Search results

There's no gap, it's not about the crucifixion. It's about the Beast killing Christians for worshipping Jesus. Read Daniel 11 and Revelation 13. There''s far more than 69 weeks between Ezra and Nehemiah building the temple and Jesus being conceived in the womb of the virgin Mary. There's...

Here since you are a butchering the Bible and now just blaspheming God to justify your damnation worthy heresy I'm just going to copy paste the verses. Daniel 9:25-27 25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the...

Verse 27 is about the Antichrist, so your heresy has you claiming that Jesus is the Antichrist, which is blasphemy. You need to discard the heresy.

Well it's not aside, it's a recurring problem because of your heresy. See this is the cognitive patterns your heresy has formed in you, you must discard the heresy first. No It's not about what I think, it's about what the Bible says. Keep reading after verse 20, especially verses 25-27...

Then you read it wrong. A recurring problem with you due to your heresy.

It's heresy cause you're denying the resurrection of Christ, the ascension of Christ, the session of Christ, and the second coming of Christ. It's also denying the veracity of the Bible, trying to twist the scriptures against God, and flirting with cessationism and blasphemy too. For an...

So if Jesus rose again after three days and ascended up to Heaven thus is still alive and sitting at the right hand of the Father putting all his enemies under his feet; how is he cut off? Read the full verse and the verses after. Discard your heresy first.

No, absolutely not, because Jesus rose again 3 days later, ascended into Heaven, and Jesus is still alive sitting at the right hand of the Father.

Well what is it in the first place? There is no private interpretation. You should clarify what you're asking. The Messiah isn't cut off. We've already been over how Jesus is still alive and sitting at the right hand of the Father. Your heresy is denying the session of Christ a key point of...

There's nothing to escape from. What's futurist theology? It's not anyone's fault but your own that you don't believe the Bible and the words of God. It's your own fault that you reject the truth and love the lies, that's why you have to discard the lies first. Your views of modern Israel...

There's no multiple interpretations. Ezra and Nehemiah.

You have a problem not being able to read someone's full comment just like you have a problem not being able to read the full Bible. Your question is already answered in the previous post. It happens in the future near the end of time.

There is no gap. I do believe the 70 weeks given by Gabriel are literal. It's also not figurative either. Also the Bible clearly states that no prophecy is of private interpretation. You're wrong to try to allegorize away the scriptures, that's why you don't understand them even though...

Jesus was talking about his body which is literally a temple which is literally what the text says. Jesus was crucified and then rose again three days later. I believe in Daniel's 70 weeks. That also is about the end of times by the way.

Yea the pagans and the heretics are natural allies seeing as they serve the same master. That's why you need to discard the heresy and get into the Kingdom of God. You can try to undo the the truth of the Bible and the Gospel, but it'll never happen, only your side will lose and the truth of...

When you say the Bible isn't literal what you mean to say is you don't believe the Bible. That's a result of your heresy.

IRGC are pagans so already they're bad guys by default along with anyone that sides with them, they went and committed the biggest massacre in this century so far to start this war. You're the one deceived and deceiving and your side is destined to lose, praise Jesus.

It matters because it means the second temple doesn't fit the prophecy. The second coming is what ushers in the millennial reign. Also it has been longer than a millennium since Jesus ascended into Heaven and sat down at the right hand of the Father to just state the very obvious flaw in...

The second temple does not fit the parameters of Ezekiel's vision by many factors not just the measurements being way way off. Jesus never took a break indeed from being king and is still the king even now since he sits at the right hand of the Father (the Session of Christ), but the millennial...

So how do you not then understand the temple in the chapters of Ezekiel and Revelation for which you wanted me to change the subject to? Or would you now understanding that it is all about the second coming of Christ and the end of the world, like to drop the heretical view and come on over to...