Socalism & Christianity, a perfect match or a complete clash of ideologies?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
19,361
6,660
113
62
#61
While I believe Jesus was a-political, his teachings were definitely socialist-leaning.

Not like the false prophet horde of republicans that claim His name these days.
Didn't God give land to every tribe except Levi? And providing care for people would be better done through the church, not the state for a whole host of reasons.
I'm not opposed to a safety net. I don't care for the safety hammock. God ordained work before the fall. It only became difficult as a result of the fall.
There is in your assumption the idea that government does things well. They do not.
 

JohnDB

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2021
6,237
2,532
113
#62
While I believe Jesus was a-political, his teachings were definitely socialist-leaning.

Not like the false prophet horde of republicans that claim His name these days.
No...Jesus was most definitely not Socialist....He was Monarchist.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,590
9,108
113
#64
There seems to be this delusion that in countries like Britain healthcare is "free". Sure ya gotta wait a dog's age to get a hip replacement, or MRI, but at least it's free.

Where do these people think the money comes from to fund their system!

As for America, the MORE socialist and government controlled our healthcare system gets, the more expensive, inefficient, and worse it gets.

It's the same exact story with everything the gov gets involved in. Just look at the insane cost of education, especially College, since the government took over.
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
8,319
3,619
113
#65
There seems to be this delusion that in countries like Britain healthcare is "free". Sure ya gotta wait a dog's age to get a hip replacement, or MRI, but at least it's free.

Where do these people think the money comes from to fund their system!
I don't think anyone is deluded, it comes from taxes. I thought everyone knew that. I wouldn't mind paying higher taxes if it meant free healthcare.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#66
Socalism of the USSR and modern democractic socalism are different though...if we judge everybody by a historical stroke of a brush, all Catholics aredently hate Protestants and want to kill them all of

There is no where that socialism has worked that is a matter of fact. In history or today.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
19,361
6,660
113
62
#67
I don't think anyone is deluded, it comes from taxes. I thought everyone knew that. I wouldn't mind paying higher taxes if it meant free healthcare.
You would be surprised. Have you seen any of the man on the street interviews? There is a book I've had all my kids read. It's called What Ever Happened to Penny Candy. In the book the term TANSTAAFL is employed. It stands for there ain't no such thing as a free lunch. Someone always foots the bill. Kids today barely know who the president is. They know little or nothing of basic economic principles or even how money is created. I don't blame them. It just is. So there is a disconnect between the hard work done to make provision and the actual provision. Work is less and less associated with acquisition. It's little wonder that we have a generation that has grown to be entitled.
Until the value of a good days labor is again associated with a good days pay, there will likely be little change.
 
R

RichMan

Guest
#68
I mean socialist ideals....taxing the richer, universal healthcare, ect
Nothing is free. That "free" health care is pay for by someone.
Some have suggested all should pay higher taxes to fund "free" health care. WHY should a person who uses the health care system little or never, ( I am 77 years old and have used it very little)
pay for those who do. And many abuse it. I know people that seem to think they need to go see a doctor or even go to the er every time they sneeze.
As for taxing the rich, they will simply raise their salary to compensate.
That often means raising prices which in the end is paid by the consumer.
When the government gets involved, it always cost more, is less efficient, and adds to the wealth of the few.
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
8,319
3,619
113
#69
You would be surprised. Have you seen any of the man on the street interviews? There is a book I've had all my kids read. It's called What Ever Happened to Penny Candy. In the book the term TANSTAAFL is employed. It stands for there ain't no such thing as a free lunch. Someone always foots the bill. Kids today barely know who the president is. They know little or nothing of basic economic principles or even how money is created. I don't blame them. It just is. So there is a disconnect between the hard work done to make provision and the actual provision. Work is less and less associated with acquisition. It's little wonder that we have a generation that has grown to be entitled.
Until the value of a good days labor is again associated with a good days pay, there will likely be little change.
So you're for working yourself sick for very little pay and then getting gouged by wealthy doctors and hospitals so you have to file bankruptcy? Yeah, I want more of that. Healthcare is something everyone needs and it should be a right. I agree there are a lot of things people shouldn't feel entitled to, like cannabis for example. But there's no reason people should have to suffer and die simply because they don't have access to healthcare.
 
