Does the sovereignty of God nullify the grace of God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,675
29,016
113
Oh I agree we cannot understand the things of God until we are saved, but doesn't say we cannot respond to salvation. It's like a baby with his mother. He cannot understand at first what she is saying but he responds and knows his mother and her voice. The Bible says that we can find Him if we seek Him, we can reach out, we can respond. We are babies at first, we can't understand, but as we grow we will learn.

From Acts 17:26-28
:)
 

ThereRoseaLamb

Well-known member
Jan 17, 2023
4,678
1,984
113
I'm not disagreeing based on the character of God, but on the basis of the ways of God. For example, God has ordained that men should be saved through the foolishness of preaching. What does it matter if one believes in election or not? Wouldn't the gospel still need to be preached in both cases?
But one is pre-selected for heaven and the other for hell. Preaching makes no sense. The elect doesn't need it and the other one can't respond to it.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
At the risk of being pummeled I'll share with you a simple outline of what TULIP means.

Disclaimer: just providingg an understanding of TULIP, and NOT necessarily my personal beliefs.

Total depravity...as a result of sin, man is born spiritually dead and the effect of Adam's sin affected man's total being...heart, mind and will.
Unconditional election...salvation is solely based on the choice of God and made effectual by grace alone through faith.
Limited atonement...Jesus sacrificial work on the cross is sufficient for and applied only to those elected and saved at some point during their lifetimes.
Irresistible grace...those elected will of a certainty come to God in faith when His grace is made manifest to them.
Perseverance of the saints...those whom God saves will be preserved in the faith and will not fall away.
what i think there saying is everyone is born dead to sin, and no one can genuinely ask to be saved
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
It's a shoot yourself in the foot belief. They believe that the elect were chosen by God before they came to earth. Which is great news for them. But the others God chose for destruction. Not for any wrong that they had done, nor any sin they had committed. God simply God them to be the losers in the cosmic bingo of life. So that means that if you aren't one of the ones God has chosen you cannot be saved. No matter how much you repent, beg or flagellate yourself your :poop: out of luck because God chose your behind for hell. And that is 100% against what the Word teaches. I can give Scripture as long as your arm to prove that is wrong.
isn't that what Mormonism believe and isn't that like saying all people who suffer from the day they are born deserve it.

Do they call that fatalism or something.
 

ThereRoseaLamb

Well-known member
Jan 17, 2023
4,678
1,984
113
isn't that what Mormonism believe and isn't that like saying all people who suffer from the day they are born deserve it.

Do they call that fatalism or something.
Possibly, I had read up on what they believe but that was some years ago. I would have to go back and look it up again.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
18,721
6,437
113
62
Yeo but are they saying no one can ask to be saved because everyone is born dead to sin ?
No. Everyone should be encouraged to call upon the name of the Lord.
Yeo but are they saying no one can ask to be saved because everyone is born dead to sin ?
I'm not saying anything. You asked about TULIP, and I gave you a brief overview of it. I haven't said what I personally believe. I almost didn't do it because people don't seem to be able to distinguish between someone outlining a particular set of beliefs and what someone purpots to believe. That's why I gave the disclaimer.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
No. Everyone should be encouraged to call upon the name of the Lord.

I'm not saying anything. You asked about TULIP, and I gave you a brief overview of it. I haven't said what I personally believe. I almost didn't do it because people don't seem to be able to distinguish between someone outlining a particular set of beliefs and what someone purpots to believe. That's why I gave the disclaimer.
I never said you said that lol.

But what I am saying is Calvinist are Christian Muslims 😂
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
18,721
6,437
113
62
But one is pre-selected for heaven and the other for hell. Preaching makes no sense. The elect doesn't need it and the other one can't respond to it.
Regardless of what you believe, if God prescribes a particular way, the only way for it to happen is to follow the prescribed way.

Let's say God says that to be saved one must rub their belly. Through the foolishness of belly rubbing one must be saved. It wouldn't matter whether you believed in election or not. You would still have to rub your belly.

