Search results

The nations will disarm and focus on spending their budgets and efforts on growing food. and social benefit of all, so as to eliminate persons going hungry and being homeless, suffering in that manner.

I am rejecting you misunderstandings of the scriptures, whenever you are wrong about them. It has nothing to do with my belief in the rapture/resurrection event. Isaiah 2:4 is talking about the timeframe of the 1000 year reign of Jesus on this present earth following His Return.

Shiohsfoal, Jason of Cyrene is an unknown. You are diverting, and are making false accusations of him being the basis for what I and other Christians believe. What Antiochus IV did is a matter of historical record. The time of the end verses in Daniel 11 begin with verse 36, with verse 35...

You wrote "by" the spirit. But the text of verse 29 says "in" the spirit, and "in the letter. "of the law" is implied. in the spirit of the law, and not in the letter of the law. As Paul is talking the law in verses 25, 26, 27. Paul was addressing the Jews standard for righteousness...

Has to do with what the text says, and recorded history. The actions of Antiochus IV are well known. Nothing to do with some unknown person Jason of Cyrene. You are diverting.

Obviously, Paul is a Christian. In those verses, Paul was speaking concerning of the Jews, to be a Jew inwardly, circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit of the law, not the letter of the law. Paul was addressing a problem the Jews had. Paul was expressing how the religious Jews...

Circumcision of the heart is something pertaining to the Jews when should they stray away from God and if they turn back to God....God with circumcise their heart... ...to love the LORD their God will all their heart, and all their soul (verse 6). It has to do with repentance. Deuteronomy 30...

I agree. The person who becomes the Antichrist by being anointed the King of Israel thought-to-be messiah has to be a Jew. A mosque is not a suitable place for the animal sacrifices to resume. There has to be a temple built of at least minim size to get the animal sacrifices going again as...

Daniel 11:31 is historic. It is talking about Antiochus IV.

Such terms apply to the children of Israel. i.e. the house of Israel and the house of Judah. I am neither. My relationship with God with that I am saved, am born again, by the Holy Spirit. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/search.php?q=new+covenant&bsec=&order=0&s=1

Y You did not answer Nehemiah 6's question to you in his post #33. What bible translation did you get your version of Luke 2:35 from ? Every bible verse I quote from is the kjv. "

When Jesus returns to this earth, the raptured/resurrected saints in their glorified incorruptible bodies will be returning with Him as the bride of Christ.

It is wise, if he is using the pulpit unwisely to present his theological wanderings in a negative manner. Show some timeline charts by the pastor of end times events leading up to the return of Jesus. What is his beliefs regarding the 7 year 70th week of Daniel 9 as still not yet fulfilled ?

My soul is at peace with God, my sins forgiven - saved - born again - by the shed blood of Jesus on the cross.

If the conclusion from the video were that there is no rapture - that would be another reason not to watch it. But the speaker does not mention the rapture, nor what you are creating in your mind - "the covenant of the sword" .

Not going to happen. It is a video by a theologian's wanderings through the bible. It accentuates negatives and is depressing to listen to. I don't recommend watching it.

There is no such thing as "the covenant of the sword". Reference the bible verses containing the 7 thunders and why those verses about the 7 thunders have anything to do with the content of this thread.

The title of the video "Why Jesus Came to Bring a Sword" contradicts why Jesus came - "I have come to save the world." Jesus saves by grace, the gift of God. The sword as Jesus used in "Believe not that I have come to bring peace, but a sword" represents the spiritual conflict that would...

What do you not understand about "on the day that Jesus returns" Jesus destroys the armies of the nations that have surrounded, occupy, Jerusalem and have taken half the city as hostages.