Independent Women

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 26, 2014
4,455
2,440
113
#21
Hey guys, there's something I've been wondering about and thought I'd get some outside perspectives.

Lately I keep hearing guys refer to "Independent women" in a very negative way. They mention how unattractive it is and how silly it is for a woman to think she doesn't "need" a man.

I get that men and women are designed to compliment each other's strengths and weaknesses. No argument there. But there's plenty of us ladies who have entered middle age and realize that we might never have a man looking out for us. So, in that case......wouldn't it be silly for us to go about "needing" something we don't have? Isn't the logical course of action to figure out how to make do without something you might NEVER have? :unsure:

Perhaps I am misunderstanding what men mean by "independent". I would have thought it just meant a woman who pays her own bills, doesn't make her problems other people's problems, and probably won't call you sobbing from the side of the road because she forgot to put gas in the car. But maybe I'm mistaken about that, and men are referring to something else entirely?

Anyways, thoughts? I realize that not all men are turned off by independence, I'm just curious why anyone would be..... seems like its a good trait regardless of gender, yet I generally hear it like it's a bad thing for women and a good thing for men. :unsure:
The cynical side of me thinks that when such men disparage "independent women" they really mean women who won't consider dating them or any other guy that doesn't have a lot to offer.

I mean yeah, there's some really nasty women who act like they're insulted by a guy trying to be helpful. But for the most part I think the men who complain about women being too independent are the ones who don't have anything to attract an emotionally healthy competent woman. They probably complain about how all their ex girlfriends used them for money and expected them to be responsible adults too.
 
Apr 18, 2013
9,780
2,825
113
#22
- I keep hearing guys refer to "Independent women" in a very negative way.
- They mention. how unattractive it is and how silly it is for a woman to think she doesn't "need" a man.
You would need to ask each person using these terms to explain what they mean... everyone may be a little different.

When someone says these things, you need to say, "What do you mean by that?"
Then you'll have an answer.

Personally, I might talk about 3rd and 4th wave feminism, and how it promotes "disliking" men.
I think that's a problem.
There is obviously a huge difference between disliking the opposite sex, and simply not having a spouse and getting on with your life.

Have a great weekend.
.
 
May 17, 2015
2,952
1,637
113
48
#23
Here's one way I look at it:

A woman who brags about being "independent" isn't really independent at all. In fact, she's dependent on what others think of her. Otherwise, she wouldn't make it a point to announce it to the whole world. The bragging and boasting is what turns a lot of men off.

A lion doesn't need to remind other animals or humans that it's a lion. It just exists and does its thing.

Likewise, a woman who is truly independent and who doesn't want a relationship with a man just lives her life that way without many people noticing.
 

MsMediator

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2022
1,253
832
113
#24
"Independent" woman just means she can take care of herself and isn't needy (more usually and specifically, financially) on a guy. Guys want women who need them, but not "needy" women. This can be confusing. It might be better to describe an independent woman as financially-independent, but that also sounds bad as though she is rich. Also, most independent women do not describe themselves as independent, but it is a label that others put on them. I can see why the term independent can put someone off. For example, if a man described himself as an "independent" man, that could suggest something bad like he doesn't want/need/like women. Back to my main point, independent just means financially-independent.
 
Jan 31, 2025
36
20
8
#25
The cynical side of me thinks that when such men disparage "independent women" they really mean women who won't consider dating them or any other guy that doesn't have a lot to offer.

I mean yeah, there's some really nasty women who act like they're insulted by a guy trying to be helpful. But for the most part I think the men who complain about women being too independent are the ones who don't have anything to attract an emotionally healthy competent woman. They probably complain about how all their ex girlfriends used them for money and expected them to be responsible adults too.
"Never let a man do anything for you they never do anything unless there's something it it for them." This sound bitter but it's actually good advise. The ones that are offish are probably divorcee. woman that have been hurt so all men are to blame. Also woman don't tend to remarry as often as men do. Also Independence sometimes comes as a result of a divorce. I agree on your other points.
 
