Search results

Rob Bowman has a complete set of Scriptural reasons for the subpoints of the Trinity doctrine here: http://bib.irr.org/biblical-basis-of-doctrine-of-trinity?fbclid=IwAR0BweVlg47hUE2XWq1YXRAfRgBJ1F_KupvTOtzrGdC-KiOk_lXfJ3IKevI There is one God. This one God is the single divine being known...

Rob Bowman has a complete set of Scriptural reasons for the subpoints of the Trinity doctrine here: http://bib.irr.org/biblical-basis-of-doctrine-of-trinity?fbclid=IwAR0BweVlg47hUE2XWq1YXRAfRgBJ1F_KupvTOtzrGdC-KiOk_lXfJ3IKevI There is one God. This one God is the single divine being known...

Rob Bowman has a complete set of Scriptural reasons for the subpoints of the Trinity doctrine here: http://bib.irr.org/biblical-basis-of-doctrine-of-trinity?fbclid=IwAR0BweVlg47hUE2XWq1YXRAfRgBJ1F_KupvTOtzrGdC-KiOk_lXfJ3IKevI There is one God. This one God is the single divine being known...

Rob Bowman has a complete set of these proofs on each of the points regarding the Trinity here: http://bib.irr.org/biblical-basis-of-doctrine-of-trinity?fbclid=IwAR0BweVlg47hUE2XWq1YXRAfRgBJ1F_KupvTOtzrGdC-KiOk_lXfJ3IKevI

Oneness theology is proven false by this analysis. VI. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit Are Each Someone Distinct from the Other Two (i.e., they are three “persons”) A. Matt. 28:19 1. “the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit”: use of definite article before each personal noun indicates...

There are a number of good Scriptures to cover the essence of the Trinity doctrine here: http://bib.irr.org/biblical-basis-of-doctrine-of-trinity?fbclid=IwAR0BweVlg47hUE2XWq1YXRAfRgBJ1F_KupvTOtzrGdC-KiOk_lXfJ3IKevI

The above is from this website by Rob Bowman called The Biblical Basis for the Trinity: http://bib.irr.org/biblical-basis-of-doctrine-of-trinity?fbclid=IwAR0BweVlg47hUE2XWq1YXRAfRgBJ1F_KupvTOtzrGdC-KiOk_lXfJ3IKevI

VI. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit Are Each Someone Distinct from the Other Two (i.e., they are three “persons”) A. Matt. 28:19 1. “the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit”: use of definite article before each personal noun indicates distinct persons unless explicitly stated otherwise...

No, I'm not wasting my time viewing the videos of cultists. And that is exactly what Oneness Pentecostalism is. If you want to summarize their arguments in text, I will ask a church history friend to look at them. He may have quick responses. He has already dismissed some of your claims...

Angela, you have formal training in Greek. I am wondering if you would care to break down the claim made here by biker: https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/does-oneness-theology-modalism-teach-a-sock-puppet-view-of-gods-nature.189684/page-16#post-4291277 It is laughable :D Never...

Note that this Oneness person affirmed the error of the other...therefore they are intentionally trying to deceive others. They are not worthy of consideration and are openly displaying their ignorance. Actually I think it goes more than ignorance and is an intentional attempt to deceive. And...

With is the translation of the word πρὸς πρὸς πρός, a preposition, equivalent to the epic προτί, from πρό and the adverbial suffix τί (cf. the German vor... bin (Curtius, § 381)); it is joined I. with the accusative, to, toward, Latin ad, denoting direction toward a thing, or position and state...

Keep sipping the Oneness Kool-Aid. Posting videos by Oneness guys with distorted facts proves nothing. I could post a bazillion Armstrongite videos (the cult I came from) and it wouldn't make the theology true.

I should have said it wouldn't make any difference to me whether the majority of PROFESSING believers were Oneness or not. I don't believe anti-Trinitarians are real believers. And, majority does not rule correct doctrine. Scripture does.

How in the world you believe Tertullian was a modalist is beyond me. He defended against Modalism. I suggest that you read Against Praxeus: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf03.v.ix.i.html?fbclid=IwAR3k0ORRxg8hH4T-FGi42wZCwOufiJgKC34eU-TnUUkDeg-yMQPVqpvXVM0

Additionally, my church history friend says this in regards to the Oneness view, after I explained my "sock puppet" analogy (which he did not like but I think it's accurate because the theology denies the possibility of interpersonal activity): Wouldn’t have thought of it like that, but I think...

I asked a friend of mine with a better knowledge of church history about your claims. He said: There have been bishops that held to problematic views historically. But his claim seems off, not only is he referring to a time prior to much trinitarian debate in the first place; but he’s...

By the way, it wouldn't matter if they were the majority of believers or not. According to you, the majority of believers are wrong and are following Rome in the Trinitarian doctrine. Suppose I said that the majority were Oneness Pentecostals. How would that prove anything, since you don't...

The Father and Son send the Holy Spirit. This is interpersonal activity. The Holy Spirit intercedes for the believer with the Father. Intercession is an interpersonal activity requiring three parties. By the way I already mentioned this. Regarding the Incarnation that is not an adequate...

Right. Are we to believe that Jesus engaged in unproductive behavior like babbling to himself? Why don't I find it surprising a Oneness Pentecostal would believe that?