Random Questions; Bible-based answers

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I think you got to this discussion late. It started by me and Gwh disagreement on if trump is Christian. Calling musk to his side is proof on where his priorities are.

I'm confident in my discernments but they are only for today. Trump and musk could taste that heavenly gift tomorrow, and my discernment would change also.

And we all watch children suffer while we accumulate wealth. The difference is I'm forgiven and do a little bit less of it everyday.

The spirits person judges all things and is under no mans judgment . That means I do see musk for who he truly is today, and I'm under no obligation to entertain your opinion about that.

If I were of the world, I would probably support musk like you are.

But I'm not!

I still hope to view a recent video updating what Trump said in 2016, but I discerned a changed Trump giving God glory
after his ear was bloodied but his life was spared.
 
I think you got to this discussion late. It started by me and Gwh disagreement on if trump is Christian. Calling musk to his side is proof on where his priorities are.

I'm confident in my discernments but they are only for today. Trump and musk could taste that heavenly gift tomorrow, and my discernment would change also.

And we all watch children suffer while we accumulate wealth. The difference is I'm forgiven and do a little bit less of it everyday.

The spirits person judges all things and is under no mans judgment . That means I do see musk for who he truly is today, and I'm under no obligation to entertain your opinion about that.

If I were of the world, I would probably support musk like you are.

But I'm not!
The way they treat women, I doubt they have God-fearing in them.
 
Although we accept Jesus as Lord, perfect surrender/giving/living will not be attained in this life Phil. 3:12),
and when resurrected, believers will gain everything (Rom. 8:22-25).

It's not about perfection, just a genuine surrendered life that grows like a tree. You can't see the growth daily, but over time it's seen.
 
I still hope to view a recent video updating what Trump said in 2016, but I discerned a changed Trump giving God glory
after his ear was bloodied but his life was spared.
What about musk GWH, how are you seeing him?
 
I think you got to this discussion late. It started by me and Gwh disagreement on if trump is Christian. Calling musk to his side is proof on where his priorities are.

I'm confident in my discernments but they are only for today. Trump and musk could taste that heavenly gift tomorrow, and my discernment would change also.

And we all watch children suffer while we accumulate wealth. The difference is I'm forgiven and do a little bit less of it everyday.

The spirits person judges all things and is under no mans judgment . That means I do see musk for who he truly is today, and I'm under no obligation to entertain your opinion about that.

If I were of the world, I would probably support musk like you are.

But I'm not!

Yes, I read back through the comments first. What I'm getting from you is that anyone who disagrees must be "of the world". Yes, yes, you caught us. We're all ignorant heathens. :rolleyes:

No, I don't consider Musk or Trump to be Christian, but that doesn't erase the positive things they've done. I'm very aware of the negatives, as well.

Bottom line and the reason for my first post: If you're going to proclaim "Hate, slander, those things don't reside in me" as you proceed to literally slander someone, don't be surprised when the obvious hypocrisy gets called out.
 
Question #1: Are there other earths with human life on them?

My answer: I doubt it, although I have seen people say there must be, because there are so many billions of suns in the universe, but I do not understand how one could arrive at an estimate of probability from a known case of only one--US!

Your answer?...
So far I can't say there are. Right now there is no concrete proof but I don't know everything I can't say yes or no
 
Yes, I read back through the comments first. What I'm getting from you is that anyone who disagrees must be "of the world". Yes, yes, you caught us. We're all ignorant heathens. :rolleyes:

No, I don't consider Musk or Trump to be Christian, but that doesn't erase the positive things they've done. I'm very aware of the negatives, as well.

Bottom line and the reason for my first post: If you're going to proclaim "Hate, slander, those things don't reside in me" as you proceed to literally slander someone, don't be surprised when the obvious hypocrisy gets called out.

If I were of the world you'd be correct,
But I'm not.
 
Yes, I read back through the comments first. What I'm getting from you is that anyone who disagrees must be "of the world". Yes, yes, you caught us. We're all ignorant heathens. :rolleyes:

No, I don't consider Musk or Trump to be Christian, but that doesn't erase the positive things they've done. I'm very aware of the negatives, as well.

Bottom line and the reason for my first post: If you're going to proclaim "Hate, slander, those things don't reside in me" as you proceed to literally slander someone, don't be surprised when the obvious hypocrisy gets called out.

Well Citizen, you've stepped up to the plate, may I ask you some questions to get a measurement of your faith?

Assuming your okay with that, what is your understanding of saving faith ?

The reason for this is by answering these questions, ill get a sense of were you are in the process, and if you are the spirits person yet. This would lend credence to take what your saying, and i would listen more intently.

Grace through faith, how do you in your own words, understand "through faith ".
 
A random Question?

Was Jesus born with a human nature?
Was that human nature pre fall or post fall.? Did Jesus have the fallen nature of Adam and 4000 years or the unfallen nature of Adam?

Rom 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
Phi 2:7 KJV But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.

This states that Jesus came in the likeness of sinful flesh. But was without sin.
 
The reason for this is by answering these questions, ill get a sense of were you are in the process, and if you are the spirits person yet. This would lend credence to take what your saying, and i would listen more intently.

Wow... just stop with the sideshow. You've already judged anyone who disagrees with you as being of the world, so you clearly have zero intention of listening. You are free to review any of my forum posts to continue with your judgement of my salvation.

You're deflecting away from the issue, which was you slandering someone while boasting slander doesn't reside in you. You chose to make statements and assumptions you absolutely cannot back up, and now you're choosing to run away from that fact. Focus and reflect upon that.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Lightbeamrider
Yes, I read back through the comments first. What I'm getting from you is that anyone who disagrees must be "of the world". Yes, yes, you caught us. We're all ignorant heathens. :rolleyes:

No, I don't consider Musk or Trump to be Christian, but that doesn't erase the positive things they've done. I'm very aware of the negatives, as well.

