Should artificial intelligence be allowed to evolve

Who cares if it is sentient. It can do the job better, faster, cheaper and safer than 80% of the world's workers, then it will replace 80% of the world's workers. They have tested numerous systems in 2023 and now CEOs are saying they plan on maximizing the use of AI in 2024. Tens of thousands of people are being laid off or will be laid off.

Who cares if it is sentient. It can do the job better, faster, cheaper and safer than 80% of the world's workers, then it will replace 80% of the world's workers. They have tested numerous systems in 2023 and now CEOs are saying they plan on maximizing the use of AI in 2024. Tens of thousands of people are being laid off or will be laid off.

That sounds like 80% labour camps or building pyramids.

Some surgeries are already done with robots anyway because they're more precise. They are guided by humans of course but the fine, thin-hair operations are done by the robot once programmed.

making bricks without straw comes to mind...

This explains the illogical vaccine mandates, the lockdowns, the concentration camps, etc. It was clear governments were preparing for massive civil unrest, but why? Now we know why.

Since when has a human endeavour/invention/philosophy/political system/social system/ been 100% beneficial? Do you really want a robot making life or death decisions for you? How do you stop a medical robot from being programmed to kill you if it decides that keeping you alive is not worthwhile? You think that can't happen? Robots are programmed by fallible human beings. How do you get a second opinion from a robot with a scalpel?

but there's an actual HUMAN surgical team there superintending the process, isn't there? is that what you mean by guided by humans? a team ready to step in should something go wrong, and do what the robot cannot?

Wow! Alpha Code2 performs better than 90% of competitive coders solving complex abstract problems.

Based on that I would assume there is no point in hiring coders out of college anymore. Which would you rather have, someone who scored slightly better than this but will work 40 hours a week instead of 160 and need benefits, medical and all the rest. Not only so but the Alpha Code2 is going to be improving exponentially, so your top notch coder who is slightly better this year will not be better next year.

Gemini ultra outperforms 90% of adults on massive multitask language understanding.

who will know who 🤔

https://youtube.com/shorts/rjVTe_5HXow?si=E_3sSASS7wzv3btp

Since when has a human endeavour/invention/philosophy/political system/social system/ been 100% beneficial? Do you really want a robot making life or death decisions for you? How do you stop a medical robot from being programmed to kill you if it decides that keeping you alive is not worthwhile? You think that can't happen? Robots are programmed by fallible human beings. How do you get a second opinion from a robot with a scalpel?

How many of us are going to do this to share the Gospel?

I have already heard of pastors and staff at churches that are using it. If you do that you cut Jesus out of the equation. We are supposed to be praying and listening to the Lord lead us, not let some computer program come up with our "word from God".

but should it be allowed to.

Of course there's an actual human. There will always be an actual human because a truly sentient and self-aware program doesn't exist.
There are experienced doctors in the background doing this work and the reason they use a machine is because a machine is more precise. A human hand may move 1 millimeter during an operation but a robot is steady and can be guided to move half a millimeter on the left or on the right.
This also makes surgery better because experienced doctors around the world can guide this machine via the internet.

it was not just surgical operations attached to cyBorgs it was also genetic decoding to identify illnesses and correct them,

I don't understand what you're saying here. Can you explain a bit more?

https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2022/01/dna-sequencing-technique.html?microsite=news&tab=news

To achieve super-fast sequencing speeds, the researchers needed new hardware. So Ashley contacted colleagues at Oxford Nanopore Technologies who had built a machine composed of 48 sequencing units known as flow cells. The idea was to sequence just one person’s genome using all flow cells simultaneously. The mega-machine approach was a success — almost too much. Genomic data overwhelmed the lab’s computational systems.

“We weren’t able to process the data fast enough,” Ashley said. “We had to completely rethink and revamp our data pipelines and storage systems.” Graduate student Sneha Goenka found a way to funnel the data straight to a cloud-based storage system where computational power could be amplified enough to sift through the data in real time. Algorithms then independently scanned the incoming genetic code for errors that might cause disease, and, in the final step, the scientists conducted a comparison of the patient’s gene variants against publicly documented variants known to cause disease.

This is great news! They even saved that boy's life by using this super fast method. Do you have any objections to this?