Search results

Its so well established that no one has believed it until recently. You like to yap on dispensationalism being new and the Darby and all that yet what you believe is even newer. Jokes on you girl.

Thats a "cant refute what was said" admission. The preterist tank is empty.

I agree its not the Church.

The much hated futurism was the view of the entire early church in the 100s and 200s, how come its only recently people discovered this massively important fact that AD70 marked the end of the heaven and earth? The times of the gentiles DID NOT end in AD70, have you read any history after that...

There you go you did it again. You read the verse in Galatians and conclude "Yeah we are the seed now cause we are in Christ" and IGNORE the promises given to Israel who WILL BE saved at the second coming or prior to it. During the time of Jacob's trouble. Those are the clear promises given...

You cant have a rapture without a resurrection..... " And the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord" Thats not a matter of opinion thats what...

Alright, but thats not pre-trib rapture? Thats already deep in the tribulation.

Glad you asked. Let me explain it to you:* The picture you posted has nothing wrong with it, there is indeed one new man in Christ that includes both gentiles and jews. Where the replacement occurs is that God scattered and cursed Israel after the flesh, and some say that the regathering...

Uh... yes? That is what you should see in reality. Jesus said Jerusalem is trampled by the gentiles UNTIL.......... and they have been trampled by gentiles for 2000 years.

1 Thessalonians 4:15-16 says first the dead are raised, then the rapture, was my point.

But the rapture is after a resurrection, dead in Christ shall rise first. So if you believe in the pre-trib rapture you also believe in a pre-tribulation resurrection of those dead in Christ.

Interesting take, but doesnt revelation 20 teach a resurrection of the tribulation saints after the second coming?

When do you believe this separation of wheat and tares takes place? I think a case can be made for it being the second coming cause it uses the phrase end of the age which Matthew 24 connects to the second coming. I think a case can also be made that it fits nicely with the end of the...

This whole post is amillennial doctrine which crumbles under even surface level scrutiny. I agree with all you said in point number 7, cant wait for those things to occur. Now how about you explain to me how currently in 2026: - Satan is bound, he seems to be deceiving the entire world? -...

WHAT? No He did not and no one says He did except modern day preterist. 2nd century Church writers all believed it was future, strange how EVERYONE missed this false coming you guys peddle. Jesus returned and NOTHING happened outside of a city being destroyed by Romans? What a LAME coming!

Even the demons get triggered by the pre-tribulation rapture! Look around you guys, its all coming together in this world. Israel, the technology for the mark of the beast, the surveillance, the apostasy, the moral decay, the globalism, the LGBT-agenda. We could be outta here ANY DAY now so...

Yeah that argument that its talking about angels is a really bad one cause as you said: They are given fine linen which is the righteousness of the saints. Plus earlier in the book we have mention of CROWNS, which are given to us when? Yeah. Its given to those who love His appearing...

Justin Martyr and Irenaeus both believed in a rebuilt temple, personal antichrist and a millennium, so what garbage sources were you using? They all believed it, so yeah, Read a book called dispensationalism before Darby and also truly who cares what they believed? We go with the Bible. I can...

If the 1st resurrection was in the 1st century the question is who was the beast, what was the mark?

Has Jesus and the saints after Him already been resurrected? I know you believe Jesus has already resurrected, so how does another resurrection after His and after the saints who rose after Him count as numerically first?