Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
4,731
597
113
by teaching Him and upon his hearing and learning and believing (by choice as some rightly say) he's entered into Christ and given God Spirit by grace through faith.
But it's also written that all that the Father gives to the Son WILL [effectively] come to Him and that all that come to him, the Son will give eternal life (Jn 17:2). "Hearing, learning and believing" are all part of the sanctification-birthing process of salvation (2Thes 2:13; 1Pet 1:2), which results in believing the Truth! Sanctification by the Spirit in the souls of God's elect even precedes their Justification (1Cor 6:11).
 
Oct 29, 2023
4,888
673
113
What say you re: foreknowledge?
ProginOskO simple means to know someone before the later time implied by the context. If I take a break from ChristianChat and rejoin, I may correspond with some members I foreknew, members I knew before breaking from CC. It means to have had an earlier knowledge of or relationship with someone.

Here, Paul is claiming that his contemporary Jews foreknew him, knew him before his conversion to Christ.

Act 26:4 My manner of life from my youth, which was at the first among mine own nation at Jerusalem, know all the Jews;
Act 26:5 Which knew (προγινώσκοντές, present active participle) me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee.

In terms of events, proginOskO means to have knowledge of some event before it happens. If I have an appointment with the dentist tomorrow, I foreknow that I will be at the dentist's tomorrow.

In neither case does it imply per se an eternal knowledge from before creation. If, at some point in time, God makes a plan for something to happen in the future, He foreknows it from that point onwards.

Isa 48:3 I have declared the former things from the beginning of my deciding on them; and they went forth out of my mouth, and I showed them; I did them suddenly, and they came to pass.
Isa 48:4 Because I knew that you are obstinate, and your neck is an iron sinew, and your brow brass;
Isa 48:5 I have even from the beginning declared it to you; before it came to pass I showed it you: lest you should say, My idol has done them, and my graven image, and my molten image, has commanded them.

Isa 48:6 You have heard, see all this; and will not you declare/admit it? I have showed you new things from this time, even hidden things, and you did not know them. before I showed them
Isa 48:7 Now ( עַתָּה ) they have been brought into being ( נִבְרְאוּ , niphal perfective), and not ( וְלֹא ) from the beginning ( מֵאָז ), when I first thought of them, but before the day ( וְלִפְנֵי־יוֹם ) that they happened; and not ( וְלֹא ) you heeded them ( שְׁמַעְתָּם . qal perfective) when I told you of them, so that you are not saying ( פֶּן־תֹּאמַר , qal imperfective ), "Behold ( הִנֵּה ), I knew them ( יְדַעְתִּין׃ )".
48:7 עַתָּה נִבְרְאוּ וְלֹא מֵאָז וְלִפְנֵי־יוֹם וְלֹא שְׁמַעְתָּם פֶּן־תֹּאמַר הִנֵּה יְדַעְתִּין׃

Now they have been brought into being (niphal perfective). And they were not brought into being immediately, but they were brought into being before the day they happened. And you did not heed them (qal perfective) when I announced them, so that you cannot now be saying (qal imperfective), "Behold, I knew them, that they would happen."

Things God has thought of doing to demonstrate His sovereign power, He announces in advance. But He delays the fulfilment, so that men end up denying they will happen. Then they happen, and because men have already denied they would happen, they cannot, after they happen, say "We already knew they would happen." Hence God is proven true and men have to admit God has indeed brought to pass what He said He would bring to pass.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
4,731
597
113
You seem to conveniently ignore the fact that Enoch [taken up by God] is the great great great Grandfather of Noah and Noah would have been taught about God from birth.
Now, your trying to tell us that God doesn't work providentially in his elect's lives? Was Noah Enoch's great, great grandaddy by accident or coincidence?

Furthermore, you have no idea what Noah learned (if anything at all) from Enoch. You're simply assuming.

Btw, how are you coming along with your investigation of the Chicken or Egg Syndrome in the Exodus account? Have you figured out who hardened who first?
 

lrs68

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2024
1,417
386
83
Why would he? It's still true.
And I know what you're saying is true. Some people just don't realize that man has that created ability and they created a Doctrine based on literally denying this simple truth whether man acts upon it or not. Or if they know but say otherwise then that makes it harder to accept their claims. Most of my discussion viewpoints stems around what is being claimed based off of are they ignoring other truths or denying them.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
4,731
597
113
ProginOskO simple means to know someone before the later time implied by the context. If I take a break from ChristianChat and rejoin, I may correspond with some members I foreknew, members I knew before breaking from CC. It means to have had an earlier knowledge of or relationship with someone.

Here, Paul is claiming that his contemporary Jews foreknew him, knew him before his conversion to Christ.

