah Hakkodesh says: Wherever Michael is said to appear, the glory of the Divine Majesty is always to be understood." Shemoth Rabba, sec. ii., fol. 104, 3. So that it seems as if they considered Michael in some sort as we do the Messiah manifested in the flesh. ... ".

For instance:

"An angel of the LORD appeared." R. Yohanan said: This is Michael. ... Whenever they saw R. Yose the tall, they used to say, There is our holy Rabbi! So too wherever Michael appears, he is the Glory of the Shechinah. ..." - https://www.sefaria.org/Shemot_Rabbah.2?ven=Sefaria_Community_Translation&vhe=Midrash_Rabbah_--_TE&with=Translation Open&lang=bi

Others:

"... Michael as a name of the Messiah. Such was the opinion of the best among the ancient Jews (Wetstein, N.T., note on Jude 9; Surenhusius Bibles Katall., p. 701, etc.) ..."
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
5,948
1,693
113
Look at the contextual question and argument. It was about His eternal existence (egw eimi), not His office as messenger for the Father, and he came in His Father's name.

If you consider some rabbinical materials there are those that equate the Messiah to Michael.

Adam Clark notes:

"Yet Michael the archangel - Of this personage many things are spoken in the Jewish writings "Rabbi Judah Hakkodesh says: Wherever Michael is said to appear, the glory of the Divine Majesty is always to be understood." Shemoth Rabba, sec. ii., fol. 104, 3. So that it seems as if they considered Michael in some sort as we do the Messiah manifested in the flesh. ... ".

For instance:

"An angel of the LORD appeared." R. Yohanan said: This is Michael. ... Whenever they saw R. Yose the tall, they used to say, There is our holy Rabbi! So too wherever Michael appears, he is the Glory of the Shechinah. ..." - https://www.sefaria.org/Shemot_Rabbah.2?ven=Sefaria_Community_Translation&vhe=Midrash_Rabbah_--_TE&with=Translation Open&lang=bi

Others:

"... Michael as a name of the Messiah. Such was the opinion of the best among the ancient Jews (Wetstein, N.T., note on Jude 9; Surenhusius Bibles Katall., p. 701, etc.) ..."
I do understand how some may come to this conclusion. As like among the theological field of Christians, there also are differences in view among rabbinical teachings.
 

kinda

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2013
3,679
1,435
113
Thanks all, I wonder why no SDA is responding?

"Christ and the Archangel Michael
Seventh-day Adventists believe that Michael is another name for the Heavenly Christ, and another name for the Word-of-God (as in John 1) before he became incarnate as Jesus. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven...sts believe that,he became incarnate as Jesus.

I think the SDA Church has many good teachings, but this one I'm skeptical of. Another one is SDA believes that Jesus turned water into grape juice instead of wine, or something like this.

Although, I think SDA Church is wise in encouraging people not to drink, because so many people have problems with alcohol, I don't believe it's accurate to state that Jesus turned water into non-alcoholic grape juice, but that is just my perspective.

SDA Church has a strong health message though, vegetarian/vegan diets, no smoking, exercise, no drinking, resting on the Sabbath, and trusting God. They are also many doctors and medical professionals that attend SDA Churches, so just wanted to be balanced here, since I think the SDA Church has many positive points.

Many people who attend SDA don't believe everything the church teaches. I have been to SDA Bible Studies and some teachers are teaching directly opposite of what the SDA teach. I hope this helps the discussion.

https://ssnet.org/blog/why-did-jesus-create-wine/
 
Feb 7, 2022
646
75
28
YHVH, which is found no where in any shape, form, or likeness, not one, none, and not, neither, in Mi-cha-el.
I think you should reevaluate that position:

JEHOVAH Elohiym is the eternal family/relationship. JEHOVAH is the singular eternal family name, while Elohiym (Gods, trio) are the individual Persons/Beings that exist in that eternal family/relationship, Matt. 28:19; 1 Jhn. 5:7,8.

