Attacking a person is always a weak argument. Maby you should make a trip to the moon. Another perspective (point of view) is sometimes a mindopener.
Didn't attack the "person". Just demonstrated that his arguments imply he lacks even a basic understanding of science. I want to argue science, scripture and logic - if he wants to argue unprovable hypotheses, won't accept that God is more than able to communicate truthfully and adequately to man via scripture, and doesn't adhere to the basics of logic but rather practices ad hominem - there's no point debating, 'cause it's not a debate.
19 pilots, out of how much pilotes worldwide?
The question raised earlier by a Heliocentrist was "If Earth is flat, why do pilots not observe it?" or something similar. The point is, pilots do observe a Flat Earth, and at least 19 are not afraid to say so.
Use a water dropper or a spoon to place a drop of water on a hydrophobic surface; the water will form a drop with a curved exterior.
You know this is a distraction, or if not, you need to study up on scientifically legitimate methods for scaling up and scaling down an experiment.
One cannot use gravity to make water stick to a human-scale ball; the gravity of the Earth will overcome it every single time. However, that same gravity is perfectly adequate to explain the oceans "sticking" to the Earth. Why you keep arguing this point is beyond me; either you lack understanding or you're trolling... there are no other options.
So you can't provide a single example of gravity holding water to the underside of a spherical object.
Unless you're talking at the micro-level, where molecular attractive forces come into play, which are insignificant to explain forces of attraction at the macro level (e.g. when talking about Heliocentricity and water sticking to the underside of a globe). Ergo, your belief about water sticking to the underside of the globe is not testable and repeatable, and therefore is not science.
4
1
1