R

RichMan

Guest
#70
The Bible teaches that those who are His, he will provide food and shelter. No such promise made to the rest of humanity.
That provision has NEVER been in the form of a hand out.
When Adam sinned and was cast out of the garden, he was told he would eat through hard work.
It angers me when I see people, especially those who say they are Christians, advocate giving people anything for FREE.
It ain't free. Somebody had to work a pay for it.
I understand some are not able to work and I will freely share with them as we all should.
But please keep the corrupt, sinful, politician out of it.
All they will do is line their pockets with more wealth.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
19,361
6,660
113
62
#71
So you're for working yourself sick for very little pay and then getting gouged by wealthy doctors and hospitals so you have to file bankruptcy? Yeah, I want more of that. Healthcare is something everyone needs and it should be a right. I agree there are a lot of things people shouldn't feel entitled to, like cannabis for example. But there's no reason people should have to suffer and die simply because they don't have access to healthcare.
I'm not for government authority for anything except what the laws of any nation calls for. And the scenario you present is only a small number of the whole. I've already stated that people, particularly Christians, should help those in need. Those who cannot work will require more help. But read the story of Ruth. She could glean the fields, not raid the warehouse. There is a reason for this. Because when people begin to depend on others, they don't turn to God. God doesn't need to take from one to give to another. He gives out of His endless supply. He asks us to meet immediate needs out of our abundance, not our necessity. 2 coats, give 1. In doing so we have opportunity to be a vessel to make God known. He is what they really need. Government will never accomplish this. And it may be that the very circumstances of their lives is the means that God is using to bring them to Himself. Prodigal son.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,863
4,513
113
#73
I mean socialist ideals....taxing the richer, universal healthcare, ect
(Socialist ideals.... Okay, let us see if I can piece this Biblical story together.

King Solomon created a very weighty poll tax on his citizens which they seemed to tolerate as it brought safety and everyone universally had their own vine and the comfort under their own fig tree.)

1 Kings 4:22-25
New International Version


22 Solomon’s daily provisions were thirty cors of the finest flour and sixty cors of meal, 23 ten head of stall-fed cattle, twenty of pasture-fed cattle and a hundred sheep and goats, as well as deer, gazelles, roebucks and choice fowl. 24 For he ruled over all the kingdoms west of the Euphrates River, from Tiphsah to Gaza, and had peace on all sides. 25 During Solomon’s lifetime Judah and Israel, from Dan to Beersheba, lived in safety, everyone under their own vine and under their own fig tree.

(Then came Solomon's mission to build the Temple of the Lord so he enacted the forced labor of 30,000 men. )

1 Kings 5:13-14
New International Version


13 King Solomon conscripted laborers from all Israel—thirty thousand men. 14 He sent them off to Lebanon in shifts of ten thousand a month, so that they spent one month in Lebanon and two months at home. Adoniram was in charge of the forced labor.

(We see that Adoniram and Jeroboam were men in charge of forced labor. )

1 Kings 11:28
New International Version


28 Now Jeroboam was a man of standing, and when Solomon saw how well the young man did his work, he put him in charge of the whole labor force of the tribes of Joseph.

(In the time of Solomon we see the people putting up with high taxes and forced labor for the sake of security and universal care. But Solomon turned away from God and God used the people and surrounding nations to stir up trouble.)

1 Kings 12:1-19
English Standard Version


Rehoboam's Folly

12 Rehoboam went to Shechem, for all Israel had come to Shechem to make him king. 2 And as soon as Jeroboam the son of Nebat heard of it (for he was still in Egypt, where he had fled from King Solomon), then Jeroboam returned from Egypt. 3 And they sent and called him, and Jeroboam and all the assembly of Israel came and said to Rehoboam, 4 “Your father made our yoke heavy. Now therefore lighten the hard service of your father and his heavy yoke on us, and we will serve you.” 5 He said to them, “Go away for three days, then come again to me.” So the people went away.

6 Then King Rehoboam took counsel with the old men, who had stood before Solomon his father while he was yet alive, saying, “How do you advise me to answer this people?” 7 And they said to him, “If you will be a servant to this people today and serve them, and speak good words to them when you answer them, then they will be your servants forever.” 8 But he abandoned the counsel that the old men gave him and took counsel with the young men who had grown up with him and stood before him. 9 And he said to them, “What do you advise that we answer this people who have said to me, ‘Lighten the yoke that your father put on us’?” 10 And the young men who had grown up with him said to him, “Thus shall you speak to this people who said to you, ‘Your father made our yoke heavy, but you lighten it for us,’ thus shall you say to them, ‘My little finger is thicker than my father's thighs. 11 And now, whereas my father laid on you a heavy yoke, I will add to your yoke. My father disciplined you with whips, but I will discipline you with scorpions.’”