Bottom line and the reason for my first post: If you're going to proclaim "Hate, slander, those things don't reside in me" as you proceed to literally slander someone, don't be surprised when the obvious hypocrisy gets called out.

It seems you don't have a good grasp the Christians state of being.

In Christ, as per Rom. 7: 14-21, we are in a different state of being. That state of being is described by a military term in the Greek texts.

It describes 3 entities, God and the Holy Spirit, satan and his minions, and us. It describes God and satan in trench warfare over our souls, and we are merely onlookers with only the power to choose which one we surrender ourselves to.

This state of being is called sanctification, precisely, we are separated from our sinful nature's, to the point where Paul says, if I do what I do not want to do, it's not me doing it but indwelling in me doing it.

That is what I meant by hate and slander do not reside in me. Because of a continually surrendered life to Him, i am separated from doing those things, they don't abide, stay, reside in myself.

Where i went to far is just stating my opinion about things and people of the world. I usually don't do that, but GWH and I have been talking for months publicly and in private, and we have a good understanding of where each of us is at.

My discerning of trump and Musk is really just an observation of what is general public knowledge. And because I'm still "in" the world, I continually deal with thoughts of liking trump and Musk, and my leaning hard to the conservative side of things. But it all needs to be tempered with the truth, and the truth is not on their side at this point in time.

Looking forward to you reply about faith.
 
Wow... just stop with the sideshow. You've already judged anyone who disagrees with you as being of the world, so you clearly have zero intention of listening. You are free to review any of my forum posts to continue with your judgement of my salvation.

You're deflecting away from the issue, which was you slandering someone while boasting slander doesn't reside in you. You chose to make statements and assumptions you absolutely cannot back up, and now you're choosing to run away from that fact. Focus and reflect upon that.

You do know that non answer is an answer, right?
 
Wow... just stop with the sideshow. You've already judged anyone who disagrees with you as being of the world, so you clearly have zero intention of listening. You are free to review any of my forum posts to continue with your judgement of my salvation.

You're deflecting away from the issue, which was you slandering someone while boasting slander doesn't reside in you. You chose to make statements and assumptions you absolutely cannot back up, and now you're choosing to run away from that fact. Focus and reflect upon that.

It's literally a few sentences, should be the primary thought in your mind ready to be shared at a moments notice. This is that moment.
 
A random Question?

Was Jesus born with a human nature?
Was that human nature pre fall or post fall.? Did Jesus have the fallen nature of Adam and 4000 years or the unfallen nature of Adam?

Rom 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
Phi 2:7 KJV But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.

This states that Jesus came in the likeness of sinful flesh. But was without sin.

Excellent point! I had never considered it before, except that via the immaculate conception Jesus was born with clean genes.
 
Excellent point! I had never considered it before, except that via the immaculate conception Jesus was born with clean genes.

He was born 100% man and 100% God at all times all the time.

If what you never considered was did He ever have a sinful nature?

I think the answer is yes, but it was never consummated, never activated. Thus conquering sin.
 
He was born 100% man and 100% God at all times all the time.

If what you never considered was did He ever have a sinful nature?

I think the answer is yes, but it was never consummated, never activated. Thus conquering sin.

Yes, Jesus is the Lord incarnate: Insofar as God can be manifested in the human dimension, that person is Jesus.

What I had not considered was connecting Rom. 8:3 and Phil. 2:7 with Heb. 4:15, which is TOP #266: Jesus was tempted to sin,
but he did not sin or was made perfect
. [Heb. 4:15, 5:7-9, 7:26-28 & 10:14] Jesus learned submission or obedience to God the Father from what he suffered as God the Son, culminating in his crucifixion.

I will add those other verses soon.

I think these passages indicate that Jesus had the pre-fall human nature because of clean genes via the immaculate conception.
As created, Genesis says humans were very good, but not perfect, and Jesus perfected human nature by cooperating fully with the divine nature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Watchman22
He was born 100% man and 100% God at all times all the time.

If what you never considered was did He ever have a sinful nature?

I think the answer is yes, but it was never consummated, never activated. Thus conquering sin.
Yes I agree 100% man and 100% God.

But I believe the understanding of sin has been twisted. It is not a sin to be tempted. JESUS WAS TEMPTED.
when temptation is given into it becomes sin. JESUS NEVER SINNED

But Jesus was tempted in all points like us yet without sin.

For Jesus to come and be protected from temptation and not have a sinful nature like us, then how could He say He was tempted like us.

Follow the genes of Mary and you will find sinful people in that line. The teaching that Mary was sinless is a catholic doctrine, based on sin being inherited. Or based on people being a sinner before they are even born. Which is false.

Sin is a choice not something we are born with. A sinful nature does not automatically make us a sinner.
 
Yes I agree 100% man and 100% God.

But I believe the understanding of sin has been twisted. It is not a sin to be tempted. JESUS WAS TEMPTED.
when temptation is given into it becomes sin. JESUS NEVER SINNED

But Jesus was tempted in all points like us yet without sin.

For Jesus to come and be protected from temptation and not have a sinful nature like us, then how could He say He was tempted like us.

Follow the genes of Mary and you will find sinful people in that line. The teaching that Mary was sinless is a catholic doctrine, based on sin being inherited. Or based on people being a sinner before they are even born. Which is false.

Sin is a choice not something we are born with. A sinful nature does not automatically make us a sinner.

I agree that sin does not occur until a person chooses to succumb to temptation.

Not interested in the genes of Mary, because I believe the Holy Spirit created an ovum from nothing in her womb.