Jul 7, 2022
11,006
4,725
113
Almost Heaven West Virginia
#27
Here's one way I look at it:

A woman who brags about being "independent" isn't really independent at all. In fact, she's dependent on what others think of her. Otherwise, she wouldn't make it a point to announce it to the whole world. The bragging and boasting is what turns a lot of men off.

A lion doesn't need to remind other animals or humans that it's a lion. It just exists and does its thing.

Likewise, a woman who is truly independent and who doesn't want a relationship with a man just lives her life that way without many people noticing.

[
 
May 10, 2011
1,744
356
83
#29
It's all in the additude you have when you say you are independent.

There are some women who say it like, I don't need no man! I can handle my own business and men better back off! They are the female equivalent of MGTOW. They have a tendency to talk a lot about the patriarchy and disparage women who do get married.
I actually don't really refer to myself as "independent", partly because most men seem to find the phrase upsetting, and partly because I don't really get the point in announcing that.

Independence unfortunately often means independence from God. That is not a strength, it is a weakness.

Many women (and men) are overconfident. There have been experiments to show this. A group men and a group of women were left to fend for themselves in the wild. The men had a fire going, shelters made and were cooking food while the women were still wondering where to start. Men generally are task oriented and highly focused (which infuriates some women). Women have the ability to think about a number of things and are a lot more flexible.
In this case I am not referring to independence from God, only to "needing" a husband/provider (though I do value men and I would like to get married). In my early/mid 20's I felt I "needed" a husband, and couldn't be happy without one. Eventually I learned to find my joy and purpose in the Lord. Now I don't feel as if I "need" a husband, but when I mention this (in response to guys stating that women need men), most guys seem to find the notion silly or naive. They refer to studies like the one you mentioned that are supposed to demonstrate to me how incompetent and illogical I must be since I am female. Men who actually know me don't generally say things like that; I'm referring more to casual acquaintances and random men on the internet.

The other time I hear the phrase used is when men in their 30s, 40s, and 50s are explaining that they need to find a wife in her 20s because women over 30 are "too independent". Which is fine, people are entitled to search for a spouse in any demographic they choose, and I know age factors in when you consider childbirth. But the flipside of that is all the women who now HAVE to be independent because most of the men in their age range are still dead-set on finding a cute 20-something.

I realize that plenty of men do not have this mindset; I am merely explaining the context in which I typically hear the phrase used. :giggle:
 
May 10, 2011
1,744
356
83
#31
If the frame of reference is spiritual, an independent woman in the Lord has made peace with her circumstances. She doesn't need to be interdependent with a man, because she's dependent on God.

That can grind a man's gears when he's not spiritually mature, because no male is wholly fulfilled by himself, doing things for himself, since the strength of a male is in what he can do for the ones he loves. He wants to be needed and needs to be wanted.

Males want to be the alpha to the females in their life, which is no bad thing. But the natural man isn't conscious of Who the actual Alpha in the life of a child of God is, hence all the head-scratching when a woman of faith is at peace, having no burning necessity for a man.
This was very interesting, especially the part I put in bold. I wonder if, when I guy says "you need a man", he is actually thinking that he needs a woman :unsure:.


It is unfortunate in our day and time that lifetime marriages...til death do we part...are not the norm. This has thrust women into roles and situations that God never intended. It has also made it more difficult for women who have had to assume independence to relinquish it in future relationships. While this is understandable at one level, on another level, it makes it difficult for them to fully accept a dependent role. I think there are 2 reasons for this:
...not fully trusting that a new partner will remain faithful,
...and having liked a degree of autonomy, wanting to maintain it.

Both are manageable enough if both parties are flexible. The man should recognize these tendencies and allow a measure of independence, and the woman should learn again to trust that both her new partner and God desire her best.