1. JEHOVAH, "the LORD" (Gen. 19:24b.; Zec. 3:2b.), "the Ancient of days" (Dan. 7:9,13,22) is "the only true God" (Jhn. 17:3; τὸν μόνον ἀληθινὸν θεὸν), "God" (Jhn. 1:1b.; τὸν θεόν), "thy God" (Heb. 1:9; ὁ θεός σου), "God the Father" (2 Jhn. 1:3; θεοῦ πατρός) the "person" (Job 13:8; Heb. 1:3) identified in the beginning as the "God said" (Gen. 1:6), for it was by Him that Revelation says, "Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created." (Rev. 4:11).

2. Jesus JEHOVAH (Gen.49:18; Exo. 14:13; 2 Chr. 20:17; Jon. 2:9; Psa. 119:174 HOT) or JEHOVAH Immanuel (see Psa. 46:7,11 HOT)), "the LORD" (Gen. 19:24a.; Zec. 3:2a.), "the son of man" (Dan. 7:13), "the only begotten" (Jhn. 1:14,18, 3:16,18; Heb. 11:17; 1 Jhn. 4:9, is basically monogene (μονογενῆ; Jhn. 3:16; Heb. 11:17; 1 Jhn. 4:9) or monogenes (μονογενὴς; Jhn. 1:18) or monogenous (μονογενοῦς; Jhn. 1:14, 3:18)), "the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father" (2 Jhn. 1:3; Κυρίου Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ τοῦ υἱοῦ τοῦ πατρός) is not "the only true God" (Jhn. 17:3), but is "the express image of his person" (Heb. 1:3; χαρακτὴρ τῆς ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ), being "the Word was God" (Jhn. 1:1c.; θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος), who is "O God" (Heb. 1:9; ὁ θεός), the "just person" (Matt. 27:24, "person", 2 Cor. 2:10) indentified in the beginning as "God made" (Gen. 1:7) on behalf of the Father's direction (Pro. 8:22-36; Exo. 20:12), for it was by him (the Son) that John says, "All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made." (Jhn. 1:3), that Ephesians says, "And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:" (Eph. 3:9), that Colossians says, "For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:" (Col. 1:16), that Hebrews says, "Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;" (Heb. 1:2), the very, "I AM THAT I AM" (Exo. 3:14), the great "I am" (Jhn. 8:58; ἐγὼ εἰμί), the very "fellow" (Zec. 13:7) of the Father's person, and who comes in the name of His Father (Jhn. 5:43).

3. The Holy Spirit of JEHOVAH (Luk. 4:18), "his Spirit" (Isa. 48:16), "the LORD" (Zec. 3:2c.), the "another Comforter" (Jhn. 14:6), even "he", "the spirit of truth" (Jhn. 14:17, 15:26, 16:13), "God" (Acts 5:4), identified in the beginning as "the Spirit of God moved" (Gen. 1:2) and "God saw" (Gen. 1 throughout, the eternal Witness who inspired the scriptures; 2 Tim. 3:16-17; 2 Pet. 1:21), by which/whom everything is "created" (Psa. 104:30) and "made" (Job 33:4), whose nature is a mystery left unspoken of in scripture, but is the person who does "not speak of himself" (Jhn. 16:13), but comes in the name of the Son (Jhn. 14:26).

The eternal Heavenly Trio - family JEHOVAH Elohiym, over all creation as "Godhead".

If I were to try to present this idea in a limited humanistic fashion, it might go something like this:

Father Jones

Son Jones Jr.

Cousin Jones.

The trio "Jones", or "Jones" family.

Three Persons/Beings working together as united family without dischord, but rather thinking and acting as harmonious chord.

Owning "Jones" Construction, they are all "Boss" (like "God") over their employees.

In fact the Father "Jones" can be "with" Son "Jones" Jr at a construction site, and an employee come up to them two, and say "Boss", and both would respond together, because "Boss" (Son) was with the "Boss" (Father) at that moment, thus in John 1:1 "God" was "with" "God".

