Search results for query: hosper

...Paul addresses the "WHEN" of the ARRIVAL of "the Day of the Lord" (i.e the 7-yr / TRIB portion) when he says it will arrive "EXACTLY LIKE [hosper] the INITIAL "birth PANG" (Jesus spoke of those!) that comes upon a woman (ITh5:1-3)... NOT well-after those have commenced! (The FIRST "birth...

...and ALL he is slated to DO over the course of SOME TIME])... ... which time-period Paul also says in this context will arrive "exactly like [hosper]" the initial "birth pang [singular]" that comes upon a woman in labor--"suddenly" as the text also states (not after the "birth pangs [plural]"...

...at some point WITHIN those "7 years / 2520 days"); Scripture informs us that "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES (to commence) "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that COMES UPON a woman in labor [Jesus spoke of this very point in time, in Matt24:4/Mk13:5 where He refers to...

...time of His Second Coming to the earth (Rev19 / Matt24:29-31 / Isa27:9,12-13, etc), as many suppose. NO! No, it ARRIVES... "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that COMES UPON a woman (the FIRST "BIRTH PANG" JESUS SPOKE OF: Matt24:4 / Mk13:5 "A CERTAIN ONE [(bringing...

..."G5604 [in the SINGULAR]" when referencing when and how "the Day of the Lord" will ARRIVE / COMMENCE, which he says will be "exactly like [hosper] the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR, G5604]" that COMES UPON a woman with child/in labor (i.e. SUDDENLY this initial pang comes upon her! And then...

Paul, in his first letter to the Thessalonians, said that "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that comes upon a woman (the very SAME word that Jesus used in the plural when referencing the "PANGS" ['beginning of'])... which is what Jesus had...

...was "near" / soon to take place)?; c) and that Paul had already in his first letter acknowledged WHEN and HOW it will ARRIVE ("exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [singular]" OF the very ones of those that Jesus had already talked about in Matt24:4-8 / Mk13:5-8 / Lk21:8-11)?; d)...

...[note: again, I believe the man of sin will have already been "revealed" at Seal #1, i.e. when "the day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [singular]," per Paul's 1Th5:1-3 [and elsewhere], i.e. Seal #1). [note: I believe that Rev1:1's "to SHOW unto...

...acknowledged is when "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES, like he says in 1Th5:1-3... where he says that that time-period ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that comes upon a woman... i.e. what Jesus had already spoken of in Matt24:4 / Mk13:5 as the INITIAL ONE of...

...epistle to them, in 1Th5:1-3 [re: the INTIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]"--which he says "the day of the Lord" will ARRIVE "exactly like [G5618 - hosper]"--that's Seal #1--OF the very "beginning of birth PANGS [PLURAL]" that Jesus had spoken of... Matt24:4/Mk13:5 "A CERTAIN ONE [G5100 - tis - 'a...

...BY" [BY the fact of "our Rapture" (v.1)]; --in 1Th5:1-3, Paul already made abundantly clear that "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly as [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" (OF "the beginning of birth PANGS [PLURAL]" that Jesus had spoken of in His Olivet Discourse); and the...

...Trib yrs; --1Th5:1-3 already made abundantly clear that "the day of the Lord" (an earthly-located TIME-PERIOD) will "ARRIVE" "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [singular]" that comes upon a woman in labor... and this is exactly what Jesus had spoken of in Matt24:4 / Mk13:5...

...(with its "judgments" and its "man of sin"); and Paul had already made abundantly clear that "the Day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [singular]" (i.e. Matt24:4 / Mk13:5 [aka SEAL #1]), NOT LATER at His Second Coming point in time (Matt24:29-31)...

...that] the day of the Lord IS PRESENT / IS ALREADY HERE." [Recall, Paul in his earlier letter states "the DOTL" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper ] the INITIAL "birth PANG"... Jesus spoke of those in the PLURAL, and they ARE EQUIVALENT the SEALS of Rev6 at the START OF the "IN QUICKNESS [noun...

...(if by that you mean: Rev19 / Matt24:29-31 / 2Th2:8b, etc); Paul very clearly says that the ARRIVAL of the day of the Lord is "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" and he is talking about what Jesus had referred to when in His Olivet Discourse He spoke of "the beginning...

...say that. It's referring back to verse 2 ("the DAY of the Lord"), which Paul in his first letter had already stated arrives "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth pang" that comes upon a woman (that's well-prior to His Second Coming to the earth). You are doing the same thing that...

...equivalent to the first of "the beginning of birth pangs" and which Paul had said that the arrival of "the day of the Lord" is "exactly like [hosper]" that initial birth pang (not toward their conclusion! Many more birth pangs--plur.--will follow on from that INITIAL birth pang, which is Seal...

...the 7-yr period leading up to THAT). [not to mention that Paul, in 1Th5:1-3, states that "the day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [singular]" that comes upon a woman... referring to that which Jesus had spoken of, namely in Matt24:4/Mk13:5 as the...

...that desire the day of the LORD! to what end is it for you? [...]" In 1Th5:1-3, Paul GOES ON to say, that its arrival is... "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG" that comes upon a woman. That's what Jesus was talking about in His Olivet Discourse, where He'd referred to "the...

...perspective, but I do disagree. What are your thoughts about how Paul (in 1Th5:1-3) stated that the DOTL's ARRIVAL will be "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [singular]" that comes upon a woman, as referring back to that which Jesus had spoken of in His Olivet Discourse, namely...