Relationships always come with baggage. Loving another person intimately bears all things.
Interesting. I think you probably touched on some of the reasons this topic is an issue for me. I'll be reading back through and re-processing what everyone has said. :cool:(y)
 
May 10, 2011
1,744
356
83
#32
Oh there are quite a few middle age guys out there that don't have a woman to aggravate. It balances out I think.
Oh, I did not mean to imply that there are more single middle-aged women than men, I'd guess the numbers are close to equal. I just meant that once ladies hit 40 and are still single, we can either be a dumpster fire or we can be independent. But apparently choosing the independence route makes us undesirable to a lot of guys. :unsure:

Rewrite your resume:
Shotgun rider seeking wheel man
Industrious
Independent thinker
Lol nope, I'm driving and he's shooting, it's the natural order of things :cool::p

Seriously though, I'm not on the market right now so this thread isn't about trying to snag a dude. I'm just curious about a mindset I've encountered a lot lately.
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
28,205
9,960
113
#33
"Never let a man do anything for you they never do anything unless there's something it it for them." This sound bitter but it's actually good advise.
Um... Nope.

I mean you can try to find an ulterior motive every time a guy tries to help you. It will ruin a lot of the joy in your life and it will be really unfair to the men who just like to help people, but you can live your life that way if you want to.

But there are some people, men and women, who just help people. Not because they expect anything back. Not because they are looking for any advantage. Just because they like to be helpful.
 
Jan 30, 2025
41
31
18
#34
Here's one way I look at it:

A woman who brags about being "independent" isn't really independent at all. In fact, she's dependent on what others think of her. Otherwise, she wouldn't make it a point to announce it to the whole world
Totally. Empty vessels make the most noise.
This was very interesting, especially the part I put in bold. I wonder if, when I guy says "you need a man", he is actually thinking that he needs a woman :unsure:.
You said it. Some of the men you'll rub shoulders with, will unconsciously assign their own position to you.

Personal context is important though, because if a female implied that I needed a woman in my life, I would dare say she was hitting on me!
 
Nov 14, 2024
1,365
925
113
#36
"Never let a man do anything for you they never do anything unless there's something it it for them." This sound bitter but it's actually good advise.
This may come as a shock to you, but there are some genuine Christian men in this world, and this is horrible advice where such men are concerned. Where potential Christian husbands are concerned, Christ is the example. In other words, in the same manner in which Christ sacrificially laid his life down for the church, a Christian husband will seek to lay his own life down for his wife. To even suggest that such a godly man would never do anything for a woman unless there is something in it for him is pure evil.
 
Nov 14, 2024
1,365
925
113
#37
In this case I am not referring to independence from God, only to "needing" a husband/provider (though I do value men and I would like to get married).
I am not saying this in any sort of mocking or derogatory way, but there is an upside to all of this. In other words, if you would like to get married, and if you are running into men who hold to such wrong views of the type of independent women that you have described, then it seems as if you have a means by which to weed out many wrong prospects, and you should be thankful for that.

Assuming that you would like to marry a Christian man someday, just keep your eyes open for a man who has actually prepared himself to be the type of husband that God has ordained men to be. You know, someone who would sacrificially lay his life down for you, who would wash you with the water of God's word, and who would nourish and cherish you as his own flesh.

Such men are rare, but I would like to think that they do exist somewhere.

The ones who complain about "independent women?"

Excuse my plainness of speech, but it has been my experience that men who complain about women have never taken the time to work on themselves. If they had, then they would be seeking God's face for a godly woman, and not just going around and complaining.

Finally, to be fair to the genuine Christian men who are out there, in your waiting season, you (and all women) need to make sure that you are similarly preparing yourself to be the type of godly woman that God desires to match with a godly man. I am not suggesting that you have not been doing the same. Instead, I am merely stating that a potential marriage is a two-way street, and both sides need to prepare themselves aforetime in the manner in which God describes in scripture. If they do not, then there are going to be some major problems down the line.
 
Nov 14, 2024
1,365
925
113
#38
I will bow out of this conversation with a simple question for everyone.

There are probably millions, if not billions, of people in this world who talk about what they want in a relationship. In your estimation, what percentage of those people have truly prepared themselves before the Lord in order to give him what he wants in a relationship? In other words, what percentage of those people have truly submitted themselves unto the Lord and his word in order to be fashioned into the type of godly husband or godly wife that God has described in scripture?

I wish you all a blessed day.