Act 26:4 My manner of life from my youth, which was at the first among mine own nation at Jerusalem, know all the Jews;
Act 26:5 Which knew (προγινώσκοντές, present active participle) me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee.

In terms of events, proginOskO means to have knowledge of some event before it happens. If I have an appointment with the dentist tomorrow, I foreknow that I will be at the dentist's tomorrow.

In neither case does it imply per se an eternal knowledge from before creation. If, at some point in time, God makes a plan for something to happen in the future, He foreknows it from that point onwards.

Isa 48:3 I have declared the former things from the beginning of my deciding on them; and they went forth out of my mouth, and I showed them; I did them suddenly, and they came to pass.
Isa 48:4 Because I knew that you are obstinate, and your neck is an iron sinew, and your brow brass;
Isa 48:5 I have even from the beginning declared it to you; before it came to pass I showed it you: lest you should say, My idol has done them, and my graven image, and my molten image, has commanded them.

Isa 48:6 You have heard, see all this; and will not you declare/admit it? I have showed you new things from this time, even hidden things, and you did not know them. before I showed them
Isa 48:7 Now ( עַתָּה ) they have been brought into being ( נִבְרְאוּ , niphal perfective), and not ( וְלֹא ) from the beginning ( מֵאָז ), when I first thought of them, but before the day ( וְלִפְנֵי־יוֹם ) that they happened; and not ( וְלֹא ) you heeded them ( שְׁמַעְתָּם . qal perfective) when I told you of them, so that you are not saying ( פֶּן־תֹּאמַר , qal imperfective ), "Behold ( הִנֵּה ), I knew them ( יְדַעְתִּין׃ )".
48:7 עַתָּה נִבְרְאוּ וְלֹא מֵאָז וְלִפְנֵי־יוֹם וְלֹא שְׁמַעְתָּם פֶּן־תֹּאמַר הִנֵּה יְדַעְתִּין׃

Now they have been brought into being (niphal perfective). And they were not brought into being immediately, but they were brought into being before the day they happened. And you did not heed them (qal perfective) when I announced them, so that you cannot now be saying (qal imperfective), "Behold, I knew them, that they would happen."

Things God has thought of doing to demonstrate His sovereign power, He announces in advance. But He delays the fulfilment, so that men end up denying they will happen. Then they happen, and because men have already denied they would happen, they cannot, after they happen, say "We already knew they would happen." Hence God is proven true and men have to admit God has indeed brought to pass what He said He would bring to pass.
Or it could simply mean that God knew in eternity [past] exactly who He would save. And these would stand in sharp contrast to those whom God never knew in eternity (Mat 7:23).
 

lrs68

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2024
1,417
386
83
Now, your trying to tell us that God doesn't work providentially in his elect's lives? Was Noah Enoch's great, great grandaddy by accident or coincidence?

Furthermore, you have no idea what Noah learned (if anything at all) from Enoch. You're simply assuming.

Btw, how are you coming along with your investigation of the Chicken or Egg Syndrome in the Exodus account? Have you figured out who hardened who first?
Actually I was raised with the Oral traditions of Enoch, unlike the manuscript, more like how we read from Jesus, Disciples, Paul, Jude, John. Enoch was a big part of the Torah we had to learn and obvious so was Moshe [Moses in English].

We know in Creation the [parent, or stage of procreating] is clearly evident throughout the first 2 Chapters of Genesis. So I will stick with God allowed Pharaoh to harden his heart before God made it permanent...hence I choose the Chicken over the Egg.
 

lrs68

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2024
1,417
386
83
From whom did the writers of Acts and the Epistles receive their revelation?
Luke wrote what Paul preached and Paul penned the Letters. So Paul is the common denominator outside the obvious [Holy Spirit].

The fact is God made man with the ability to seek Him. Actually speaking here, God is forcing man to think about Him but man has the ability to reject God like Paul describes in Romans 1.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,582
751
113
So, God chose Adam AFTER Adam first chose God? Typical, convoluted, absurd, twisted, perverted FWT thinking! One would logically think that the logical order of things is that God chose Noah to be the recipient of saving knowledge of Himself solely by the power of His own grace.
Scripture that says God chose Adam?

I know God chose to create Adam, so it seems it would be pretty difficult for Adam to choose first.

Depends on your logic and your premise and as usual how the Word is being interpreted to establish that premise.

ESV Gen6:4-8 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown. 5 The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6 And the LORD regretted that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart. 7 So the LORD said, "I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land, man and animals and creeping things and birds of the heavens, for I am sorry that I have made them." 8 But Noah found favor/grace in the eyes of the LORD.