12 So Jeroboam and all the people came to Rehoboam the third day, as the king said, “Come to me again the third day.” 13 And the king answered the people harshly, and forsaking the counsel that the old men had given him, 14 he spoke to them according to the counsel of the young men, saying, “My father made your yoke heavy, but I will add to your yoke. My father disciplined you with whips, but I will discipline you with scorpions.”

15 So the king did not listen to the people, for it was a turn of affairs brought about by the Lord that he might fulfill his word, which the Lord spoke by Ahijah the Shilonite to Jeroboam the son of Nebat.

The Kingdom Divided

16 And when all Israel saw that the king did not listen to them, the people answered the king, “What portion do we have in David? We have no inheritance in the son of Jesse. To your tents, O Israel! Look now to your own house, David.” So Israel went to their tents. 17 But Rehoboam reigned over the people of Israel who lived in the cities of Judah. 18 Then King Rehoboam sent Adoram, who was taskmaster over the forced labor, and all Israel stoned him to death with stones. And King Rehoboam hurried to mount his chariot to flee to Jerusalem. 19 So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day.

( Rehoboam is now in charge as the people of Israel had this grievance, “Your father made our yoke heavy. Now, therefore, lighten the hard service of your father and his heavy yoke on us.” Instead of helping to decrease the burden, Rehoboam answered not only would he use whips like his father but scorpions to get them to work. In verse 16, you see the people of Israel as themselves essentially what is the incentive for this labor? Notice they had security and welfare but why was that a burden? Corruption. So they kill the Forced Laborer and the nation splits which would results in civil wars.

John Locke explains why security and welfare just aren't enough.

John Locke:
The American revolutionary generation drew many of its ideas from the English philosopher John Locke (1632-1704). Often credited as a founder of modern "liberal" thought, Locke pioneered the ideas of natural law, social contract, religious toleration, and the right to revolution that proved essential to both the American Revolution and the U.S. Constitution that followed.” — https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1257/john-locke

“TO understand political power right, and derive it from its original, we must consider, what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man.

A state also of equality, wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another; there being nothing more evident, than that creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same faculties, should also be equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection, unless the lord and master of them all should, by any manifest declaration of his will, set one above another, and confer on him, by an evident and clear appointment, an undoubted right to dominion and sovereignty.” -John Locke

God gives us human rights like life, liberty, and property. With these rights in the natural state or perfect freedom, we would be the one provider and protector of our rights within natural law. Just like a mother bear in her natural right protects her cubs. But human corruption and sin make perfect freedom not as appealing to the majority (think of the show Mountain men) as it takes great work to survive in perfect freedom. Locke explains the nature of civil society.

“Wherever, therefore, any number of men so unite into one society, as to quit everyone his executive power of the law of Nature, and to resign it to the public, there, and there only, is a political or civil society.” John Locke

A group of people gives up perfect freedom to live as freedom restrained (liberty) with the unified goal to be better protected from enemies and to be prosperous enough so all may benefit. In every society, we give up absolute freedom to abide by the laws of the land. The inner nature of perfect freedom is ingrained in every individual even if they are not willing to obtain it. But that inner nature creates an invisible hand in the sociological political system.

If the governing forces fail to properly weigh the scale of balance then the inner nature of men begins to hold grievances against the state.

Many of us are not physically whipped to work but we are forced to labor, for example, stop paying taxes, the need for food, a house, a good credit score, etc. Socialized welfare systems designed for certain classes, ages, gender, or the racial ethnicity of the person determines ones classification for such support. The rich class can afford higher taxes and often get tax breaks. The lower class often sees the most benefit from the welfare system. The middle class making up the majority of the state makes the rich richer and the taxes to support welfare kills the incentive of the middle class. Corruption takes hold as people abuse the welfare system where more middle-class people purposely quit their job or live in the lower class to get the government benefits. Putting more strain on the middle class. Not to mention the social ills of sin get very expensive in taxes for the government to try and fix.

Sin and corruption are in every eco-political system. In capitalism, we do see greed, unrestrained monopolies, and a 3-class system versus a social/communist 2-class system of the lower to an elite class.

