Reconciled to God while enemies !

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
No conditions to be reconciled !

Not all men are reconciled to God by Christ's death while being enemies, and thats simply because Christ's death was not for everyone without exception. That's why some are reconciled to God while being enemies and unbelievers Rom 5:10 and why some are under Gods wrath and condemnation while being enemies and unbelievers Jn 3:18,36 !

There is simply only one explanation for this, Christ died for some who are enemies and unbelievers and did not die for others who are enemies and unbelievers !

The enemies and unbelievers that Christ died for are reconciled to God by it, did not perform any conditions whatsoever, because they were actively enemies and unbelievers, So Christ fulfilled all the conditions necessary for them to be reconciled to God while being enemies and unbelievers ! 13
 
  • Like
Reactions: rogerg
brightfame52 said:
No conditions to be reconciled !

Not all men are reconciled to God by Christ's death while being enemies, and thats simply because Christ's death was not for everyone without exception. That's why some are reconciled to God while being enemies and unbelievers Rom 5:10 and why some are under Gods wrath and condemnation while being enemies and unbelievers Jn 3:18,36 !

There is simply only one explanation for this, Christ died for some who are enemies and unbelievers and did not die for others who are enemies and unbelievers !

The enemies and unbelievers that Christ died for are reconciled to God by it, did not perform any conditions whatsoever, because they were actively enemies and unbelievers, So Christ fulfilled all the conditions necessary for them to be reconciled to God while being enemies and unbelievers ! 13
Click to expand...
Romans 5:10 teaches that reconciliation was secured “by the death of His Son” while we were enemies, but John 3:18–36 teaches that unbelievers — including the elect before conversion — are under wrath until they believe. These are two separate classes are they not?
one reconciled and one condemned?
 
OMC said:
Romans 5:10 teaches that reconciliation was secured “by the death of His Son” while we were enemies, but John 3:18–36 teaches that unbelievers — including the elect before conversion — are under wrath until they believe. These are two separate classes are they not?
one reconciled and one condemned?
Click to expand...
"OMC,

You are fundamentally failing to distinguish between Nature and Covenant, and you are completely confusing the court of God (in foro Dei) with the court of human conscience (in foro conscientiae


).
When you quote Ephesians 2:3 to prove the elect are 'children of wrath' before conversion, you miss the vital word the Apostle uses: 'by nature' (φύσει).
  • By Nature (Our Experiential Reality): The elect are born in Adam, inherently corrupt, spiritually blind, and walking in a state that deserves wrath. In our experience, and under the Law of Works, we are completely ruined. Until the Holy Spirit gives us faith, our conscience rightfully condemns us.
  • By Covenant (Our Legal Reality): We are preserved in Christ, loved with an everlasting love, and our entire legal debt was permanently extinguished by our Surety in 33 AD (The Legal Phase).
They are not two separate classes of people. They are the same people running from God in their fallen nature, while completely secured and legally reconciled by God in His sovereign covenant.

By claiming that the elect are under outstanding judicial liability in the sight of God right up until the moment they believe, you force God into an absolute violation of His unchangeability. You are forcing a timeline where, the exact second a sinner has faith, God's internal mind, decree, and emotional state must completely flip from judicial hatred to judicial love based on a temporal human act. You have a mutating God who reacts to human timelines. But Malachi 3:6 says, 'I am the Lord, I change not.'

As John Gill masterfully explains, faith does not create our justification or procure our reconciliation; faith is the eye given to a blind sinner so he can look up and see the courtroom ledger that Christ already cleared 2,000 years ago while we were still enemies (Romans 5:10). Faith is the manifestation of the verdict to our conscience, not the trigger for the verdict in heaven.