Even in maths, this works, because of something called "set theory".

Father, Son and Holy Spirit (Set Deity)

Angels, mankind & lesser creatures (Set creation)

Set Deity is Head over Set creation. Yet Set Deity is not a single Person/Being, but a group, as all individuals together which are creation is not a single person/being but a group.

Yet, in (Set Deity) as (Head) are three Persons/Beings which individually or together are "Head" over creation.

Yet in (Set Deity) there is also heirarchy (Gen. 41:40).

Set Father

Set Son

Set Holy Spirit.

Now for "only true God" and "only begotten":

Mono

Gene

Mono is simply "one", "only".

Mono is used in conjunction or connection, gene.

Gene refers to race or nature (that which makes up the content of essence), that which comes about or exists through/from another.

It's used this way even coming down to our English:

"gene (n.) 1911, from German Gen, coined 1905 by Danish scientist Wilhelm Ludvig Johannsen (1857-1927), from Greek genea "generation, race" (from PIE root *gene- "give birth, beget"). De Vries had earlier called them pangenes. Gene pool is attested from 1946." - https://www.etymonline.com/word/Gene

That is why the Father is called:

monon alethinon theon, ton theon

And because the Son is in the express image of the Father, is called:

monogene, logos en o theos

The Father's nature is His own, underived ("true"*), but the Son, because He is the Son has that same nature because of the Father.

True - https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/true

Authentic - https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/authentic

Original - https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/original

It means underived.

So monogene in connection with monon alethinon theon means that the nature of the Son is of the Father and he is the only Son of the Father with that nature of the Father.

Created Angels and humans are sons, but not of that same nature as the Father and Son are.

In other words:

The Father is "The only true (underived in nature) God"

The Son is "The only begotten (derives His nature from the Father because He is the Son) God"

Remember, "only begotten" has nothing to do with time, or creation, or coming into existence in these contexts, but and only deals with the existing nature of the Son in relation to the Father.

I know what people think when I say that, but they need to understand the definition of what is said by saying it.

Another thing that needs to be discussed that shows the error of the Catholic "trinity" is the following:

The Father is not a perfume, not an aethereal essence pervading the universe. That is pantheism, or panentheism, both of which are gross heresies and destroys the Gospel itself and would even place God in the sinner, including satan himself, which is a violation of Revelation 3:20, etc. God is omnipresent through omniscience (Psalms 139).

Mat_6:9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.

Mat_16:17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

Luk_11:2 And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth.

He, the Father, is a "Person", even His person (Job 13:8; Hebrews 1:3), of which Jesus (the Son) is the "express image" of.

As for the rest, see "His person" (Job 13:8); "form of God" (Philippians 2:6), "shape" (John 5:37), "image" (Genesis 1:26,27; Hebrews 1:3), "likeness" (Genesis 1:26,27), "being" (Acts 17:28), has a very real movable "Throne" on which He sits (Daniel 7:9-10; Revelation 4-5, &c), has "the hair of his head like the pure wool" (Daniel 7:9), "whose garment was white as snow" (Daniel 7:9), has a "right hand" (Revelation 5:1; Acts 7:55-56), able to be looked upon, "to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone" (Revelation 4:2), having His own "nature" (Galatians 4:8).

God has hairs on His head, Daniel 7:9; and has hands, Exodus 33:22; and has feet, Exodus 24:10; and loins [H4975; waist to upper thighs, see 1 Kings 18:46, etc], Ezekiel 1:27; a face, Matthew 18:10; a heart, Genesis 6:6; parts, Exodus 22:32; a form, Philippians 2:6; shape, John 5:37; is a Person, Hebrews 1:3; is a Soul, Jeremiah 5:9; and is a Spirit, thus has a mind, Matthew 12:28.

See also "back parts" (Exodus 33:23), and even a "divine nature" (2 Peter 1:4), see also "under his feet" (Exodus 24:10).

