Search results

If merely being in possession of a counterfeit bill is a criminal offense, or as you say indictable offense then the person would have already committed an offense by possessing the bill. In the US the criminal offense is the possession with the intent to defraud by passing the counterfeit...

Your response must be a result of the guilty until proven innocent mentality, so which one is it, there has to be evidence of criminal intent in order to charge a person or does the possession of a counterfeit bill constitute proof of criminal intent? Like I asked the other Canadian, how would...

I asked you before, how are you going to prove that you didn't know a bill in your possession is counterfeit and like other questions I have asked you, you simply ignore them. Here in the United States we have a principle of jurisprudence that all men are innocent until proven guilty. So...

Well, I do know that being in a possession of a counterfeit bill unknowingly is not criminal act in the U.S., which you appear so stiff-necked that you can't even give a reason (U.S. Code) as the basis for your erroneous claim that it is much less the reason for your antagonist participation in...

Based upon your claim to know that it is against the law for a person to be in possession of a counterfeit bill whether they knew it or not, then if you knew it before you said it then why don't you provide either the Minnesota or Federal statute which you claim to know that affirms what your...

The person who I was addressing didn't know Mr. Floyd's past when he called him a thief. You didn't know his record until you looked it up which begs the question, are you saying that you don't believe that a person's sins are washed away and they are a new creature when they accept Jesus...

It is not Africa that conducted the hearings regarding what American media reported as police brutality against blacks in the United States. It was the leaders of 54 African Nations who signed the letter following the death of George Floyd that was submitted to the United Nation Human Rights...

So I guess you think George Floyd actually passed a counterfeit $20 bill because, what was your reason for saying he was a thief? Because you believe that everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law? Oh ok, that makes sense. I thought for a second...

Maybe, do you believe in the right to own property? Do you believe people should keep their word? Except for those things it would be the perfect time, but the UN owns the property and building in NYC and then there is the issue of that treaty thing. Isn't the U.S. is bound by its own...

So she's Canadian, what's your point? If black Americans don't consider it a capital, or infamous crime to murder a black man then nothing is going to change until they do.

You don't even know the laws of your own Country, do you even have a clue how you could explain you didn't know it was counterfeit. Yeah likely story. :eek:

You know that we are a land of written laws, so can you one statute or law, Federal or State that remotely supports your argument that a person can not own a counterfeit bill? Much less affirms your claim the U.S. Constitution requires that a person has to prove their innocence in criminal...

That is true if the person knows it is a counterfeit bill and intends to use it as real money since if the person is knowingly in possession of a counterfeit obligation or security of the United States with the intent that the same be passed, published, or used as true and genuine, would be...

For he who comes to God must believe he is and is a rewarder of those who diligently seek him. (y)

Yes I can, when you say there is a price in the hand of a fool to get wisdom and then say "maybe now having the key to what this is, which is in the hand of a fool, we can search out why?" then is there a price in the hand of the fool to get understanding, or instruction? Maybe that is why...

***I should have noted that the Policy cited above was revised on 6/09/2020, the one cited above reflected the policy in effect at the time of the George Floyd incident.

If you can find it.

Of course, however the real tragedy is that US people have outsmarted ourselves with ignorance. Well, the trial of the Police Officer has been scheduled for August 17, 2057, then we will find out whether or not the Police Officer was negligent for non-compliance with the Mayor's directive on...

So do you believe that the Gospel is free?

That isn't my assertion, that is the State's closing argument. Since you assume that George Floyd had patronized the Cups Food store then there is no reason not to believe the 911 call that reported Floyd, however you might be jumping to conclusions if you think used a counterfeit $ 20 bill...