Search results

There is only one way to interpret the Little Horn of Daniel 7, and the Little Horn of Daniel 8, in such a manner that does not contradict the rest of the Bible. Little Horn of Daniel 8: This would be the sixth head of the Beast, i.e., Rome. Little Horn of Daniel 7: This would be the eighth...

I've noticed there are some who interpret it that way. I think Daniel would have understood the symbolism of the lion as being Babylon. The symbols parallel perfectly with what happened in other chapters. Think of Nebuchadnezzar being turned into a beast with feathers and then back to human...

Why is the woman pregnant and making babies before she gets married?

Hey AI, what is the Greek word for 'seed' in Revelation 12:17? Wow, like Abraham's Seed. I see, thanks again! :cool:

The Great Dragon: He is cast down to become the first head of the Beast, i.e., the King of Egypt. Always let Scripture interpret Scripture... The phrase 'The Great Dragon' can be seen in both verses. Easy peasy. How did the Israelites overcome the Dragon? By what blood? Hey AI, did...

I have a little bit of free time tonight to talk about the Woman of the Apocalypse: Let us break this verse down. And to the woman...: The woman is whoever has dominion over the lineage or seed of the Messiah. The first woman to carry this seed was Eve. In the context of Revelation 12, the...

You keep making the same mistake over and over. This is something the rookies do. You isolated a verse and then falsely interpreted it instead of looking at the context. By doing that, you contradicted several passages in Revelation. Go back a few verses: The three kings that fell are the...

Lol, your responses are endlessly ironic. Too bad your questions were not sincere. I would have taken the time to answer them. Oh well.

Yes, I was being sarcastic. Obviously the Second Death contradicts the standard false interpretation that "everyone has to die and it's only one time". Like I said earlier, folks are split: I believe it is clearly stated: Common sense teaches us that 'many' is not 'all'. Moreover, we know...

There are several entities being referenced in the verse you quoted. Which one are you referring to? One thing is certain. None of them are Antiochus IV Epiphanes.

I already debunked the opinion that three of the Ten Kings fell. The Bible does not contradict itself. You need to correct your research. Sorry. Interestingly, I was reading the Hitler thread that @ResidentAlien made, and look what I found: That is another Witness to your research being...

That would be the Word Made Flesh. We call that Gene Expression now. The Serpent on a Pole is what we now call RNA. The Stone with Seven Eyes is what we now call a Nucleobase. The Two Witnesses are symbolic of two Chromatids joined to form a Chromosome. Do you know what Kenosis is?

That's quite an early date!

So, you believe Daniel's 'seventy sevens' is just some meaningless phrase because the words 'day' or 'night' are not there?

If that is the case, then the Bible is contradicting itself. All of the verses reference a time like no other: They all reference the same event. I don't believe in, nor do I teach contradictions. Like I said, all of the verses I referenced begin in 70 AD and end at the Second Coming of...

You mean every time someone said, "We only die once! - Hebrews 9:27!!!", they were lying? I guess that means the Rapture is still on. (y) So, what are 'all indications'? Folks seem to be split on that.

Would that be the seventh head?

Are you suggesting that Papal Rome is the seventh head?

I see. The seventh head has not arrived according to Fruchtenbaum's timeline. Fruchtenbaum got the bolded wrong. The Little Horn of Daniel 7 does *not* assassinate three of the Ten Kings. This is a very common misconception and misinterpretation that can easily be debunked. Let us first do a...

Agreed.