Stop dividing the unified purpose of the Trinity. The cross was a finished, self-executing satisfaction, not a provisional framework waiting for a human signature. Answer the legal question: If Christ perfectly satisfied the law for the elect in 33 AD, how can God justly hold an outstanding judicial liability against them for those same sins for a single second after Calvary? You cannot have a satisfied debt and an outstanding liability at the same time. That is double jeopardy, and the high court of heaven does not practice it."

 
brightfame52 said:
"OMC,

You are fundamentally failing to distinguish between Nature and Covenant, and you are completely confusing the court of God (in foro Dei) with the court of human conscience (in foro conscientiae


).
When you quote Ephesians 2:3 to prove the elect are 'children of wrath' before conversion, you miss the vital word the Apostle uses: 'by nature' (φύσει).
  • By Nature (Our Experiential Reality): The elect are born in Adam, inherently corrupt, spiritually blind, and walking in a state that deserves wrath. In our experience, and under the Law of Works, we are completely ruined. Until the Holy Spirit gives us faith, our conscience rightfully condemns us.
  • By Covenant (Our Legal Reality): We are preserved in Christ, loved with an everlasting love, and our entire legal debt was permanently extinguished by our Surety in 33 AD (The Legal Phase).
They are not two separate classes of people. They are the same people running from God in their fallen nature, while completely secured and legally reconciled by God in His sovereign covenant.

By claiming that the elect are under outstanding judicial liability in the sight of God right up until the moment they believe, you force God into an absolute violation of His unchangeability. You are forcing a timeline where, the exact second a sinner has faith, God's internal mind, decree, and emotional state must completely flip from judicial hatred to judicial love based on a temporal human act. You have a mutating God who reacts to human timelines. But Malachi 3:6 says, 'I am the Lord, I change not.'

As John Gill masterfully explains, faith does not create our justification or procure our reconciliation; faith is the eye given to a blind sinner so he can look up and see the courtroom ledger that Christ already cleared 2,000 years ago while we were still enemies (Romans 5:10). Faith is the manifestation of the verdict to our conscience, not the trigger for the verdict in heaven.

Stop dividing the unified purpose of the Trinity. The cross was a finished, self-executing satisfaction, not a provisional framework waiting for a human signature. Answer the legal question: If Christ perfectly satisfied the law for the elect in 33 AD, how can God justly hold an outstanding judicial liability against them for those same sins for a single second after Calvary? You cannot have a satisfied debt and an outstanding liability at the same time. That is double jeopardy, and the high court of heaven does not practice it."

Click to expand...
You’re trying to solve a tension Scripture never creates.
When Paul says the elect were “children of wrath” by nature (Ephesians 2:3), he is describing our experiential condition in Adam — corrupt, blind, guilty, and rightly condemned in the court of conscience (in foro conscientiae).
But that experiential reality does not cancel the covenantal reality that, in Christ, our legal debt was extinguished at the cross and our reconciliation was accomplished before we ever believed.
The mistake you’re making is treating Nature and Covenant as if they were competing truths, when Scripture treats them as parallel truths about the same people.
"These are two separate classes are they not?
one reconciled and one condemned?"
Same people different classes. You twisted what I asked.
By nature, I was ruined and deserved wrath; by covenant, I was loved with an everlasting love and secured by my Surety.
These are not two classes of people — they are one people seen in two courts: my conscience condemns me until faith, but God’s covenant has already secured me in Christ.
When you confuse those courts, you end up denying either the depth of human ruin or the completeness of Christ’s legal work. Scripture affirms both without contradiction.**
 
OMC said:
You’re trying to solve a tension Scripture never creates.
When Paul says the elect were “children of wrath” by nature (Ephesians 2:3), he is describing our experiential condition in Adam — corrupt, blind, guilty, and rightly condemned in the court of conscience (in foro conscientiae).
But that experiential reality does not cancel the covenantal reality that, in Christ, our legal debt was extinguished at the cross and our reconciliation was accomplished before we ever believed.
The mistake you’re making is treating Nature and Covenant as if they were competing truths, when Scripture treats them as parallel truths about the same people.
"These are two separate classes are they not?
one reconciled and one condemned?"
Same people different classes. You twisted what I asked.
By nature, I was ruined and deserved wrath; by covenant, I was loved with an everlasting love and secured by my Surety.
These are not two classes of people — they are one people seen in two courts: my conscience condemns me until faith, but God’s covenant has already secured me in Christ.
When you confuse those courts, you end up denying either the depth of human ruin or the completeness of Christ’s legal work. Scripture affirms both without contradiction.**
Click to expand...
"OMC,

This is absolutely magnificent. You have just completely surrendered your entire position, adopted my exact High Calvinist distinctions word-for-word, and you are now desperately trying to pretend that this was your view all along!


