Search results

And another one has earned my IGNORE list. I'm sorry that my coverage of God's written Word about the event of Christ's future coming AFTER the tribulation to gather His Church has offended you. That appears what you are after me about with trying to make false witness against me.

That's a wild accusation above. I have not interjected any such word into the text of God's Word. The phrase "caught up" is the English translation in the KJV Bible of the Greek word harpazo. The word 'rapture' comes from a Latin translation of that Greek word harpazo (NT:726) and 'rapture' is...

He asked what purpose Revelation was for, not about whether I understood it or not. I do not know whether he understood the Book, so I suggested that he study it. His line of questioning me had gone on for a few posts, which you apparently have not read. So you would be better off not making...

I see no Biblical evidence in your words, but only hate because you obviously feel that I have upset your comfortable apple cart. I'm not here to upset brethren, but that is... what God's Word will do to those who go against it. What you have yet to realize is that you are not directing your...

I don't care what you believe. What you were covering was related to the Amill position, and so that's the subject I responded to. If you didn't want to speak on Amill, then you should not have been suggesting their doctrine. And if you didn't know... you were suggesting their doctrine, then...

Well, you just contradicted yourself dear, because if he was only asking what I thought the 'purpose' of the Book of Revelation is, then that is NOT asking me about my understanding of it. Furthermore, whether or not I understand the Book of Revelation is not the subject of this Thread.

I suggest you go back to PennEd's post #51 and look again at the very top Heading with the column on the left claiming to be the rapture, and the column on the right claiming Christ's 2nd coming with no rapture. I'm not going to argue with you on your statements from the pre-trib rapture...

What you seem to be suggesting is that simple statements in The Bible don't actually mean what is said in simplicity. And I'm not talking about allegory, analogies, and parables that are written in God's Word; those things in all languages. I'm talking about simple statements that are easy to...

Your arguments are baseless, and all you are trying to do is attack one's credibility, and not discuss actual Bible Scripture pertaining to the subject of this Thread. Welcome to my IGNORE list.

Well, for those given to understand it, yeah. I know all of us will understand it when Lord Jesus returns. But for those who do understand, I see it as a gift from God, like that pastor once said to me when I asked him about it that, "no man showed that to me, God showed it to me", and he said...

Then you missed what he posted in his post #51, which is definitely ideas from the pre-trib rapture school. One of biggest clues on that list is right at the top too, with that idea that there is no 'catching away' at the 2nd coming. That is a specific doctrine of the pre-trib rapture fallacy...

I don't know what man you are listening to, but I recommend you actually study the Book of Revelation, otherwise you would not have to ask anyone what it is about.

You didn't have to 'claim' a position, as that's not what my conversation was about. I don't care what your position is. You could be of any denomination. So what I said assumed nothing, except that you were defending the Amill position. Now if you were not, then I have to assume that you came...

And what Church is that, one that joins their old African pagan blood rituals in with Christian doctrines? That kind of thing is happening with new converts in those lands too. And when the coming false-Messiah shows up in our near future, working great signs and wonders to deceive the whole...

All I can say to that, is what God said long ago... Isa 2:22 22 Cease ye from man, whose breath is in his nostrils: for wherein is he to be accounted of? KJV Heeding what men's doctrines say is not the same thing as what God's says in His Word. Matt 24:29-31 29 Immediately after the...

I really don't know what you're on about, but it suggests very un-Biblical ideas. The Book of Revelation given by Christ to John was given to the Churches about the latter days. The parallel Bible Book that covers many of the same subjects is the Book of Genesis, not Deuteronomy.

The simple matter is that Jesus' 1st coming was meek as a lamb to sacrifice Himself upon the cross, not to reign over all nations just yet, for that is about His future 2nd coming. His Kingdom that is here today on earth is only by His Church through The Spirit. And His Church is not simply a...

I have to disagree with that idea that Christianity is growing progressively today. It's actually at a stage today where many are leaving the Church, as attendance in the West is down. And per God's Word about the end of this world, we have been forewarned that the end will be a time when some...

I only offer criticism to doctrines of men that go against God's written Word, which the Amill position definitely does. One of the biggest clues that the Amill position is false is the fact that if today were already Christ's Kingdom to come on earth, then why is Jesus not here de facto on...

Many on man's Amill position try that ploy often, trying to link the Premill position with Darby's false Dispensationalism and a pre-trib rapture theory. The Bible position is Premill, that Jesus' future return and His Kingdom will be literally established upon this earth, and at that time...