Could Trump do anything to make you stop supporting him?

Reaganomics grew the middle class. We were in the midst of the roaring 80's. And lowering business taxes was the reason. When the cost of business goes down, business explodes. More money...more business activity...more jobs. Win...win...win.
It's Democrats who always increase taxes and regulation, making it expensive to do business. Businesses don't expand, people lose jobs. Less money, less business activity, and fewer jobs. Lose...lose...lose.
Then they push for more government spending. Result: inflation. Why? Because the only source of government revenue is taxes. They don't produce anything. So the increase spending doesn't produce wealth. More money is printed to cover debt. This is the source of inflation.
You have bought into lies concerning Reagan. He was an outsider. He loved America and Americans. That's why he was shot. Trump is in the same mold. He might suffer the same fate.
You are free to believe what you want about both. But you can't change economics.

Do you refuse to believe that because of corporate welfare aka Reagonomics of the 80s, the US had to borrow a significant amount of money which ultimately exponentially grew our national debt? Percentage wise, he ranks third of all time, and the most in our lifetime.

You are mistakenly using the term "revenue" when you should be using "GDP". Yes, corporate welfare does increase GDP... if you do too much corporate welfare, it also increases the national debt which we can see from the data. There needs to be a balance to yield max revenue and limit debt. Do you disagree?

Are you saying that supply side economics or voodoo economics worked?

The fact that Reagan believed in borrowing money to subsidize corporate welfare means he wasn't really an economic conservative. An example of economic conservativism would be Texas making it a state law restricting them from every going into debt. They must balance their books by law.

Economy is healthy growth. The Republicans won’t acknowledge that growth means getting more people aboard. The Democrats don’t acknowledge that unpredictable taxes makes corporate money go elsewhere.

More growth is more jobs. Under Trump, black and Hispanic employment was at all time highs. A rising tide lifts all ships.

Reagan brought in more money. The libs spent it. There was no money going to corporations. They were getting lower taxes and tax incentives.
Corporate welfare is what liberals do...give money to China to produce windmills and car companies to produce EV's.
You don't know what you are talking about.

So here's the reality, because I actually bothered to look things up:

True, but unfortunately too many ships get docked when Republicans and Democrats are fighting over the rising tide.

Republicans and Democrats will always haggle. The problem is half the people these days get government checks and the other half work and pay taxes. Those working vote for lower taxes. Those collecting checks vote for more handouts. Politicians just want to get reelected. So they overspend trying to please both sides.

I'm going to do what you do and blame the liberals whenever I don't like something or things aren't going my way. I should have used that whenever my husband came home and didn't like a purchase.

Him: "Honey, did you spend a hundred euros on an air fryer?"
Me: "It's liberal lies my love. We earned it and they spent it."

If you're going to insult people and tell them they don't know what they're talking about perhaps you should post your evidence.

I checked. Ronald Reagan almost tripled the national debt from 738 billion to 2.1 trillion.

So here's the reality, because I actually bothered to look things up:

Did Reagan have the worst growth? No, it was actually fairly okay. The economy cratered at the start but did shoot up considerably in the second half. However this came at the expense of tripling the debt... the United States went from a creditor to a debtor nation. Poverty increased and homelessness doubled. More wealth got moved upwards and the middle class suffered the most. So, the final total of income growth under Reagan was about 8%. Not awful but not the best ever.

The worst job growth was under Donald Trump. Now to be fair, some of this is certainly do to covid but even before then it was very anemic and some have argued he was coasting on the growth started under Obama. However, Obama's job growth was also weak and even though he did post about 5% income growth taxes and expenses went up even higher. So... meh.

So who was actually the worst for income and job growth? Turns out it was Bush Sr. and Bush Jr.

Who was the best? It was those well known conservative Republicans Bill Clinton followed by John F. Kennedy. In fact Bill Clinton was the last president to leave office with a surplus.

None of this is my opinion it's the official posted numbers by the Cato institute, Chamber of Commerce and so on. Check for yourselves.

'
Yep it's all about just getting reelected. Down here in Texas Abbott brag's about all the jobs he created,,thing is in Texas the minimum wage is 7.25 an hour and so 7.25x40 is 290.00x 4 means you get a wonderful job that pays 1160.00 a month and so the vast amount of people qualify for welfare... (Texas is sucking it all up,lol) https://squareup.com/us/en/the-bottom-line/managing-your-finances/your-guide-to-texas-minimum-wage#:~:text=The minimum wage in Texas is currently $7.25.,up to the current $7.25.

ThereRoseaLamb didn't say RINO she said Rhino, the way you identify a Rhino is they have a horn growing out of their nose.

Minimum wage is low in Texas because labor is cheap because of illegal alien labor. That's what happens when the labor market is flooded with a large supply of labor...the price goes down.

You agreeing with someone doesn't make it fact.
.

Trump is ahead of other Republicans and he is deeply popular with the wider electorate, as is Biden.

Why people support him is beyond a simple forum post but in a nutshell is a combination of authoritarianism/fascism, culture war nonsense and rage.

People also supported Hitler, Pol Pot, Mussalini and so on. It doesn't mean they were good leaders, it just means many people were deceived or just as hateful.

Just reading this thread is constant attacks and demonization of "the left" and Democratic voters,

along with every conspiracy theory under the sun.

It's not hard to see why he is so popular with certain people. It'd just non-stop "the left the left the left" with every wild baseless acusation under the sun up to and including murder and pedophilia. It's ridiculous.