Search results

Faith in building an ark today is not saving anyone. Faith in the blood of animals is not saving anyone.

Adam didn’t have what we have. He was not saved. The best outcome for Adam is to die and end up in the heart of the earth, safe from hell fire. That is not salvation as we know it today. Adam had no knowledge of the cross, the d,b,r of Jesus for sins.

Really? If all that I had was the book of Genesis, that would be enough for a man today to get saved? Leviticus? Job?

If you had only the knowledge of these men, would that be enough for salvation today? 1. Abraham 2. Moses 3. David 4. Disciple pre-resurrection

I hear you, but the disciples went around preaching the gospel of the kingdom. This gospel was specifically for Israel. It was not for Gentiles or Samaritans. Why? Because it is concerning their promised physical kingdom with their promised Messiah ruling on the throne of David.

Correct, it’s a reference to the devil and his ministers. It was kept a mystery in order for the crucifixion to occur. Therefore, the disciples didn’t know about the d,b,r of Jesus. Paul calls this his gospel.

He preached the good news that was only for Israel. The good news of the restoration of the kingdom of Israel and himself as their promised King.

Therefore, Jesus and the disciples did not preach the gospel of Jesus Christ as Paul preached. They preached the gospel of the kingdom.

I guess you would believe Paul is lying when he stated that what he preached was never made known before, but now it is made known.

Paul’s mystery that was revealed to him, my gospel, was kept secret since the world began. It was truth that had not been made known before it was revealed to Paul. Jesus and his disciples did not make it known. Romans 16:25 Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel...

Yes, at no time in scripture is the term “twelve tribes“ ever used as a reference to the body of Christ. To make it so in James 1:1 would violate every other usage in scripture.

And there would never had been a reason for the meeting of Acts 15.

If one has to ask the question, “what’s long?” then they already have a heart issue. Man always wants to push the envelope when it comes to obedience. And btw, what is acceptable to men, may not be acceptable to God.

Paul makes the statement which is not his opinion: 14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? Answer is rhetorical: yes

Scripture is clear. Nature is clear. It is a shame for a man to have long hair. And yes, the look is effeminate. Not calling you effeminate, but long hair on a man is effeminate. However, it is not a doctrinal issue that should divide believers. We have enough feminism amongst our male...

Paul is writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. These aren’t the opinions of men.

Whatever Paul preached...was not made known before him. It was a mystery up until Paul preached the message. But we all know what Paul preached.

I’m glad you corrected the word once again.🙄 The word is world. When the world as we know it ends with the Lord will come. Thats literally the context. The sign of thy coming. Matthew 24: 3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when...

God is not through with his physical people Israel. He has promised them a physical kingdom and he will deliver.

Wow! Good stuff. Thank you for this.