Search results

Thank you for the honesty. My honesty? Is it claimed wisdom by 'rightly dividing' to end-up rightly returning it to the whole message? But I do not anticipate an extremity, but a continuation of the ensample to proceed as you and I as "us". "It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us, , "...

Too Much? Right! We know, “our more presentable members have no need of it.”? (1 Corinthians 12:24) Again, I hope my point isn't overshot, thinking my focus is on man, or thereby perceiving me as “are ye not carnal, and walk as men”? It isn’t. Unlike those who overshoot thinking Caphas alone...

Well okay then, guess she is ready for the archives. I’ll close with this so the thread can step-aside and I can move about as time permits to other post. A last thought I like to drag into view before doing so. It has to do with something Paul said concerning our most fundamental stance...

Thanks! Surely, knowing the narrative of my OP-post, and what it is we hope to avoid from our thousands of specific denominational identities and dozens of generalized identities and among those a assortment of overly shameful reasonings, we have only ourselves to thank for this streaming...

Woe – Gentlemen – nice! If my perceptions are right, , The direction is established here! The pendulum is beginning to be restored here! Ohh-how much we need to get behind that clarion-call, , Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace. Ephesians 4:3 For we...

“, , solemnly charge them in the presence of God not to wrangle about words, which is useless and leads to the ruin of the hearers.” - NASB 2 Timothy 2:14 Good question! Well, there are other clues to direct us further. reject foolish and ignorant speculation - 2 Timothy 2:23 avoid foolish...

Eww, could be an observant eye there, thanks! Because I did spot an error of grammar Nowhere does the wording appear in 1 Corinthians 3:22 as I have it “All is yours”, but rather, “Everything is yours”, CSB “all things belong to you” NASB “All are yours”, KJV, NKJV, ASV, BLB Possibly others...

Ohh-well that’s perfectly okay, doesn’t mean I wouldn’t be very interested in hearing after you gave it some time to return comment! :)

Not sure if any here would want to know except possibly, the OPr lacked that deeper excavation many of us are fed from. But I have to say, standing back, , when we set all our cares “upon Him”, what then prevents our capability to say within, this struggle or that weakness isn’t being...

So kind to say, , everything God has for you, I hope to be a reality with you and yours, if that is, anything may be lacking! God bless! :)

Thank you so much! Actually as it turns out, a perceptive response. For back about 10-yrs ago when I embarked in on Christian forum discussion, that shyness kept me from being too vulnerable to a very large degree like for the next 4-or-5-yrs. Yes, its one thing to have the truth of not being...

Greetings friends! Grab a line or two if you care to remark, would love to hear your take! Per the suggestion of members from my post in the “New Members Introduce Yourself” section, I’m transferring that here for further evaluation and insight. Please feel free to bring up as you are so...

Hope all is okay for the OP author. Surely, an awkward report from our number stating some dithering version of “God, who is love made me unique to enjoy love, life and the company of others, isn’t that walking in love?” This is an extreme example, I know, , but I also know it is raging...

, , And a lovely word of encouragement! Thank you!

Thank you so much. A very nice place here! Well, you are right, far-far too wordy for an intro. The reason for such a post is on account of the username you see. But, my apologies to those who also think that was unnecessary, sorry, please forgive. I’ve decided to wait a while on transferring...

A lowly, Hi there! Is it too outdated to say, Greetings, God loves you!? My first-time commenting here, I am Mike and that s/n of choice; PAC-fit is what I have come to happily understand after decades of making my way through variable denominational bias. My explanation of that doesn’t...