The angels are also called 'spirits' and "persons" ("fellows"; Hebrews 1:9), "young man" (Mark 16:5; Daniel 9:21; &c), and yet have real celestial (Heavenly) "bodies" with unfallen angelic "flesh" (1 Corinthians 15:35-58; Jude 1:7, Genesis 17-19, &c) an unfallen heavenly "nature" (Hebrews 2:16), where as we have bodies terrestrial (dust).

The Son is also a "person" (Hebrews 1:3; 2 Corinthians 2:10; Matthew 27:24; Deuteronomy 27:25; &c).

So is the Holy Ghost (John 14:16; &c)

Mankind are also called 'spirits' (1 Peter 3:19; Hebrews 12:23) and yet are real tangible beings, with bodies (made of dust).

Philippians 2:6; Daniel 3:25; Genesis 18:4, 19:2; Exodus 24:10-11; Psalms 18:9; John 5:37; Exodus 33:23,20,22; Daniel 7:9-10,13; Ezekiel 1:1,8,26-28; Acts 7:55-56; Psalms 24:1-10; John 20:17; 1 Peter 3:22; Matthew 18:10; Revelation 1:13-20, 2:1, 4:1-11, 5:1-14; Hebrews 1:13; Colossians 1:3-6; Numbers 12:8; Isaiah 45:23, 48:3; Revelation 3:16; Psalms 89:34; Psalms 104:33, 146:2; Acts 17:28; Genesis 1:26-27; Colossians 1:15; &c.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,900
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
Yes, it (Lucifer) does mean, in context of Isaiah & Ezekiel, one who bears God's light.

The problem with your "scholar" (Malachi 2:12) is that they are myopic in their blindness of following the ideology of men.

Isa 14:12: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!"

Isaiah 14:12 HOT
איך נפלת משמים הילל בן שחר נגדעת לארץ חולש על גוים׃

Do you see any diacritics? No, because they were all added later.

Isaiah 14:12 HOT translit. ëykh' näfal'Tä miSHämayim hëylël Ben-shächar nig'Da'Tä lääretz chôlësh al-Gôyim

You obviously cannot read Hebrew or English, since the text does not anywhere equate Lucifer to being the morning star.

The text clearly reads, "O Lucifer, son of the morning" (hëylël Ben-shächar) (הילל בן שחר).

The words for "Venus" (נוגה), or even "star" (כוכב) is completely absent. Morning is different from the night stars (Nehemiah 4:21).

Lucifer was not, and never has been "the morning star"; for that is for Michael/Christ/Son of God alone, for it is another way of saying the sun of righteousness (Malachi 4:2; Psalms 19:4-5), the "day dawn ... the day star" (2 Peter 1:19), the light of God (Revelation 21:23; John 1:7, 8:12, 9:5, 12:46, etc).

Lucifer was once a son of God, a child of the light, a reflector of God's glory.

Lucifer (Latin) means "light bearer", and it was not his own light he bore, but merely reflected God's own glory before he trusted that the light he bore came of himself (Ezekiel), and so fell.

Lucifer's brightness was never his own. It was when he began to reason so that he fell. The context of Lucifer's name stems from the brightness he once reflected from God's own glory, hence, "one who bears God's light".

Whether from halal (assumed) being heyel, meaning to shine, or from heyl (strength, force, etc) El (God) both reveal that Lucifer was as covering cherub to God the reflector (once perfect) of God's glory/light, having once been standing in God's presence. What is interesting is that the angel which replaced Lucifer has a similar name "Gabriel" (Gbr El, strength of God or God is strong in him).

In your attempt to derail the topic, and simply bring the conversation to pointless mentions of added diacritics of an unrelated nature, just to be argumentative and petty because you refuse to address my specific questions on the OP, you have made Lucifer the morning star and added to God's word, and subtracted from the context of Isaiah and Ezekiel. Woe unto you scribes.