Now...substitute preaching for belly rubbing. God uses the foolishness of preaching to save people. He never asks do you believe you are elect or not?
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
Regardless of what you believe, if God prescribes a particular way, the only way for it to happen is to follow the prescribed way.

Let's say God says that to be saved one must rub their belly. Through the foolishness of belly rubbing one must be saved. It wouldn't matter whether you believed in election or not. You would still have to rub your belly.

Now...substitute preaching for belly rubbing. God uses the foolishness of preaching to save people. He never asks do you believe you are elect or not?
what are you waffling on about now lol.

I can't twig here, you've lost me haha
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
735
267
63
But one is pre-selected for heaven and the other for hell. Preaching makes no sense. The elect doesn't need it and the other one can't respond to it.
If we take it( Arbitrarily saving/electing) to its logical conclusion, Christ crucified makes no sense and is of no effect.

Biblically, Jesus satisfied God's Justice on the cross. So mankind has to go through the Justice of God in order to be saved by His Grace.....And that is Faith alone in Christ alone. If God just arbitrarily saved through His sovereignty, it would impugn His Justice. And make Christ and His work of no effect.

The false belief of God electing people to salvation is dangerous for our witness for Christ.And it begs the question......Did the person who thinks they were just willy nilly elected to salvation.......ever truly make a personal objective choice for the Lord Jesus Christ?
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
18,721
6,437
113
62
what i think there saying is everyone is born dead to sin, and no one can genuinely ask to be saved
I don't believe that. The pattern of scripture is much like the pattern found in Isaiah.
Chapter 53...salvation is explained
Chapter 54...the benefits of salvation are extolled
Chapter 55...a call is given to receive the aforementioned salvation
Chapter 56...how to live out salvation

This is what any good preaching will preach. And smart preachers know to leave the results to God.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,769
113
Could it be interpreted though.. that they are saying the Holy Spirit enables them to believe, rather than saying they are converted before belief?
Please note these words carefully from the Westminster Confession which speaks about "effectual calling": "...being quickened and renewed by the Holy Spirit..." To be "quickened" means to be brought to life from the dead. To be "renewed" means to be regenerated (born again). So here is a so-called "elect" person being spiritually brought to life and even regenerated WITHOUT HAVING OBEYED THE GOSPEL FIRST.

But what saith the Scripture? But as many as received Him, to them gave He power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on His name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. (John 1:12,13)

So first comes the "believing on His name". Which means believing everything about Christ, including His death. burial, and resurrection. Then comes the "receiving Him", which includes genuine repentance, and receiving Christ as one's Lord and Savior. Only then does a sinner receive the gift of the Holy Spirit, and only then does the Holy Spirit supernaturally quicken and regenerate the believer.

In order to accommodate the false gospel of TULIP, everything in the Bible is turned on its head. The apostle Paul would strongly condemn this false gospel.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,675
29,016
113
I'm not saying anything. You asked about TULIP, and I gave you a brief overview of it.
I haven't said what I personally believe. I almost didn't do it because people don't seem
to be able to distinguish between someone outlining a particular set of beliefs and what
someone purports to believe. That's why I gave the disclaimer.
Reminds me of the Calvinist who kept insisting I believe something I do not, even when I could
show him close to fifty (50) posts that contradicted what he claimed. He also said that because
I was explaining Arminianism, it meant I believed that, too, even though I could show him posts
where I was likewise explaining Calvinism. Some people just cannot be reasoned with, regardless.
I also explain Molinism when it seems appropriate. That may be closer to what I actually believe.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
18,721
6,437
113
62
Reminds me of the Calvinist who kept insisting I believe something I do not, even when I could
show him close to fifty (50) posts that contradicted what he claimed. He also said that because
I was explaining Arminianism, it meant I believed that, too, even though I could show him posts
where I was likewise explaining Calvinism. Some people just cannot be reasoned with, regardless.
I also explain Molinism when it seems appropriate. That may be closer to what I actually believe.
I don't think he was actually doing it. I think I misread his post. But I think I might just start Camism and simply refer people to a website that doesn't exist.