Christian Nationalist Movement in the United States
- Thread starter SilverFox7
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Hard to disagree.
If you folks out there have not done this yet, you should review the speeches and writings of the founders and prominent politicians / leaders in early America. The Northwest Ordinance is one example. George Washington's fairwell address is another (I believe he made two of these?? And the one I'm referring to is the second??). In it, they talk about Christianity (or "religion", as they termed it back then) being "encouraged" in the public square. It was not to be treated as cudgel to force people to practice it, but to try to make sure that people grew up fearing the God of the Bible (or at least be educated about Biblical morality), so that we wouldn't deteriorate into a police state or face the judgment of God. And, Jews, e.g., were not legally prosecuted for practicing their faith, so there was no theocracy intended.
The Left rewrites history, then lies about the present. They invert everything, as Dennis Prager might say: History is changeable, but it is the future that is fixed.
If you folks out there have not done this yet, you should review the speeches and writings of the founders and prominent politicians / leaders in early America. The Northwest Ordinance is one example. George Washington's fairwell address is another (I believe he made two of these?? And the one I'm referring to is the second??). In it, they talk about Christianity (or "religion", as they termed it back then) being "encouraged" in the public square. It was not to be treated as cudgel to force people to practice it, but to try to make sure that people grew up fearing the God of the Bible (or at least be educated about Biblical morality), so that we wouldn't deteriorate into a police state or face the judgment of God. And, Jews, e.g., were not legally prosecuted for practicing their faith, so there was no theocracy intended.
The Left rewrites history, then lies about the present. They invert everything, as Dennis Prager might say: History is changeable, but it is the future that is fixed.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
Funny, when you mentioned his name I thought of someone else, whose name escapes me now,
but he is one of those prosperity teachers who is quite wealthy. And he looks creepy LOL. So I tried
to find his name and put wealthy Christians in my search field, and who they listed was disturbing LOL.
People like Oprah Winfrey, who, yes, says she is a Christian, while denying what Jesus explicitly said.
but he is one of those prosperity teachers who is quite wealthy. And he looks creepy LOL. So I tried
to find his name and put wealthy Christians in my search field, and who they listed was disturbing LOL.
People like Oprah Winfrey, who, yes, says she is a Christian, while denying what Jesus explicitly said.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
No problem from a Christian point of view. Do a deep dive into those on a regular basis.
My issue was a secular literary critical usage of deconstruction that broke literature down to the Nth degree analyzing the atomic level of the text. That can really diminish the artistic and creative experience of great literature like the Bible. It's important to have the forest viewed and understood clearly as a whole before venturing into it without the proper materials to explore the details.
My issue was a secular literary critical usage of deconstruction that broke literature down to the Nth degree analyzing the atomic level of the text. That can really diminish the artistic and creative experience of great literature like the Bible. It's important to have the forest viewed and understood clearly as a whole before venturing into it without the proper materials to explore the details.
-
1
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Hundreds of them were in that crowd of PEACEFUL protesters instigating anything that they could bring charges on them and demonize them in the press.
A long time ago 3 dirtbags, who were unknown Judas' were invited to a church function, repayed the kindness shown them by trying to pull the wool over our eyes. Even though we were caught off guard, the Lord provided wisdom to handle it perfectly and verbally expose them.
Not all of the 3 letters are bad guys. I've been blessed to see some get saved, then baptized and continue to grow. So I want to be real clear about that. However, I no longer have patience for criminals who use their positions in law enforcement to commit crimes and then try to tempt/direct innocent decent people. They are psycho and sociopaths who have no problem committing crimes to imprison, torture or murder entire populations of people. We learned that from history.
A long time ago 3 dirtbags, who were unknown Judas' were invited to a church function, repayed the kindness shown them by trying to pull the wool over our eyes. Even though we were caught off guard, the Lord provided wisdom to handle it perfectly and verbally expose them.
