Search results

That is why I presented six verses that attest to David being King again and then asked for a timeline.

On occasion I read the New Testament. Have you read where Paul said the eyes of the Jews are blinded until the fulness of the Gentiles comes in? Have you read where Paul said, be not high minded? Paul said the Jew was not cut off so that you might be saved, but rather the Jew was cut-off...

Yes, Jesus proclaimed the acceptable year of the Lord, but the Jew rejected it. They rejected the Lord. The everlasting covenant has not started for the Jew. The promise was to the Jew. God turned to the Gentile, but the Jew sits as an orphan, waiting for their eyes to be opened, and the...

In my Bible the Strong's Hebrew number STRONGS H1732: occurs 1,076 times, and it is translated David 1,076 times

Our definition of New Covenant is not the same. I take mine from Jeremiah 31:31 and Hebrews, where it actually says and describes the new covenant. Only with the understanding that this is a Jewish book written to the Jews, with the exception of some of the writings of Paul, can you begin to...

The age of the Law is over. It was completed with the rejection of the Messiah. There is no physical Temple, there is no King, there is no sacrifice, there is no priest. We are now in the age of the Gentile, where there is no Jew or Gentile. When the age of the Gentile is over, there will be the...

Has the blindness ended?

The word is clearly David and not Jesus. What is your reasoning for not accepting what it says. David's kingdom was an earthly kingdom. Jesus Kingdom is not of this world.

The only place the new covenant is mentioned is in Jeremiah 31 and Hebrews 8 & 9. Heb 8:8-11 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I...

We agree that the entire Bible is about Jesus Christ. In Jeremiah 31:31 and Hebrews 8:8 We see a new covenant with Israel that has not yet taken place. We know that it hasn't taken place because their eyes have not been opened, and because the time of the goys has not been completed. Rom 11:25...

A person can make the bible say anything if you call everything symbolic, whether it lines up with scripture or not. Who are the rest of the dead that are resurrected in Rev 20:5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

I wouldn't consider it symbolic when Ezekiel 37 tells us that Israel is going to be resurrected and God and Magog are going to fight a battle against them in the latter day, when the two kingdoms become one again. Read Ezekiel 37, 38, and 39. Do we have to make everything symbolic when it...

We shall forever have to agree to disagree.

What about the dead that are resurrected, and then the battle that ensues, and involves Gog and Magog?

Do you take the creation story literally?

The age that comes immediately after the millennium.

What about the age to come that is not eternal for all.

I would agree with you that David is dead in this age, but what about the age to come?

Don't you mean literal interpretation?

I want to apologize for my harshness in replying about eschatology. I am sorry I said that.