Search results

The NKJV is a transition Trojan horse Bible. It is the first popular Modern Bible that attempts to sway KJV believers to switch to a Critical Text Modern bible. It has used stealth and deceptive tactics and marketing to pull this off. They make the reader believe the NKJV is based on the same...

From my understanding on Heisler’s view here, he believes that the “sons of God” are divine beings as a part of some kind of divine council mentioned in Genesis 1 (who govern things in the universe — although they do not create things in our reality like God has done). Yet, Heisler believes...

If you look closely at Job 1:6, it provides strong evidence that the "sons of God" are indeed angels. The verse says: "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them." (Job 1:6). In this passage, the "sons of God" are clearly...

So then, if your right, which Bible verse tells you it was Jesus in the fire? My Bible (the KJV) tells me straight out flat it was the Son of God in the fire with Daniel's three friends. What does your Bible say that would clearly lead you to that conclusion? ...

So now we are basing the faith off our own subjective feelings, thoughts, and or popular beliefs instead of the Bible? The point here is where do you get understanding of the knowledge of the things of God? Its by the Bible. Faith comes by hearing, and hearing the Word of God (Romans 10:17)...

Contextually, this is not an anachronism. Job 38:7 tells us that “sons of God” are angels. King Nebuchadnezzar calls the fourth in the fire, “the form of the fourth is like the Son of God.” (Daniel 3:25). So Nebuchadnezzar is saying the fourth is like the angel of God. This is exactly what...

When somebody tells you they have 150 Reasons for something, I think the information they provide deserves a look. I provided several links to certain posts on this forum revealing changed doctrine for the worse in Modern Bibles when compared to the KJV. So while others may make the claim that...

Did you carefully look at the points I made on each of those links? ....

Uh, no. King Nebuchadnezzar admitted in context the following words. "Blessed be the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, who hath sent his angel, and delivered his servants that trusted in him,..." (Daniel 3:28). This truth is expressed even in Modern Bibles. ...

Yes, from my perspective, its kind obvious the parables teach doctrine. There are a lot of great nuggets and lessons to learn from them to the glory of Jesus Christ. But I would disagree with you that the NIV is a good thing for English speakers unless one does not care about precise truth or...

Did you look at the links of the changed doctrines I provided? Not sure how you can praise the NIV as a trustworthy translation after reading what I posted. If that’s not enough, I got more. ….

Unlike my fellow KJV brother here, I believe parables teach doctrine. Yet, I also believe that the KJV being the perfect Word of God for today is a revelation from God that is revealed by reading the Scriptures (if one is open to such a truth). ....

In addition, in Acts 13:33, translations like the NIV, NLT, BSB, and CSB imply that God the Father became Jesus' Father at some point in time, suggesting that Jesus only became God's Son during the incarnation. However, this is incorrect because Scripture clearly shows the Father sent His Son...

First, the Modern Bibles say the same thing as the KJV in Job 3:11. Just go to Biblehub.com on this verse and you will see it. The ESV says the same thing using different words (among others). Second, Job was wishing of the possibility that he could have died while in the womb or shortly...

As for the readability issue involving the King James Bible: I don't believe this is a good argument against the KJV being the pure Word of God for today. Scripture says God has chosen the foolish things of this world to confound the wise. Also, Jesus spoke in parables, and many times was not...

This is not true. There are changed doctrines in Modern Bibles. To give you a flavor of the changed doctrines, see: A List of False Doctrines in Modern Bibles (Which is from another thread). Also, check out Catholic Ideas in the NIV. (Which also appear in other Modern Bibles). There are...

(Continued from my other post to you): 4. John 6:14, 38-40 – The Prophet who came into the world from Heaven to save Verses: "This is of a truth that prophet that should come into the world." (John 6:14) "For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me."...

To you, they are not connected. From my perspective, my words which allude to different Scripture verses are all too clear. Anyway, critics of the King James Bible often focus on trivial details, like: "straining at gnats," while ignoring serious doctrinal errors in Modern Bibles. For example...

Right, when you do not deal with the truth of Bible verses I have shown to you (which are plain in what they say), and you ignore dictionaries, then there really is no point in discussing the Word of God further. The itching ears syndrome has set in. You have chosen to make the Word of God...

Again, just ask people in Greece who are native to living there. It is only the Modern scholars who invented this idea in German Rationalism and did not become popular here in the US until 1940s. So if you lived before the 1940s and you were not modernistic German rationalist, you would not...