Let’s look at the absolute theological whiplash you just gave yourself in a single paragraph:
  • Your first sentence: 'Same people different classes.'
  • Your fifth sentence: 'These are not two classes of people — they are one people seen in two courts.'
You are so frantic to escape the corner I backed you into that you are literally contradicting your own sentences four lines apart!
But more importantly, look at what you just confessed. You explicitly wrote: 'In Christ, our legal debt was extinguished at the cross and our reconciliation was accomplished before we ever believed... by covenant, I was loved with an everlasting love and secured by my Surety.'

Thank you for completely conceding The Legal Phase of Eternal Justification!
By admitting that the legal debt was extinguished at the cross and that you were secured by the Surety before you ever believed, you have completely abandoned your old conditional framework. You can no longer claim that faith is the legal trigger or the threshold of justification. If the debt was extinguished in 33 AD, the ledger in the high court of heaven (in foro Dei) was completely clear.
You have fully agreed with my point:
  1. At the Cross (33 AD): Legal acquittal was achieved, debt was extinguished, and the elect were covenantally secured. There was zero outstanding judicial liability remaining against them in the court of God.
  2. At Conversion: The Holy Spirit brings the manifestative knowledge of that finished acquittal to the court of human conscience (in foro conscientiae). Faith receives the news of a debt that was already extinguished 2,000 years prior.
You spent the last several rounds arguing that the cross was just 'legally sufficient' but not 'judicially applied' until faith. You argued that before faith, the elect were under real courtroom damnatory judgment. But the moment you admitted that the debt was extinguished and secured by the Surety before faith, you admitted that God held no outstanding legal liability against them.
Welcome to High Calvinism, OMC. You have officially affirmed John Gill’s doctrine of Eternal Justification. You have acknowledged that we are one people seen in two courts, and that faith is the non-causal manifestation of an eternity-settled verdict.

Next time, save yourself the trouble of fighting the finished work of Christ for three rounds just to copy and paste my own argument back to me as your defense. The cross was a finished execution, the court of heaven was satisfied, and the debt is gone. Soli Deo Gloria!"

 
brightfame52 said:
"OMC,

This is absolutely magnificent. You have just completely surrendered your entire position, adopted my exact High Calvinist distinctions word-for-word, and you are now desperately trying to pretend that this was your view all along!


Let’s look at the absolute theological whiplash you just gave yourself in a single paragraph:
  • Your first sentence: 'Same people different classes.'
  • Your fifth sentence: 'These are not two classes of people — they are one people seen in two courts.'
You are so frantic to escape the corner I backed you into that you are literally contradicting your own sentences four lines apart!
But more importantly, look at what you just confessed. You explicitly wrote: 'In Christ, our legal debt was extinguished at the cross and our reconciliation was accomplished before we ever believed... by covenant, I was loved with an everlasting love and secured by my Surety.'

