Search results

you can call yourself whatever you like but the oneness doctrine does not hold to the Godhead nor the concept of the Trinity. also one accountable to what they have said. And the statement by I think PS is one of the oneness doctrines if you identify as one or not.

oneness

I agree chapter 13 is speaking of the mature believer operating in love and using the gifts for and in love. The main theme for chapter 13 of 1cor is Love not the removal of tongues lol or prophesying.

faith is not absent from doubt? what an unbiblical statement. it is God who gives to every man the measure of faith. You are suggesting One who has come to the saving knowledge of Christ can in some way be led to counterfeit faith? How foolish. The Holy Spirit remains in His unseen place...

the most important thing in context to this thread is the Context of 1cor chapter 12 to 14 are to seen as unit chapters. And the gifts of the Holy Spirit are not done away with nor has anyone proved any verses to show they are stopped or not for today.

same God spoke in gen 1

I would have no problem with those who say tongues is not for today IF they held that all the gifts of The Holy Spirit. Yet those who say the context of 1cor 13:10 "But when that which is perfect come, then that which is in part shall be done away." this does not mean when the bible was...

a very strange statement here: "I did not say we do not experience but rather it will not be confirmed until we receive our new incorruptible bodies, all saints die not receiving it. We have a living Hope that moves us towards the goal, a hope that surpasses human hope"

I know how this topic can lead to a foolish discussion concerning the concept of the " Trinity". As you know the word trinity is not in the bible it is a Theological term to describe what I believe is a Biblical concept. The error is the idea that you or I can fully understand the full...

this is constant false narrative and taking out of context " Jesus says its a "evil generation" as natural converted man does require a sign before they will exercise faith (coming from the experience)." this was written to those who would not believe unless you proved to them. IF you be...

what a self-righteous person you are. "Only if you have experienced the second birth." What an arrogant comment to make about people you do not even know. There has been sound Biblical doctrine provided. Apparently, you do not agree. You speak of sound doctrine yet you did not provide any...

again you don't know what Hebrew Old Testament word "Prophecy" is from New Testament Greek word "Prophesying".

you do not know the context of 1cor tongues or what you say or think is prophecy. Prophesying is not the same as prophecy. They are different in the Greek and the interpretation from Hebrew word in translated English for "Prophecy" is not the same meaning for Prophesying in Greek found in 1cor...

lol conducting your own huh? great I'm sure your finding will produce what you bais creates. Hey will you even use the word of God or is that not needed anymore for you?

the words " Spirit gave " means the ability to do, and then they spoke. yes, the circle of context does do that from the Point of where it is introduced. One verse mention in Isaiah 28 does not change the context of three chapters on the gifts of the Holy Spirit in 1cor 12-14 . And it does...

it is not known to man who the few are. it is what Jesus told man to do that is where we need to obey. Jesus said GO!

rational language that caused those in IS 28 to scoff and mock and in Acts 2 to as coff and mock. and have Paul write about in 1cor 14 .

modern tongues-speech is not a Biblical term nor is in the word of God you are using secular humanism to disprove your bias. and You are failing terribly

you use the term to support your humanistic approach to Biblical interpretation