(Psalms 103:5) (Is The Earth is Not a Globe or is The Earth a Globe?)

Another patently ignorant meme.

When you're in a moving vehicle, it is not moving relative to you. It "feels" stationary. You don't feel like you're moving relative to the vehicle because you aren't, yet when you look outside you realize you are moving, and will normally feel the de/acceleration associated with that movement.

Similarly, on a moving planet, you don't notice the movement normally, because you're moving consistently with the planet. It's not changing velocity so you don't notice its movement, but you may observe the fact of movement by noting the changing position of the sun, moon, and stars relative to your location.

You can be seated inside an aircraft flying at 600 km per hour. If passengers were splattered inside the fuselage, FE adherents would have a point. I've flown a bit. So far, so good. Now if the earth stopped rotating all of a sudden, we'd be in real trouble.

(Psalms 103:5)

Psalm 103
Of David.
1 Praise the Lord, my soul;
all my inmost being, praise his holy name.
2 Praise the Lord, my soul,
and forget not all his benefits—
3 who forgives all your sins
and heals all your diseases,
4 who redeems your life from the pit
and crowns you with love and compassion,
5 who satisfies your desires with good things
so that your youth is renewed like the eagle’s.

Uh huh. Relevance is such a beautiful thing.

yes

It did that once, according to your model. Nothing out of the ordinary transpired.

moving in a circle does induce a tangential acceleration which can be felt and is measurable.

it's called the coriolis force. entire structural engineering courses in architectural schools are dedicated to it.

@Conformed thank you for idiotically highlighting yet another proof the earth isn't flat at the expense of your own reputation for intelligence and/or credibility. a noble sacrifice.

because God knows what He is doing, yes.

it was extremely out of the ordinary, but He kept His beloved safe. that was the point.

If astronomical works be searched through and through, there will not be found a single instance of a bold, unhesitating, or manly statement respecting a proof of the Earth’s “rotundity.” Proctor speaks of “proofs which serve to show … that the Earth is not flat,” and says that man “finds reason to think that the Earth is not flat,” and speaks of certain matters being “explained by supposing” that the Earth is a globe; and says that people have “assured themselves that it is a globe;” but he says, also, that there is a “most complete proof that the Earth is a globe:” just as though anything in the world could possibly be wanted but a proof—a proof that proves and settles the whole question. This, however, all the money in the United States Treasury would not buy; and, unless the astronomers are all so rich that they don’t want the cash, it is a sterling proof that the Earth is not a globe.

When a man speaks of a “most complete” thing amongst several other things which claim to be what that thing is, it is evident that they must fall short of something which the “most complete” thing possesses. And when it is known that the “most complete” thing is an entire failure, it is plain that the others, all and sundry, are worthless. Proctor’s “most complete proof that the Earth is a globe” lies in what he calls “the fact” that distances from place to place agree with calculation. But, since the distance round the Earth at 45 “degrees” south of the equator is twice the distance it would be on a globe, it follows that what the greatest astronomer of the age calls “a fact” is NOT a fact; that his “most complete proof” is a most complete failure; and that he might as well have told us, at once, that he has NO PROOF to give us at all. Now, since, if the Earth be a globe, there would, necessarily, be piles of proofs of it all round us, it follows that when astronomers, with all their ingenuity, are utterly unable to point one out—to say nothing about picking one up—that they give us a proof that Earth is not a globe.

The surveyor’s plans in relation to the laying of the first Atlantic Telegraph cable, show that in 1665 miles—from Valentia, Ireland, to St. John’s, Newfoundland—the surface of the Atlantic Ocean is a LEVEL surface—not the astronomers’ “level,” either! The authoritative drawings, published at the time, are a standing evidence of the fact, and form a practical proof that Earth is not a globe.

pretty sure there is a part of the TOS dealing with plagiarism.

when you quote a masonic liar, you should identify your text as a quote, specifically being the words of a well known masonic liar purposefully designed for decieving people that he considered to be idiotic and ignorant, to convince them the world is flat.

instead of formatting your text as tho it is your own thoughts, you need to cite your sources. you agreed to the TOS. don't be a liar.

we all know from much evidence and experience you don't have any thoughts of your own.

The earth which will never moves will be replaced with a new earth.

If the Earth were a globe, it would, if we take Valentia to be the place of departure, curvate downwards, in the 1665 miles across the Atlantic to Newfoundland, according to the astronomers’ own tables, more than three-hundred miles; but, as the surface of the Atlantic does not do so—the fact of its levelness having been clearly demonstrated by Telegraph Cable surveyors,—it follows that we have a grand proof that Earth is not a globe.

you clearly aren't the kind of person who says things like "the surveyors plans"

a bit simpler of mind than that.

dead giveaway.
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/55387/pg55387-images.html

this is the second time i have shown you are plagiarizing this site without giving them their due recognition.