Thank you for completely conceding The Legal Phase of Eternal Justification!
By admitting that the legal debt was extinguished at the cross and that you were secured by the Surety before you ever believed, you have completely abandoned your old conditional framework. You can no longer claim that faith is the legal trigger or the threshold of justification. If the debt was extinguished in 33 AD, the ledger in the high court of heaven (in foro Dei) was completely clear.
You have fully agreed with my point:
  1. At the Cross (33 AD): Legal acquittal was achieved, debt was extinguished, and the elect were covenantally secured. There was zero outstanding judicial liability remaining against them in the court of God.
  2. At Conversion: The Holy Spirit brings the manifestative knowledge of that finished acquittal to the court of human conscience (in foro conscientiae). Faith receives the news of a debt that was already extinguished 2,000 years prior.
You spent the last several rounds arguing that the cross was just 'legally sufficient' but not 'judicially applied' until faith. You argued that before faith, the elect were under real courtroom damnatory judgment. But the moment you admitted that the debt was extinguished and secured by the Surety before faith, you admitted that God held no outstanding legal liability against them.
Welcome to High Calvinism, OMC. You have officially affirmed John Gill’s doctrine of Eternal Justification. You have acknowledged that we are one people seen in two courts, and that faith is the non-causal manifestation of an eternity-settled verdict.

Next time, save yourself the trouble of fighting the finished work of Christ for three rounds just to copy and paste my own argument back to me as your defense. The cross was a finished execution, the court of heaven was satisfied, and the debt is gone. Soli Deo Gloria!"

Click to expand...
Pay Attention...
You’re treating two different categories as if they were the same thing:

Descriptive language about how the elect appear in different contexts vs.
Ontological classes of humanity.
When I said: “Same people, different classes.”
I was describing functional categories (how they appear under law vs. under grace), not metaphysical classes of humanity.

When I later said: “These are not two classes of people — they are one people seen in two courts.”
I was clarifying the ontological unity of the elect while acknowledging forensic duality (heaven’s court vs. conscience’s court).

Those two statements are not contradictory.
They are describing two different axes of the same reality.

You collapsed them into one axis, then declared victory over a contradiction you manufactured.
 
Reconciliation by Christs death is not just unilateral !

The terrible mistake of false religion is to believe and teach that Christs death is only unilateral in its effect, but that is a grave
mistake. You see, that makes the death of Christ falling short of reconciling , bringing man to God, which the scripture teaches that it does. Peter writes of the death of Christ this fact 1 Pet 3:18

18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:

See, His suffering for our sins was for the purpose of bringing us to God ! He by it, leads us to God. It also :


  1. to render one acceptable to God

    It does that which God told cain that if he did well he would be accepted Gen 4:7

    7 If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted?


    Well Christ death, for all whom He suffered and died for causes them to be accepted of God, without them doing anything !

    Christ's reconciling death will also cause us to come to God in being saved to the uttermost Heb 7:25

    25 Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.

    Notice " them that come to God BY HIM ! Meaning His reconciling work which brings them to God 1 Pet 3:18 !

    Paul writes also Col 1: 21,22a

    21 And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled. How ?

    22a 22 In the body of his flesh through death,

    So those who teach that Christ's death effected only a unilateral reconciliation, they teach lies, they teach ignorantly, and do Christ's death accomplishment a disservice ! 13
 
Received into His Favor !

Those sinners Christ died for, by His Death alone having been applied to their account, even while being enemies/unbelievers [by nature Eph 2:2-3], nevertheless they have been received into His Divine Favor, having been reconciled by His Sons Death for them Rom 5:10

10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

Paul writing to believers states that when they were unbelievers/enemies they were [had been] reconciled to God, not by believing, but by the Death of Gods Son. Now that word reconciled is the greek word katallassó and one of its meanings is:

to return into favor with, be reconciled to, , to receive one into his favor.

This is what Christ's Death for them alone accomplished, it put those Christ, the Son of God, died for, it put them into Gods Favor, the Psalmist wrote Ps 30:5

For his anger endureth but a moment; in his favour is life: weeping may endure for a night, but joy cometh in the morning.

Now how can sinners in a state of being unbelievers/enemies still be reconciled to God, and received into His Divine Favor ? Its because of what Christ's Death done before Gods Law and Justice ! 14
 
Received into His favor 2

When sinners are reconciled to God while they are enemies by Christ death Rom 5:10, they have been received into Gods divine favor. Now this can only be possible if their sins have already been put away and they're remembered no more Heb 8:12

For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.