Not all of the 3 letters are bad guys. I've been blessed to see some get saved, then baptized and continue to grow. So I want to be real clear about that. However, I no longer have patience for criminals who use their positions in law enforcement to commit crimes and then try to tempt/direct innocent decent people. They are psycho and sociopaths who have no problem committing crimes to imprison, torture or murder entire populations of people. We learned that from history.
-
2
- Show all
This is just the Left's propaganda, trying to deflect from their own fascist aims. Classic Alinsky.
I'm a Christian nationalist. I'm a Christian first, an American patriot second. If that's wrong, then I don't want to be right! (Well, in a manner of speaking
)
I'm a Christian nationalist. I'm a Christian first, an American patriot second. If that's wrong, then I don't want to be right! (Well, in a manner of speaking
)
Not just hard right and those distinctions have now disappeared. "Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy". Do you see these elements in the Biden administration? Weaponizing the justice system (for example) was in fact "forcible suppression of opposition". The DC Gulag for J6 victims is still there.
So the current "Democratic" party is in fact Marxist/Communist/Fascist/Anarchist/Racist all at the same time. The border chaos is anarchist and the promotion of DEI and CRT is racist. You can figure out the Marxist/Communist aspects for yourself. Saul Alinsky was a Communist from whom Obama learned many destructive principles (now being carried out by Biden).
So the current "Democratic" party is in fact Marxist/Communist/Fascist/Anarchist/Racist all at the same time. The border chaos is anarchist and the promotion of DEI and CRT is racist. You can figure out the Marxist/Communist aspects for yourself. Saul Alinsky was a Communist from whom Obama learned many destructive principles (now being carried out by Biden).
-
1
- Show all
Nope. You don't have two authoritarian systems on opposite ends of the same ideological spectrum.
Fascism was an offshoot of socialism, or a modified form of it. It wasn't "opposite" communism. Remember that Hitler and Mussolini were socialists before they became known as fascists. They did not radically swing from one side to the other side ideologically.
Both systems are police states. Both systems run the economy from the top down. Both systems do not allow dissent from the god-state's narrative. Both are collectivist systems. The individual does not matter (unless they mouth off at the State lol). Please show one significant difference between communism and fascism.
The ideological spectrum is just that: a line from right to left, becoming increasingly authoritarian or anarchistic, depending on which direction you're going.
Fascism was an offshoot of socialism, or a modified form of it. It wasn't "opposite" communism. Remember that Hitler and Mussolini were socialists before they became known as fascists. They did not radically swing from one side to the other side ideologically.
Both systems are police states. Both systems run the economy from the top down. Both systems do not allow dissent from the god-state's narrative. Both are collectivist systems. The individual does not matter (unless they mouth off at the State lol). Please show one significant difference between communism and fascism.
The ideological spectrum is just that: a line from right to left, becoming increasingly authoritarian or anarchistic, depending on which direction you're going.
-
2
-
1
-
1
- Show all
I remember my poli-sci. prof. making an x-axis line on the board showing the right extreme as facist and left extreme as communist kind of like the graph below:
I can see from Britannica that there are different approaches to this model as you and Nehemiah have noted. I like this quote:
"For example, though Stalinist communists would fall to the extreme left on the traditional left/right axis and Nazis would fall to the extreme right, Eysenck’s model would classify both as extreme examples of “tough-mindedness.”"
Source: Political spectrum | Definition, Chart, Examples, & Left Versus Right | Britannica
What kind of monster would a communist fascist be called? Certainly not Godzilla; how about Goshzilla?
I can see from Britannica that there are different approaches to this model as you and Nehemiah have noted. I like this quote:
"For example, though Stalinist communists would fall to the extreme left on the traditional left/right axis and Nazis would fall to the extreme right, Eysenck’s model would classify both as extreme examples of “tough-mindedness.”"
Source: Political spectrum | Definition, Chart, Examples, & Left Versus Right | Britannica
What kind of monster would a communist fascist be called? Certainly not Godzilla; how about Goshzilla?
-
2
-
1
-
1
- Show all