Search results

The Lord responded by pointing out not just the temple but other magnificent structures surrounding it whose stones would all not sit one atop another. Mark 13:2 And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be...

Yes, a spiritual temple; not a stone building.

I take the Lord literally to mean not one stone atop another. Aerial sorties flying over morning after morning, by day and by night over a period of months is probably what is indicated by Isaiah 28:18-20 that will accomplish this task.

My point is it's a future event, still to come. This is further supported by the other scriptures I've posted (Isaiah 28:18-20; & Amos 6:8-11 &14), which call for a great sacrifice in the land of Israel.

It still has great stones, part of a great structure that was not cast down.

I agree, I see no mention of a future temple.

Here are other scriptures I believe fit in with the upcoming overflowing scourge in Isaiah 28:18-20 that shall destroy much of the Middle East, including the land of Israel. Amos 6:8 The Lord God hath sworn by himself, saith the Lord the God of hosts, I abhor the excellency of Jacob, and hate...

It's a foundation wall, but even if it were only a wall, do you think the Lord would not have thought of that before coming up with the statement of not one stone standing atop another? Did the Romans say: This isn't a building wall, let's leave it alone and go work on the building walls?

While it is well known that the Romans burned all of Jerusalem in 70 AD, they still did not go the trouble of casting down every huge boulder from atop the other, as this would have taken weeks, and numerous slave crews which they would have had to feed to do the labor. This will be accomplished...

Even if it weren't a foundation wall to the temple (to which many Jews pray at its base believing it to be so), its large blocks would still have been the base to one of the very large edifices to which the Lord states: that not one stone of any of the great buildings would lie atop the other...

No, the Lord did not get it wrong. The destruction of Jerusalem where not one stone of the current Wailing wall will be left atop the other is forthcoming, with the overflowing scourge that will pass through, morning by morning passing over, by day and by evening, taking a daily sacrifice of...

Yes, the temple was destroyed in 70 AD, but not every stone was cast down from atop the other (Mark 13:2; Matthew 24:2; & Luke 21:6). The current Wailing wall, the foundation to the temple still stands. Mark 13:2 And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall...

Revelation 9:17-19 attributes the means of genocide to what appear to be tanks. But this is only after environmental pollution has created famine conditions in which the worlds leaders decide to enact a global genocide to resolve the issue. Revelation 9:17 And thus I saw the horses in the...

The levels of pollution in Revelation chapters 8 and 9 which are created by the love mankind has for the works from his hands ( through industry), is a relatively modern phenomena. These could not have occurred in the past, prior to the industrial revolution. All life on earth will be...

Birth pangs it is; totally agree. I never said they had been fulfilled. I think you have me mixed up with KJV1616 to whom I was contesting his perspectives on these events having been fulfilled in 70 AD.

In Revelation 8 we see the destruction to one third of earths environs. In Revelation 9 with the opening of the bottomless pit we see various other environmental issues created that in turn has the four released dark side angels influencing the worlds leaders that the solution to the shortage in...

You do whatever you wish. The angel in Daniel 12:4 and 12:9 tells Daniel to go on his way as the events described to him pertain to the end times, at which time knowledge of these events would then increase. As knowledge of the events described to Daniel in chapters 7 through 12 are only now...

If the people in the first century did not witness all the events in Matt 24, that generation was then not the generation in reference who would see all the events therein occur.

You do not see a flaw in the Lord speaking to they who do not believe in Him to take heed about something? I reiterate: it is completely implausible that some material object will be placed in some newly erected stone building that will have billions of people adoring it.

For the Israeli's not to be worrying about the overflowing scourge because they have an agreement with it, means the overflowing scourge would have been overflowing through some of the other nations in the Southern kingdom/Middle East. This was not the case in 70 AD. The Middle East was already...