This is also them whom God will not charge or impute sin 2 Cor 5:19 and Rom 4:8

So them that have been reconciled to God while they are enemies and unbelievers have no sin charged against them , or they could not have been reconciled into Gods divine favor.
 
It presents us , those he died for, holy, and unblameable and unreprovable in his sight.

That is the True result of being reconciled to God by Christ death while being enemies Rom 5:10, Col 1:21-22

21 And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled

22 In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:

This result comes through His Death, not by Faith, for vs 22a makes that clear.14
 
Being reconciled by Christ death while being enemies Rom 5:10 coincides with being made righteous with Christ death while being enemies Rom 5:19! We can be reconciled to a Holy God only if He views and accepts, reckons us righteous!

And since the sacred testimony is that believers had been reconciled to God by Christ death while being enemies, it's also true that they were declared righteous before God by Christ death while they were being enemies! 14
 
Those who are reconciled to God while they are being enemies
Per Rom5:10, are also Justified before God at the same while being enemies, because Gods Justice
Shall not charge them with sin, hence Justified from all their sins while unbelieving enemies.
 
The Mystery of Reconciliation !

Rom 5:10

10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

This blessed reconciliation by Christ's death is a Mystery unto the carnal mind, it cannot be received by it, hence confirming the writing of Paul 1 Cor 2:14

14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

The natural man is simply the person who has not been born again, or born from above Jn 3:3

3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

You see, the Mystery of Reconciliation, by the Death of Christ, reveals to the saved, that even while they are being enemies, they had been reconciled to God, put into a right relationship with Him !

They were at one ment with God ! In fact, to be reconciled to God is at one ment, from the word atonement as its mentioned in Vs 11 Rom 5:10-11

10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement.

That word atonement is reconciliation, and so when sinners Christ died for are still enemies by nature, children of wrath as others Eph 2:2-3 they are nevertheless in an reconciled at one ment relationship with God, while all others are under His just condemnation and wrath Jn 3:18,36.

This the natural mind of man cannot fathom, or appreciate, in fact its absolute foolishness to him ! 15
 
The Mystery of Reconciliation !2

Another thing about reconciliation that is an Mystery to the natural man and foolishness, is this, those reconciled to God while being enemies Rom 5:10 , dont have their sins imputed to them as other people do . Check this out 2 Cor 5:19

19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.

See , reconciliation means that the reconciled do not have their sins imputed or charged to them, a whole world of people, jews and gentiles. All the sins the reconciled commit, from birth to the grave, can never be imputed to them. Its not even possible for those reconciled to God to ever die in their sins !15
 
The Mystery of Reconciliation !3

Another Mystery of Reconciliation, even while the reconciled are being enemies Rom 5:10, and not having their sins charged to them 2 Cor 5:19, is the fact that they are counted righteous ! Yes, God hath imputed righteousness to them without works !

This is seen by scripture comparison. The reconciled dont have their sins imputed to them 2 Cor 5:19 and as such they are forgiven Ps 32:1-2

Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered.


2 Blessed is the man unto whom the Lord imputeth not iniquity, and in whose spirit there is no guile.

Pay attention to holy writ here. Transgression are forgiven, their sins are covered, when the Lord imputeth not iniquity Ps 32:2;2 Cor 5:19

Now pay close attention when Paul quotes David here in Rom 4, here goes Rom 4:6-8


6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,


7 Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.



8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.

,See that ? Even though Rom 4:6 isnt in the Ps 32 quote, nevertheless the Holy Spirit inspired Paul to write it here in Romans, when Paul goes back to David to quote Ps 32:1-2, showing therefore, that them blessed ones who dont have sin imputed to them, are forgiven as well as have Righteousness imputed them without works, without them doing anything, without any action from them whatsoever !

So the reconciled are righteous !

So, technically speaking, the world of 2 Cor 5:19 is a Righteous world or the world of 2 Cor 5:19 is a reconciled people who are righteous in the forensic sense.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back