2Pet 1:19: "We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:"

Hos 6:3: "Then shall we know, if we follow on to know the LORD: his going forth is prepared as the morning; and he shall come unto us as the rain, as the latter and former rain unto the earth."

Rev 22:16: "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright morning star."

Seventh-day Adventists are the new bearers of God's light/glory:

Job 11:17: "And thine age shall be clearer than the noonday; thou shalt shine forth, thou shalt be as the morning."

Song 6:10: "Who is she that looketh forth as the morning, fair as the moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners?"

Isa 58:8: "Then shall thy light break forth as the morning, and thine health shall spring forth speedily: and thy righteousness shall go before thee; the glory of the LORD shall be thy rereward."

Read the context of Isaiah with Ezekiel and put away what you think is true, for God's word which is truth.

Those who speak Hebrew from scripture will acknowledge that what I said is true, but those who get their Hebrew learning from other than the Bible (Psalms 119) will continue in their manmade errors.
Malachi 2
Easy-to-Read Version
Rules for Priests
2 “Priests, this rule is for you. 2 Listen to me! Pay attention to what I say. Show honor to my name. If you don’t respect my name, bad things will happen to you. You will say blessings,[a] but they will become curses. I will make bad things happen because you don’t show respect for my name.” This is what the Lord All-Powerful said.

3 “Look, I will punish your descendants. During the festivals, you priests offer sacrifices to me. You take the dung and inside parts from the dead animals and throw them away. But I will smear the dung on your faces, and you will be thrown away with it! 4 Then you will learn why I am giving you this command. I am telling you these things so that my agreement with Levi will continue.” This is what the Lord All-Powerful said.

5 The Lord said, “I made that agreement with Levi. I promised to give him life and peace—and I gave him those things. Levi respected me and showed honor to my name. 6 He taught the true teachings and didn’t teach lies. Levi was honest, and he loved peace. He followed me and saved many people from being punished for the evil things they did. 7 A priest should know God’s teachings. People should be able to go to a priest and learn God’s teachings. A priest should be the Lord’s messenger to the people.

8 “But you priests stopped following me! You used the teachings to make people do wrong. You ruined the agreement with Levi.” This is what the Lord All-Powerful said. 9 “You don’t live the way I told you. You have not accepted my teachings. So I will cause people to hate you and think you are worth nothing.”

Judah Was Not True to God
10 We all have the same father. The same God made every one of us. So why do people cheat one another? They show that they don’t respect the agreement. They don’t respect the agreement that our ancestors made with God. 11 The people of Judah cheated other people. People in Jerusalem and Israel did terrible things. God loves the Temple, but the people in Judah didn’t respect the Lord’s holy Temple. The people of Judah began to worship a foreign goddess. 12 The Lord will remove them from Judah’s family. They might bring gifts to the Lord All-Powerful—but it will not help. 13 You can cry and cover the Lord’s altar with tears, but the Lord will not accept your gifts. He will not be pleased with the things you bring to him.

14 You ask, “Why are our gifts not accepted?” It is because the Lord saw the evil things you did—he is a witness against you. He saw you cheat on your wife. You have been married to her since you were young. She was your girlfriend. Then you made your vows to each other—and she became your wife. 15 God wants husbands and wives to become one body and one spirit. Why? So that they would have holy children and protect that spiritual unity. Don’t cheat on your wife. She has been your wife from the time you were young.

16 The Lord, the God of Israel, says, “I hate divorce, and I hate the cruel things that men do. So protect your spiritual unity. Don’t cheat on your wife.”

The Special Time of Judgment
17 You have taught wrong things, and it makes the Lord very sad. People were doing evil things, but you said that this pleased the Lord and that he accepted those things. And you taught that God does not punish people for the evil they do.

