Search results

The main point is: book of Acts is not meant for teaching about the nature of the gift of tongues. That God uses not only apostles to show miracles in the first times of the church is not New. He shows today, too, mainly in the Mission context.

Well you change the word of God. Vers 17 says: these signs should follow..... You says: people today are able to....... This is a big difference! Vers 18 says: and if they drink any deadly thing...... You says: accidentally drink poison......... This is also a different! So, how many devils...

No, of course I believe this. But your Suggestions which following vers 16 are to proof that these statements are for today, too.

And it says what: that not all Christians got this gift.

Then proof them!

Thats already happend of course in the apostolic time. But are you shure this is for today? F.e. drinking poison and take up Serpents? I am shure that our father is doing miracles today too. But obviously not in general.

I do not deny this facts!I only cant find your way of interpreting this verses. Also it seems that you dont read my post. I said that 1.cor.12,30 says clear that not all Christians will receive the gift of speaking in tongues.

Do you have the same believesystem as wanswic?

Well then I would say you misinterprete this scriptures. According you claim. I am not an Christian. And all who I know are not Christians. The missionaries, the churches i attend the time since I became a believer are not christians. All non pentecostals and non charismatics are non...

Thanks Sophie, I could understand your post. My grama is a mass, but I can understand your writings. I know it is a difficult and tense matter. Be glad that one day this is over and no theme in heaven.

This is no proof! This were events which made clear to the jews that thecHoly Spirit makes no difference! Btw Acts was not written when Paul wrote his letter to the Cotinthians. And 1. COR 12,3P says clear that not all Christians will receive the gift of speaking in tongues.

Yes, but this is not the point. Some believe or suggestvthat speaking in tongues is for all who search it. And this is not biblical teaching.

So, then why and what I believe ? Nor I believe that menonite theologie is 100% correct, nor I believe the russiangerman Theologie is right in 100%. Its depend in their bases to the word of God.

You did not answer to my reply to you. Or do you Set equal speaking in toungues and have the Holy Spirit? By the way, every believer has a spiritual connection to God the father.

Well, i come from lutheran/Protestantism Background. And learned that I am a Christian, because i was baptised as Baby. I rejected Jesus when I was 17 and met a christian who told me that I must believe in Jesus. I told her then that i have my own believe in God. When I was 25, Jesus opend my...

So you will say me that speaking in tongues is for every Christian? This is an unbiblical teaching. And to say that if one is speaking in tongues has a better or deeper connection to the father is also not true.

Well, every believe system is as good as the truth which stands behind. F.e. if I believe that my sins are forgiven because Jesus Christ paid my sons at the cross. But he did not and has also not Rose again from the death. I can believe it so strong as possible, but I am still and will remain...

So you suggest that speaking to Christ today is only possible through tongues? In the mind that you dont know what you talk or pray in tongues?

Sorry, maby I should use the name , name christianity (Namenschristen) The most Christians in germany are Christians, because of childbaptism (evangelisch/katholisch.)They have no relationship to Christ. So, maby only 2-3% of german population are born again Christians.

Well, then you dont know :-), Amish are not the same like Mennonite or Mennonite bretheren. Maby you should Google. There faithsystem is arminian. No military Service, no swearing. Commimg from founder Menno Siemons. When i became a child of God, i searched for an church and came in an menonite...