The context of grace in this section of Scripture is Noah (a righteous man - blameless/complete man - walking with God Gen6:9 - who in faith built the ark as God commanded Heb11:7) being saved from the flood. So, I guess we could say that a righteous, complete man walking with God was saved [from the destroying flood - God's wrath] by grace through faith. This saved from wrath concept is one of the main points Paul is making in Romans.

God electing Noah or bringing him to faith is not discussed here. A believer is saved from wrath by grace.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
4,340
728
113
I am saying that Paul said God made man with the ability to seek Him. So man can do as God made him able to do or what Paul said is a lie.
He gives the knowledge of Himself in the earthly, temporal, sense, but does not give spiritual DISCERNMENT to everyone, only to His elect upon becoming born again.

[1Co 2:14 KJV] 14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.
 

lrs68

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2024
1,417
386
83
He gives the knowledge of Himself in the earthly, temporal, sense, but does not give spiritual DISCERNMENT to everyone, only to His elect upon becoming born again.

[1Co 2:14 KJV] 14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.
Amen!
I agree 100%
 

lrs68

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2024
1,417
386
83
Hmmm, okay, that's good to hear but seems to contradict your prior post.
You posted that God gives ways to have knowledge of Him and that matches Acts 17 that God made man with the ability to seek Him.

Man's created ability to seek God is through God giving knowledge of Himself. He did it through Creation and at Creation like Romans 1 claims.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
4,340
728
113
You posted that God gives ways to have knowledge of Him and that matches Acts 17 that God made man with the ability to seek Him.

Man's created ability to seek God is through God giving knowledge of Himself. He did it through Creation and at Creation like Romans 1 claims.
But not spiritually, earthly - from the earthly, the spiritual cannot be found.
 
Jul 3, 2015
64,802
33,006
113
You posted that God gives ways to have knowledge of Him and that matches Acts 17 that God made man with the ability to seek Him.

Man's created ability to seek God is through God giving knowledge of Himself. He did it through Creation and at Creation like Romans 1 claims.
God's Word says He knows none are seeking Him.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,582
751
113
But it's also written that all that the Father gives to the Son WILL [effectively] come to Him and that all that come to him
When does He give men to His Son, and who are they - men who have believed or unbelievers? Again, those who hear and learn and believe come to Him. I actually think there may be some important detail in part in this language from John6 in regard to God choosing and it in part may be seen in 2Thes2:13 (next comment), but it's just a theory I've been working with for some time.

"Hearing, learning and believing" are all part of the sanctification-birthing process of salvation (2Thes 2:13; 1Pet 1:2), which results in believing the Truth! Sanctification by the Spirit in the souls of God's elect even precedes their Justification (1Cor 6:11).
In 2Thes2:14 the call to 2Thes2:13 is the Gospel which I'd attach to the teaching by which God draws men to Christ per John6. The language in 2Thes2:13 is a good place to do some work (I'm starting with the YLT due to its translation of the preposition "en" which I'll highlight in bold):
  • YLT 2 Thessalonians 2:13 And we -- we ought to give thanks to God always for you, brethren, beloved by the Lord, that God did choose you from the beginning to salvation, in sanctification of the Spirit, and belief of the truth,
    • "choose" is not the usual word used for election, but in its parsing here it can mean to choose
    • God chose these Thes Christians "from the beginning"
      • Some take this back to your concept of election
      • Some take this back to the beginning of the Gentile salvation missions
    • God chose these Thes Christians from the beginning into/for salvation
      • in sanctification [of] Spirit and belief [of] truth
        • "in" can be translated many ways, one of which is "by means of" which I'm going to play out for now:
          • The means by which God chose the Thes Christians is sanctification [of] Spirit and belief [of] truth
            • So, these Thes Christians were:
              • Called through the Gospel (2:14)
              • Believed Truth
              • Sanctified [in] Spirit
      • The language here is not Sanctification by the Spirit that results in believing the Truth as you say
      • The language here may well be telling us how God chose - He chose them by His Spirit and their Belief in response to their [hearing] the Gospel.

You can take a stab at 1Pet1:2 if you'd like. I'd recommend you look at the online interlinear you've linked to a few times and first look at the Greek word order of where "elect" (adjective) is (the ESV looks to be sticking to word order), and then dealing with some of the nuances of the language as I did above.

There's really no sequence stated in 1Cor6:11. There's no difference in the verb structures and there are no temporal markers. We tend to like sequence but it's not always in the Greek as we want it to be.
 

lrs68

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2024
1,417
386
83
But not spiritually, earthly - from the earthly, the spiritual cannot be found.
Acts 17 is about naturally and not spiritually in reference to how God created man to seek Him.

It's merely a part of the human nature through Creation that draws man to seek God. The only way man becomes spiritually connected is through the Salvation obtained by the works done via Jesus Christ.