Footnotes
Malachi 2:2 blessings Words asking for good things to happen to a person who tries to obey God’s law.
Malachi 1
Malachi 3
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,675
13,131
113
I do understand how some may come to this conclusion. As like among the theological field of Christians, there also are differences in view among rabbinical teachings.
They say if you want 3 theological positions on a subject, ask 2 rabbis
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,900
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
Where did I say in this thread, "first of" in regards Daniel 10? Point to the specific post with link, and if you cannot find it, correct your abuse of me publicly.
Brother, if it was not you, I apologize. I think SDAists are Christians, but misguided on by their denominational teachings. I see part of the problem as using KJV over modern versions. Someone, claimed that Daniel 10:13(think that was the verse) should from Hebrew be translated, "first of something", when it's correct reading even to a first grade Hebrew student is "one of something". It is very simple grammar in that text. I fail to see how someone could get that completely wrong.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,900
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
Angela ain't my mother according to scripture.

Gal 4:26: "But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all."

Mat 12:50: "For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother."

Now go read Psalms 40:8 in Hebrew if it please you along with Exodus 20:8-11 in the same, then read Exodus 20:6 then John 14:15, then 1 John 2:4; Revelation 21:8, 2:2; Acts 20:30.
1 Timothy 5:1-2
Easy-to-Read Version
5 Don’t speak angrily to an older man. But talk to him as if he were your father. Treat the younger men like brothers. 2 Treat the older women like mothers. And treat the younger women with respect like sisters.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,900
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
Galatians 4
Easy-to-Read Version
4 This is what I am saying: When young children inherit all that their father owned, they are still no different from his slaves. It doesn’t matter that they own everything. 2 While they are children, they must obey those who are chosen to care for them. But when they reach the age the father set, they are free. 3 It is the same for us. We were once like children, slaves to the useless rules[a] of this world. 4 But when the right time came, God sent his Son, who was born from a woman and lived under the law. 5 God did this so that he could buy the freedom of those who were under the law. God’s purpose was to make us his children.

6 Since you are now God’s children, he has sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts. The Spirit cries out, “ Abba, Father.” 7 Now you are not slaves like before. You are God’s children, and you will receive everything he promised his children.

Paul’s Love for the Galatian Believers
8 In the past you did not know God. You were slaves to gods that were not real. 9 But now you know the true God. Really, though, it is God who knows you. So why do you turn back to the same kind of weak and useless rules you followed before? Do you want to be slaves to those things again? 10-11 It worries me that you follow teachings about special days, months, seasons, and years. I fear that my work for you has been wasted.

12 Brothers and sisters, I became like you. So please become like me. You were very good to me before. 13 You know that I came to you the first time because I was sick. That was when I told the Good News to you. 14 My sickness was a burden to you, but you did not stop showing me respect or make me leave. Instead, you welcomed me as if I were an angel from God. You accepted me as if I were Jesus Christ himself! 15 You were very happy then. Where is that joy now? I can say without a doubt that you would have done anything to help me. If it had been possible, you would have taken out your own eyes and given them to me. 16 Am I now your enemy because I tell you the truth?

17 Those people[c] are working hard to persuade you, but this is not good for you. They want to persuade you to turn against us and work hard for them. 18 It is good for you to work hard, of course, if it is for something good. That’s something you should do whether I am there or not. 19 My little children, I am in pain again over you, like a mother giving birth. I will feel this pain until people can look at you and see Christ. 20 I wish I could be with you now. Then maybe I could change the way I am talking to you. Now I don’t know what to do about you.

The Example of Hagar and Sarah
21 Some of you people want to be under the law. Tell me, do you know what the law says? 22 The Scriptures say that Abraham had two sons. The mother of one son was a slave woman, and the mother of the other son was a free woman. 23 Abraham’s son from the slave woman was born in the normal human way. But the son from the free woman was born because of the promise God made to Abraham.