The UK is only a fraction of the American land mass where the UK is one state versus America's 51 states united. Each state carries its own laws with much liberty to govern itself. Federalized healthcare would be a disaster just like what our Veterans have to deal with the poor healthcare of Veteran Affairs which is federalized. Government wastes money with no incentive to do better as they are one giant monopoly with no competition.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,863
4,513
113
#74
I mean socialist ideals....taxing the richer, universal healthcare, ect

The answer is not more socialism but capitalism, less government control except within law and order, restricting monopolies, stopping crime, and promoting Christian morality which combats sin and corruption. The answer starts in the home with Christian morality as that will flood into every branch of civilization. The answer should be that government breaks up Big Pharma. The answer should always be more competition as that will lower the prices of drugs and healthcare. The answer is to privatize The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) forcing it to compete and open to public scrutiny.

Telling a doctor they are forced by the government to do an abortion or sex change on a 14-year-old is forced labor. Commanding a doctor to let a child die because the state sees the cancer treatment as too expensive is what you get with social healthcare. https://thenewamerican.com/u-k-denies-treatment-to-baby-won-t-let-parents-take-him-to-u-s/

I hope this makes sense and not me rambling with no direction. We have the inner nature for perfect freedom but we sacrifice some of it for the security of a tribe, state or nation. Too much socialism eventually aggravates the inner nature of the working class.
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
8,319
3,619
113
#75
Socalism & Christianity, a perfect match or a complete clash of ideologies?
The real question is: To what extent should church and state be separated?
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
#76
I, myself, am a socalist and have been for many many years and firmly believe that a more socalist society would be better then the current one. Since I have started to study the Bible, I personally believe the Bible renforces my ideas of socalism as it talks about caring for one another, loving one another and helping out those who are less fourtante.

I was just wondering what other Christians would think of this paring?

Socialism exist in any form of government they just refer to their different programs by different names. An example from US history is the Revolutionary war fought because of "taxation without representation" (taxed it's people but gave them nothing in return). In the US things like Social Security,Medicaid,Medicare,food stamps the C-19 Stimulus programs,Operation Warp Speed ect. are examples of our Social Programs. Anyway for years now Socialism and Communism have been used as synonyms until things like the word social in Social Security don't have the same meaning anymore.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,359
29,605
113
#77
Socialism of the USSR and modern democratic socialism are different though...if we judge everybody
by a historical stroke of a brush, all Catholics aredently hate Protestants and want to kill them all off
They tried that and it did not work out very well for them ;)
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
#78
Socialism as defined by most is very different from what the Bible speaks of.
The Bible speaks of sharing with others. It also speaks of those who will not work will not eat.
Socialism today is about stealing from those who work and giving to those who do not.
Many are in need because they are lazy. Unemployable because of addictions. They will not work. Will not learn a trade. Are not willing to follow the rules. Start at the bottom and work their way up.
They want free education. A 9 to 5 position.
A perfect example are the many today living of government handouts while there millions of jobs available.
Sooner or later there will be no one left willing to work to support these lazy people.
I am all for helping those who cannot help themselves. There would be an abundance of money to help those truly in need if not for the bums living off the rest of us.

You know your right,, I was home schooled and know that public education is a "social program" and so I think that anyone who went to a free public School should pay us all back don't you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_programs_in_the_United_States
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,590
9,108
113
#79
So you're for working yourself sick for very little pay and then getting gouged by wealthy doctors and hospitals so you have to file bankruptcy? Yeah, I want more of that. Healthcare is something everyone needs and it should be a right. I agree there are a lot of things people shouldn't feel entitled to, like cannabis for example. But there's no reason people should have to suffer and die simply because they don't have access to healthcare.
This is ALWAYS going to be the ultimate end of government run healthcare. In places like Canada, where they advertise how awesome it would be if you just let them kill you. And think of the cost savings!!

 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,863
4,513
113
#80
So you're for working yourself sick for very little pay and then getting gouged by wealthy doctors and hospitals so you have to file bankruptcy? Yeah, I want more of that. Healthcare is something everyone needs and it should be a right. I agree there are a lot of things people shouldn't feel entitled to, like cannabis for example. But there's no reason people should have to suffer and die simply because they don't have access to healthcare.
With so many jobs on the market who offer benefits, it shouldn't be hard to get healthcare. Or switch jobs if you do not like your pay. Or go back to school. Or use the already already established federal healthcare like Obamacare, Medicare, or Medicaid or state assistance like WICK or food stamps.