Search results

So my knowledge on dispensationalist arguments is somewhat lacking here, is there a reason we don't bring up Abraham sleeping through the cutting of the covenant under the law?

Boy, you sure can miss a lot in ten years...

Yeah, the discussion here moves too fast for me to know where to add anything.

I agree. It's almost as if science is synonymous with dairy tales. "This is what scientists think happened."

it is certainly a blessing to need only scripture for your salvation, but that God would allow any of our observations to see His glory in science is an added benefit.

I watched a video on distant starlight. It was quite informative about how creation in biblical terms allowed the billions love years distance between Earth the stars. Additionally, the flood best explains the formation of fossils.

While the words like "historical authenticity" and "fallibility of radiometric dating" and the fact that we are being fought by proponents of syncretism should have clued you in, he is a six say creationist, as am I. I am unsure why you seek a fight with me.

I'm sorry I reacted poorly and read poorly your statement. Allow me too wire a more appropriate response.

I said the HISTORICAL AUTHENTICITY of Genesis was AAAAAAAAAA(in the English language, this article implies the existence of others in it's periphery) primary focus. I refuse to debate with you.

It is geared towards evangelism. With a special emphasis on being prepared for the resistance that "science" wants to offer. Specifically, it collaborates with Christian science specialists (not to be confused with Christian Science) to challenge evolution with observable evidence that presents...

Can't say we have engaged. I'm relatively new to the forums, spent a lot of my time in chat.

Hesitantly allowing this. What would you like to know? I have a vague understanding of some of the scientific stuff, nothing I could stand toe to toe with Nye on, but it's still substantial. Or would you like source material?

At least you aren't saying "supposably"....

My father-in-law has a ministry with a major focus on the historical authenticity of Genesis. Some of the most amazing information has come from his devotion to this ministry. A lot of good scientists working on this too.

I appreciate your defense, and I am not trying to be rude with our brother, but the truth is, once I say "you're not listening/hearing me," so many times, in so many different ways, there is no longer anything positive I can add to the conversation.

It's okay. It has been going pretty smoothly.

I suppose I must concede, here. I am somewhat thwarted, due to the definition.

That was a short lunch break....😐

Did we pick a subject? Maybe I'm a little behind.

If we go to high school, attend a science course, they will teach you evolution. If you try to question it, you will be laughed out. Can you safely be taught without question, the tenants of evolution, without being forced to agree with them?