24 This true story makes a picture for us. The two women are like the two agreements between God and his people. One agreement is the law that God made on Mount Sinai. The people who are under this agreement are like slaves. The mother named Hagar is like that agreement. 25 So Hagar is like Mount Sinai in Arabia. She is a picture of the earthly Jewish city of Jerusalem. This city is a slave, and all its people are slaves to the law. 26 But the heavenly Jerusalem that is above is like the free woman, who is our mother. 27 The Scriptures say,

“Be happy, woman—you who cannot have children.
Be glad you never gave birth.
Shout and cry with joy!
You never felt those labor pains.
The woman who is alone[d] will have more children
than the woman who has a husband.”

28 My brothers and sisters, you are children who were born because of God’s promise, just as Isaac was. 29 But the other son of Abraham, who was born in the normal way, caused trouble for the one who was born by the power of the Spirit. It is the same today. 30 But what do the Scriptures say? “Throw out the slave woman and her son! The son of the free woman will receive everything his father has, but the son of the slave woman will receive nothing.”[e] 31 So, my brothers and sisters, we are not children of the slave woman. We are children of the free woman.

Footnotes
Galatians 4:3 rules Or “powers.” Also in verse 9.
Galatians 4:6 Abba An Aramaic word that was used by Jewish children as a name for their fathers.
Galatians 4:17 Those people The false teachers who were bothering the believers in Galatia. See Gal. 1:7.
Galatians 4:27 woman … alone This means her husband has left her.
Galatians 4:30 Quote from Gen. 21:10.
Galatians 3

Angela ain't my mother according to scripture.

Gal 4:26: "But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all."

Mat 12:50: "For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother."

Now go read Psalms 40:8 in Hebrew if it please you along with Exodus 20:8-11 in the same, then read Exodus 20:6 then John 14:15, then 1 John 2:4; Revelation 21:8, 2:2; Acts 20:30.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,900
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
The Hebrew word "mi", like Hebrew "mah" is used in several ways not merely interrogative, but also oblique.

For instance see Ecclesiastes 1:9, 3:15; Esther 8:1; Proverbs 9:13; Nehemiah 2:12; Job 13:13; 1 Samuel 19:3; 2 Samuel 18:22,23; Numbers 23:3, etc.

While I stated that Michael means one is who is God, this does not mean I do not also simultaneously understand it in interrogative, Who is like unto God?

Every time the devil confronts Michael/Son of God, he confronts this meaning/question in the Son, and in every instance must acknowledge that the only one like unto God the Father is not himself, but is definitional of the Son/Michael.

As the Bible says, "as his name is, so is he". The Bible names are all representative of character. The Son/Michael always represents the Father, and thus the name is both interrogative (question) and statement of the character, as the Son is the "express image" of the Father's person.

Attempting to translate Michael from Hebrew to koine Greek as a question, doesn't work, see Jude 1:9; Revelation 12:7, but if translated as not a question, it does work. Try it.

There are many books which show both uses.

Again, I am not saying it is not also a question when we come into contact with the Son/Michael, but the answer is found in the same, being both beginning and ending.
https://www.hebrew4christians.com/G...rogative_Pronouns/interrogative_pronouns.html
https://uhg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/particle_interrogative.html
 
Feb 7, 2022
646
75
28
1 Timothy 5:1-2
Easy-to-Read Version
5 Don’t speak angrily to an older man. But talk to him as if he were your father. Treat the younger men like brothers. 2 Treat the older women like mothers. And treat the younger women with respect like sisters.
Yes, no doubt, but there is a condition isn't there. She, from my perspective is an unbeliever, not a believer in present truth, and thus treated as a publican of which I did not treat her wrongly at all, but spoke plainly in matters of fact and even offered her a remedy to be cured of her plague in Christian charity (1 Cor. 13), even though she is on the enemy's side. She refuses, her prerogative, love isn't about force. She wants to remain ill, so be it. She does not keep God's commandments and calls those who do a cult. I am in good company:

Acts 24:14: "But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:"

Now back to the OP topic please. This thread is not about her is it? I suspect she can handle her own affairs and if she has issue with me, she can follow Matthew 18's counsel.